David Miliband Profile picture
Nov 10 13 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
As the UN Security Council meets on Gaza, a thread on the profound humanitarian crisis in Gaza; why civilians need a humanitarian ceasefire now; and what help for civilians dictates it must include: ⬇️
There is a moral and humanitarian imperative, which grows more urgent every day, to allow aid to flow and for civilian protection measures to be put in place.

We urge the Council to pass a resolution to spur a meaningful, multi-day humanitarian ceasefire across Gaza.
The IRC has made clear what that entails:

It must cover all of Gaza, be agreed by all parties, be monitored by the UN, and come alongside a streamlined clearance process for humanitarian goods and staff via all available crossing points.rescue.org/press-release/…
This help for civilians requires sufficient duration. After a month of bombardment and blockade, aid delivery and civilian protection requires days not hours of respite.
We have said the minimum duration is five days. But for each day that the conflict deepens humanitarian need, the time required to deliver and sustain life-saving support will grow longer.
The following conditions are essential to ensure the ceasefire means lives are saved and civilians can be protected:
1. Massive scale up of all humanitarian supplies into Gaza. Combined with re-starting and sustaining the delivery of fuel, water and electricity supplies to make possible effective aid delivery.
2. The free and safe movement of aid workers to assess needs and deliver and monitor the aid flows.
3. The evacuation of the sick and the wounded within or out of Gaza. Routes of movement should be identified, communicated, and be safe from attack. Their right to return must be guaranteed in advance.
4. The safe passage of civilians who wish to flee with the right to return. Routes of movement should be identified, communicated, and be safe from attack. Those who remain retain their protections under IHL.
5. The immediate release of hostages to safety.
This is the bare minimum to protect civilians and launch a humanitarian response at scale, in accordance with international humanitarian law. History has shown “safe zones” to be unsafe. They are not the answer and should not become a distraction.
Civilians in Gaza need this action now. This is the security that the Council needs to deliver.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Miliband

David Miliband Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DMiliband

Oct 14
Horrific violence that violates fundamental norms of humanity has claimed the lives of over 1,200 in Israel and 1,400 Palestinians, including 447 children.

The way that war is conducted matters. The IRC is calling on the international community to ensure the following: (1/8)
1️⃣ Protect civilians from further harm: All parties to the conflict must uphold their obligations under international law and the protections provided for civilians under International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law. (2/8)
2️⃣ Ensure that civilian objects are protected: International Humanitarian Law requires armed actors to take all feasible precautions prior to attack, to avoid or minimize incidental harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. (3/8)
Read 8 tweets
Dec 20, 2018
Vladimir Putin’s contempt for, or fear of, a People’s Vote will not shock anybody. The overwhelming evidence of malign and multiple Russian interventions in western democratic processes, including the Brexit referendum, have been designed to destabilize democratic rule.
It is an insult to the United Kingdom that he should be lecturing us our democratic process.
The idea that democratic consent for Brexit policy should end on 23 June 2016 is dangerous. Theresa May’s plan satisfies no one and was not the basis of the Leave campaign.
It would be prudent reinforcement of democratic principles to revisit democratic support before it is implemented. Russian support for a Bad Deal alongside British government threats of No Deal should be taken as strong evidence that a different option is needed.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(