Want to answer this question because I think my account has made some people interested in custom tailoring, and I'm afraid they're going to waste their money on bad purchases. 🧵
I often get emails from people who are getting married and want the best suit possible for their big day. So their instinct is to spring for a custom suit. They assume that custom is better than ready-to-wear (RTW). This is a mistake.
It may be that you need custom, but custom need not be better than ready-to-wear.
Here are two garments made by the same company. One is bespoke; the other is RTW. Can you spot the difference?
(Ignore the shirt cuff. Adjusting a coat sleeve is a trivial job for alterations)
Answer: the bespoke coat accounts for the wearer's asymmetrically sloped shoulders. RTW does not, so there is some collapsing around the rib cage on the wearer's right side.
But this, too, can be adjusted through alterations. Just have to take a wedge out of the shoulder.
If you adjust the ready-to-wear coat above in this way, the two coats would be identical. The challenge, then, is for you to recognize when a garment fits.
If you go to a skilled tailor, they will take care of these details for you. But this assumes you have a good tailor.
In fact, most custom tailoring is quite bad. The downside of custom tailoring is that you can't put things back on the rack if they don't fit. Any operation that offers a money-back guarantee is a bad tailor that's banking on the probability you won't know the difference.
A lot of custom tailoring on the market is made-to-measure (MTM). And while good MTM exists (and can be better than bad bespoke), there are also a lot of bad MTM operations out there.
What's the difference between bespoke and MTM?
Bespoke means a garment is made from scratch. The pattern is (theoretically) drafted for you from scratch. The garment is then made through a series of typically three fittings.
MTM is made by digitally adjusting a pre-made block pattern. Garment is made straight to finish.
A lot of MTM operations out there, particularly those charging less than $1k for a suit, are using trendy pre-made block patterns. That means short, tight coat and very slim pants. This can be great if you're built like a Saint Laurent model, but most customers are not.
This is how you wind up with so many of the things I mention on this account:
- Collar gap
- Lapel buckles from chest
- Shoulder divots
- Pulling at the buttoning point
- Shirt fabric shows below buttoning point
- Overly high buttoning point
- Pants cling to legs
Etc etc etc
Such problems are exacerbated when you buy custom tailoring online because you no longer have an experienced fitter helping you figure out what needs to be changed. Adjusting a custom garment is not trivial. Changing one part can cause problems in other areas.
There are many reasons to go custom:
- You value craftsmanship for its own sake
- You like a certain tailor's house style
- You have an uncommon build. For example, if you have a size 46 or 48 chest, you probably need custom. If you are over 6'4", you also prob need custom.
The chance of you being one of those builds is small. You are probably a good fit for ready-to-wear adjusted through alterations. The upside of RTW is that you can put things back on the rack if you don't like it. Some RTW options I like:
If you want to go custom, choose a tailor whose house style you like. Ideally, you've seen their work on real people (not models). Better still if those people have a similar build as you. Don't assume that custom automatically means "better."
If you do MTM, ask the shop if they have try-on garments. These are ready-made garments produced on the block pattern. By trying these on first, you can see:
- Do you like the general silhouette on you
- How far are you from the block. Fewer adjustments = better
Online made-to-measure can be fine for simple garments like shirts. They are much more risky for things like suits, sport coats, and even trousers. Try ready-to-wear first. Identify your specific fit challenges and see if they can be solved through alterations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.