100 years ago today (November 8-9, 1923), the Nazi Party, led in person by Adolf Hitler, unsuccessfully attempted to seize power in Munich in what became known as the Beer Hall Putsch. #100yearsago
Hitler believed that hyperinflation (which had destroyed many people's savings) and the renewed French occupation of the industrial Ruhr had laid the foundation for a coup similar to Mussolini's seizure of power in Italy the previous year.
Just as Mussolini led his Fascists in a "March on Rome", Hitler intended to launch a rising in Munich and then march to Berlin, where the democratic Weimar government would be deposed.
The coup attempt kicked off at a large beer hall called the Bürgerbräukeller, in central Munich, where local politicians were speaking to a crowd of 3,000 people. Hitler expected them to be sympathetic and join the uprising.
Hitler had secured the participation of two well-known war heroes, Erich Ludendorff (one of Germany's top generals in World War I) and Hermann Göring (a top flying ace), which he believed would rally popular support.
Hitler's arrival at the beer hall did not go as planned. The local politicians and generals were reluctant to join his revolt, but played along after he fired his pistol into the ceiling. Thinking he had persuaded them, Hitler let down his guard - and let them escape.
By morning, it was clear that things were going off the rails. Still, with his Nazi followers gathering throughout the city, Hitler decided to lead a march through the center of Munich to face down local authorities and force them to choose sides.
Hitler and his top comrades linked arms and marched down the street to the Odeonsplatz - a scene they would later reenact many times after Hitler came to power a decade later.
To their shock, after warning them to halt, the soldiers send to stop them opened fire. Hitler was injured when the marcher next to him was shot dead. 19 Nazis, four police officers, and one bystander were killed in the ensuing firefight.
The injured Hitler fled and hid in a friend's home in the countryside. Depressed and believing his movement was destroyed, he had to be prevented from killing himself when the police came to arrest him.
The leading members of the Putsch were arrested and put on trial. But Hitler rallied himself, and put on a vibrant courtroom defense that won him widespread attention and admiration across Germany, including from the judges.
Instead of being deported (back to Austria), Hitler (along with his comrades) was given a lenient sentence. Ludendorff was acquitted outright. Many Germans seemed to sympathize with his motives, if not the plot itself.
Hitler used his short - and comfortable (admirers kept sending him gifts of food) - time in prison to write "Mein Kampf", a fiery dissertation on his philosophy and goals. It became a huge bestseller, and a big money-maker for Hitler personally.
Interestingly, though, the Putsch and its outcome convinced Hitler that to succeed, the Nazis would have to pursue a "legal" path to power through elections, rather than an armed uprising. Which didn't, of course, rule out roughing up opponents.
In the short-run, Hitler and the Nazis receded in popularity as the German economy recovered in the 1920s. But the Beer Hall Putsch established Hitler's fame and reputation, which would rise to the fore again when the Great Depression hit in 1929.
BTW, Hermann Göring was badly wounded in the firefight at the Odeonplatz, and never fully recovered. He developed a morphine addiction which plagued him even after the Nazis rose to power and he took command of Germany's Air Force, the Luftwaffe.
If you're interested in the Beer Hall Putsch and its immediate aftermath, I highly recommend reading "1924: The Year That Made Hitler" by Peter Ross Range. amazon.com/1924-Year-That…
The same author wrote an excellent sequel that tracks Hitler's subsequent rise to power by (mostly) legal means: amazon.com/Unfathomable-A…
Sidenote: until Hitler's performance at the trial, most people saw Ludendorff as the main figurehead of the coup attempt. Ludendorff was not thrilled at being upstaged by a former corporal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I no longer feel like I belong in this country. On a deeply personal level, its values are no longer my values, as they once were. My persistence in it feels increasingly strange and unwelcome.
This is not some angry declaration. The feeling perplexes me, more than anything else.
I say this as someone who served in the military, worked in politics, and spoke proudly and fondly of our country while living abroad.
Well, so it has come to pass. I cannot say I am surprised, because I did see it coming, but it is saddening nonetheless. I will not say much, because I don't trust myself to. But I do think this nation has made a grave mistake. How grave, we shall only learn in time.
This is not the country that I spent a lifetime, at home and abroad, loving and defending. It is something else, and what exactly that means for me I cannot yet say.
I'm cautious about sayihg what I really feel right now, especially on this platform, because I know it would be mocked. And that, itself, is a symptom of what I see, the glee that many now take in other Americans' sadness and fear. We are remaking ourselves in his image.
Then you're a fool. We have a democratic republic. I've been a limited-government conservative Republican my whole life. In fact, some of my major criticisms of Trump are that he is too much a big-government interventionist in the economy.
This inanity about "the US is not a democracy, it's a republic" is getting way too prevalent. The US has a republican form of government - as does China and North Korea. Unlike them, it is democratic in that it derives its authority from the consent of the governed.
"The US is not a democracy, it's a republic" is a line that comes from the old John Birch Society (which was drummed out of the mainstream Republican Party because of its extreme conspiratorial views) based on a very ignorant reading of how the Founders used the term democracy.
If Musk tried to withhold Starlink services to aid a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, our Defense Dept should sit him down and tell him he going to restore it or the U.S. government is appropriating the company in the interests of national security. Full stop.
I’m usually for the U.S. government taking a hands-off approach to business, but we’re talking about a wartime scenario that would almost certainly involve the U.S. in a peer-to-peer conflict and there’d be no room for fooling around.
And quite frankly if he was having conversations with any adversary country about it that would be very problematic in and of itself.
1. There are times when a thread makes so many important mistakes and feeds into so many misconceptions that it's worthwhile to address it point by point. My apologies.
2. It is true that Trump's tariffs against China were ostensibly imposed for the purpose of forcing China to alter it own unfair trade practices - in large part because the President's legal authority to levy special tariffs requires him to cite this as the reason.
3. However, it was unclear from the start what the "ask" was from China - what exactly the Trump Admin wanted China to do that would allow the tariffs to be lifted. And Trump repeatedly talked about tariffs being good and beneficial in their own right.
The reason the bills are “mammoth” is that they includes hundreds, even thousands of legislative changes on a wide variety of unrelated topics. Basically a “bill of bills”.
Where AI could help us by offering some context to what these often small changes actually mean, in terms of policy. Often it’s hard to understand what changing “and” to “or” in Clause 81 of Title II refers to or the impact it could have.