Want to answer this question because I think my account has made some people interested in custom tailoring, and I'm afraid they're going to waste their money on bad purchases. 🧵
I often get emails from people who are getting married and want the best suit possible for their big day. So their instinct is to spring for a custom suit. They assume that custom is better than ready-to-wear (RTW). This is a mistake.
It may be that you need custom, but custom need not be better than ready-to-wear.
Here are two garments made by the same company. One is bespoke; the other is RTW. Can you spot the difference?
(Ignore the shirt cuff. Adjusting a coat sleeve is a trivial job for alterations)
Answer: the bespoke coat accounts for the wearer's asymmetrically sloped shoulders. RTW does not, so there is some collapsing around the rib cage on the wearer's right side.
But this, too, can be adjusted through alterations. Just have to take a wedge out of the shoulder.
If you adjust the ready-to-wear coat above in this way, the two coats would be identical. The challenge, then, is for you to recognize when a garment fits.
If you go to a skilled tailor, they will take care of these details for you. But this assumes you have a good tailor.
In fact, most custom tailoring is quite bad. The downside of custom tailoring is that you can't put things back on the rack if they don't fit. Any operation that offers a money-back guarantee is a bad tailor that's banking on the probability you won't know the difference.
A lot of custom tailoring on the market is made-to-measure (MTM). And while good MTM exists (and can be better than bad bespoke), there are also a lot of bad MTM operations out there.
What's the difference between bespoke and MTM?
Bespoke means a garment is made from scratch. The pattern is (theoretically) drafted for you from scratch. The garment is then made through a series of typically three fittings.
MTM is made by digitally adjusting a pre-made block pattern. Garment is made straight to finish.
A lot of MTM operations out there, particularly those charging less than $1k for a suit, are using trendy pre-made block patterns. That means short, tight coat and very slim pants. This can be great if you're built like a Saint Laurent model, but most customers are not.
This is how you wind up with so many of the things I mention on this account:
- Collar gap
- Lapel buckles from chest
- Shoulder divots
- Pulling at the buttoning point
- Shirt fabric shows below buttoning point
- Overly high buttoning point
- Pants cling to legs
Etc etc etc
Such problems are exacerbated when you buy custom tailoring online because you no longer have an experienced fitter helping you figure out what needs to be changed. Adjusting a custom garment is not trivial. Changing one part can cause problems in other areas.
There are many reasons to go custom:
- You value craftsmanship for its own sake
- You like a certain tailor's house style
- You have an uncommon build. For example, if you have a size 46 or 48 chest, you probably need custom. If you are over 6'4", you also prob need custom.
The chance of you being one of those builds is small. You are probably a good fit for ready-to-wear adjusted through alterations. The upside of RTW is that you can put things back on the rack if you don't like it. Some RTW options I like:
If you want to go custom, choose a tailor whose house style you like. Ideally, you've seen their work on real people (not models). Better still if those people have a similar build as you. Don't assume that custom automatically means "better."
If you do MTM, ask the shop if they have try-on garments. These are ready-made garments produced on the block pattern. By trying these on first, you can see:
- Do you like the general silhouette on you
- How far are you from the block. Fewer adjustments = better
Online made-to-measure can be fine for simple garments like shirts. They are much more risky for things like suits, sport coats, and even trousers. Try ready-to-wear first. Identify your specific fit challenges and see if they can be solved through alterations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the suit in question. It's a bespoke suit by Anderson & Sheppard in London. The cloth is a 60/40 mohair-wool blend from Standeven's "Carnival" book. The stylist was George Cortina.
To understand why this suit is interesting, you have to know a bit about tailoring history
In the early 20th century, Dutch-English tailor Frederick Scholte noticed that a man could be made to look more athletic if he belted up his guard's coat, puffing out the chest and nipping the waist. So he built this idea into his patterns. Thus the "drape cut" war born.
In 1881, Hans Wilsdorf was born in Bavaria, then part of Germany, to parents who died not long after he was born. At a young age, Wilsdorf set off into the world. He landed in England in 1903, which at the time had virtually no formal immigration controls.
Lucky for him. Two years later, fear of poor Eastern European Jews flooding the UK led to 1905 Aliens Act, which moved the country from an open-door policy to one of stricter control. This was the first British law that labeled certain migrants as "undesirable."
I can tell you who goes to cobblers. And a bit about the trade. 🧵
In the 18th century, men got shoes from two types of people. The upper classes went to cordwainers, who measured feet and made shoes from scratch. The lower working-classes went to cobblers, who cobbled together shoes using scraps from salvaged pre-owned footwear.
A cobbler was also someone who repaired footwear. Hence the Middle English term cobeler ("mender of shoes") deriving from an early form of cobble ("to mend roughly, patch"). In shoemaking, cordwainers and cobblers were considered distinct trades. Cobbler was lower on the ladder.
An offhand comment about how Prince Harry doesn't dress very well seems to have stirred up his fans. So here's a thread on how both Harry and William don't dress well when compared to the older men in their family — and how this represents a broader decline in taste. 🧵
I should say at the outset that I don't care about the drama surrounding the Royal family. I don't care if you're Team Markle or Team Middleton or Team whatever. I am simply talking about clothes. The following is also not meant to be personal jabs; just an honest review.
The first thing to understand is that select members of royal family were incredible dressers. Most notable is Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor. For a time, whatever he wore, others followed. He popularized cuffed trousers, belts, and a tailoring style known as the "drape cut."
When we zoom in on the wallet, we see the label "Saint Laurent Paris," a French luxury fashion house that became popular about ten years ago when Kanye started wearing the label. This was also when Hedi Slimane was at the company's creative helm.
For many young men at the time, Saint Laurent was their entry into designer fashion, partly because the designs were conceptually approachable (LA rocker, Hot Topic), while the Kanye co-sign made them cool and the prices signaled status (and for the uninformed, suggested quality)
When I was on a menswear forum, navy trousers were of great controversy. Discussions about them lasted many years, resulting in long-lasting rivalries. Sometimes people refrained from speaking about them out of fear of dredging up old debates.
First, I should state at the outset that there's no way to have this conversation without, in some way, speaking crudely about certain classes of people. I make no judgements about their worth or dignity. I am only describing the semiotics of men's dress.
Second, everything depends on your goals. Dress is not a science, so there are no overriding laws. Everything is contextual to culture. More on this later
Before we start, here are two outfits involving green sport coats. Which do you like better? Please choose before moving on.