gotta rant about vegetables for a minute and also more generally about morality-based dietary planning
legit furious rn
so tldr my grandpa is 100 and my mom handles his meal prep
he has great difficulty eating, gets ~500kcal down daily
and my mom is losing her mind
she's losing her mind because the assisted living staff are some combination of (1) not paid enough to actually feed gpa the carefully-labeled foods that she painstakingly prepares for him and she is in her 70s and TIRED and "trying to keep my dad from starving" is her life now
meanwhile grandpa while he yes he is 100 years old is far, far weaker than he needs to be because he is not eating enough and is slow motion starving because of it, apparently he's less than 100 pounds now
so mom dropped kiddo off today after watching her and went on a rant about this situation, as she should, it's maddening
complaining about all the produce she throws out, assistants messing up her carefully labeled system, etc etc
and at one point she mentions that she said fuck it and made him bananas foster after her brother was worried about grandpa not eating bananas anymore
and that surprisingly he was able to down the whole thing in like 15 minutes (usually meals take hours)
that's where i flipped
do you have any idea how many calories are in something like this
i bet it's more than 500
why the fuck are they not just giving him a giant bowl of ice cream at every fucking meal
why are they buying PRODUCE
why are they labeling shit. huge containers of ice cream? EASILY PREPARED. EASILY ORGANIZED
why the fuck has no one had the thought "gosh let's let this dude who is literally starving just eat ice cream, a food he easily eats when he can eat almost nothing else and only with great difficulty, all day"
"it's not nutritious" motherfucker 500 kcal a day!!!! how much nutrition do you think is in that?
he is ONE HUNDRED YEARS OLD
he doesn't need vegetables for whatever bullshit reason you think those are important
he needs CALORIES
and proteins, which incidentally, dairy?
the only reason i can imagine is that everyone involved in this is hopelessly FDA-brained or unthinkingly working with a model of eating based entirely on some premodern morality of suffering
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
and im mildly sorry to whoever got my messages about getting cancer and wishing that hamas had targeted them instead and also how im gonna show up at their funeral and ruin it for their grieving survivors
my immediate response did get me thinking about what in particular was so affecting about the experience, and ive decided to meditate on that and on what precisely is the cause of my outrage
let us begin with a consideration of the Iliad in the original greek
starting a new thread today because the other one got long and because things are heating up
1. Israel is totally going to blow up al-Shifa Hospital.
IDF has been broadcasting the message that the hospital is Hamas' headquarters at length; reportedly Hamas is holding a press conference there, but I haven't confirmed that.
They're also giving a press conference to international reporters making the same claims.
This isn't a wild idea; it has in fact been widely reported since 2014.
I'm inclined to believe this claim because (1) it is absolutely exactly the sort of thing Hamas does; (2) the reporting on this has been persistent and broad; (3) I am extremely doubtful Israel would deliberately blow up a hospital unless they had a strong operational reason for doing so, especially given the blowback they got the last time they were accused of striking a hospital.
How will this go for them? I don't know. My guess is that this deliberate preparation of foreign media will work to their advantage, as will the fact that they were already falsely accused earlier; it's plausible that people generally are in some sense desensitized. Hard to say though.
2. Diplomacy updates. This has also been an active front.
Qatar has sentenced 8 Indian nationals to death on charges of spying for Israel. I somewhat doubt they are going to be executed; this is being done for messaging purposes. I have no insight as to what the message is intended to be, nor to whom it is for. It might be an attempt to pressure some party to bargain harder on some other matter.
Or from another angle: making accusations of spying public can function as a commitment device for one party to a conflict short of war to take a more hostile position toward the other. This may be what Qatar is seeking to do here but I don't know why they would use this approach instead of feigning greater anger over strikes on Gaza or similar.
It also has the side effect of pissing India off. attn @Indians4Israel
source:
Times of Israel is reporting that Hamas is feigning talks to delay a ground offensive.
I don't know why Hamas would do this. Hamas chose the time of its attacks and could have easily finished any preparations it chose in advance of launching them. Perhaps they imagine that some pressure--internal? external? financial?--on Israel would mount the further we get from 10/7.
Alternatively, this kind of leak could be laying the groundwork for Israel to break off the talks at some point near in the future, given that Hamas is in fact probably not going to be releasing the hostages en masse anyway.
source:
What's more likely to me is that Israel or a faction in Israel is inclined to kick off a more aggressive ground offensive and is engaged in a tug of war with other diplomats over whether to continue negotiations or whether continuation can even be justified.
Consider the above where "diplomatic sources" are reporting "significant progress." Yeah, I mean, maybe. We don't know their country and we don't know their names, but we can guess that they want negotiations to keep running.
The fact that the country of those "diplomatic sources familiar with the negotiations" is not identified, and the fact that they aren't actually identified as "officials"--contrast with the "US official" cited below--leaves IMO a lot of room for the "diplomatic sources" in fact being Hamas using CNN to generate a favorable headline.
As far as I can tell, the claims of "[quick] develop[ments] and a "major shift" started at al-Jazeera, which of course is a Qatari mouthpiece; and there is obviously a press by some faction to generate this impression among the public.
Overall, if I had to guess I would say that Israel decided they were going to kick things off and Hamas is going overtime to make it seem as though Israel were thereby belligerently overturning negotiations that were on the verge of success--we swear!
It's possible that this is actually what happened but from my vantage point, I rather doubt it.
as a crisis proceeds events tend to become less dramatic or pressing as things settle into something like a routine and any given moment or decision tends to have less importance for the future
ty @spiderfoods for image
1. diplomacy rumors
i don't think this is anything like confirmed but some reports that Turkey asked Hamas leaders to leave the country
Turkey is sui generis but one more scrap of evidence that Hamas' support among regional states is only superficial
1. according to their spokesman, women are officially supporting hamas
the notion of it being "fascist" to be inclined to support against hamas is to me fascinating, and pretending to take it seriously has been a helpful exercise