Alright, since you decided to ask me, I'll tell you why the same guy you praise for "wonderful analysis" also concludes, based on the facts & evidence, that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza:
There are multiple definitions of genocide, but the most widely cited is the 2002 Rome Statute's, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). Around 120 countries are signatories (notably the US and Israel still refuse to sign it):
Right off the bat let's debunk some common misconceptions about "genocide": You don't have to exterminate *everyone* for it to be genocide. Genocide is not a crime of body count (although body count matters). Genocide is a crime of *intent*.
The bar for the crime of genocide is met when there's intent to *destroy*, in whole or in part, a people. "Destroy" can manifest in many ways - killing is one, but also inflicting upon them unlivable conditions. "Conditions calculated to bring about the group's destruction".
Since intent is key, let's focus on it. Normally*, whoever commits genocide won't go out and say "hey we'd like to wipe these people out". Normally, they hide their intent, and intent is typically the most difficult part to prove. (Hold on to the word "normally" for a sec please)
Since intent is rarely explicit, the law allows it to be *inferred* from broader context including:
- Scale & systematic nature of the violence
- Chosen methods
- Choices of victims/targets
- Evidence of cover up
- Patterns of narratives/speech used by political/military leaders
Alright, so let's for a sec follow the "inference" route. It is now very well documented that Israel systematically targeted:
- Hospitals
- Water tanks
- Solar panels
- Journalists
- Bakeries
- Fishing boats
- Schools
- Ambulances
- Residential blocks
- Aid & UN workers
(I don't have to go point by point because all of the above is *very* well documented and even captured live). It's also well documented that Israel's chosen bombs/methods are indiscriminate (easily proven by the fact that ~70% of the 12k dead are women, children, or elderly).
It is also well documented that Israel:
- Cut off the flow of food, water, & fuel to a civilian population
- Targeted basic telecom infrastructure (internet, phone service)
- Used easy-to-debunk disinfo & lies to pin the blame for *every* one of its atrocities on the other side
I know the typical US reaction would be "but Hamas!" To them Hamas is hiding in water tanks and solar panels. But if this is about Hamas, someone explain why 150+ Palestinians (incl 40+ children) have been killed in the West Bank, where there's no Hamas?
Anyway: It's also well documented that Israeli ministry of intel produced a multi-stage plan for inflicting mass suffering on the population of Gaza to force them off their land and into the Sinai desert. So far Israel is following this plan actually:
(The above is important because while "ethnic cleansing" is not by itself a crime under the Rome Statute, it is widely acknowledged that there's a continuum between genocide & ethnic cleansing. Genocide is often a way to ethnically cleanse a people or force a population transfer)
It's also uncontroversial that Israel's leaders have repeatedly and systematically used language & references that makes it clear that *everyone* in Gaza, and not only Hamas, is a target. Israel's PM even tweeted it, and not just once:
Okay so now that we get to the speech/rhetoric of Israeli leadership, we can drop the pretense that we have to "infer" genocidal intent. There's *so much* documented.
Remember I told you to hold on to that "normally" a few tweets ago? Yeah, you can stop holding on to it now
There are several folks who have been collecting these statements of intent. One of them is br Abu Bakr Hussain who's updating a list daily and has it available for download as well. Not everything in his list is from politicians/leadership, but a lot is:
You can also look at the replies under this tweet. I believe others including @muhammadshehad2 and @m7mdkurd also have been collecting official & unofficial statements under tweets & in threads of their own:
@muhammadshehad2 @m7mdkurd Craig Mokhiber worked at the UN for 30+ years and until recently was director of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights' NY office. Listen to him explain how normally intent is the hardest to prove, but in this case, intent "is an easy case to make":
@muhammadshehad2 @m7mdkurd But now that we're citing experts, let's mention how so many *actual genocide scholars* have assessed that Israel is committing the crime of genocide. Again there's so much of this that I can't fit it all in a thread but some are under this tweet:
@muhammadshehad2 @m7mdkurd An important voice has been Arnesa Buljušmić-Kustura (@Rrrrnessa), who is both an academic expert on genocide and a survivor of genocide. But there's also Luis Moreno Ocampo, ex-ICC prosecutor. And Raz Segal, an Israeli expert on modern genocide:
@muhammadshehad2 @m7mdkurd @Rrrrnessa (Btw correct me if I'm wrong but even in the case of the Bosnian genocide & the Iraqi Kurdish genocide, explicit public statements of intent were relatively scarce and intent had to be inferred from chain of command orders & military tactics/context. Here it's more explicit.)
@muhammadshehad2 @m7mdkurd @Rrrrnessa So yes: I write some decent threads on geopolitical analysis. Yes: I'm a human being who gets exhausted and triggered. But when I say Israel is committing genocide it's not hyperbole. It's a conclusion based upon the facts & evidence, and the conclusion of many noted experts.
Ultimately whether or not it's genocide will have to be determined through a thorough international independent investigation, followed by a fair, balanced, public trial. But we *know* we won't get that. Israel & the US are not party to the ICC. Israel is above the law.
I can still hear them say "but Hamas!"
- Hamas very likely committed war crimes & crimes against humanity on Oct 7
- Israel's actions since Oct 7 (fully backed by the West) can credibly be described as genocidal
No contradiction there
Finally: I know all of this will not make any difference to many people who have enthusiastically swallowed the Israeli propaganda & disinfo echoed by racist political & media institutions in the West. No amount of evidence will work on them. Why? This:
In case the original post I'm responding to is deleted
Okay, you could read the entire thread. Or you can just skip here and listen to an actual genocide expert lay it out better than I ever can. Worth the 13 mins of your time. Thank you @OwenJones84
Israel is historically unique in that it struts like a hegemon but survives like a colony. It dominates its region militarily and psychologically, yet is so critically dependent on foreign support that if the lifeline is cut, the entire structure starts to collapse.
No state in modern history combines such regional dominance with such strategic dependence. Israel wields power like an empire, but lives like a protectorate - it can't sustain its supremacy without continuous Western military, economic, and diplomatic support.
To be clear, Israel is *not* a colony in key ways:
- It has no metropole
- It is sovereign and self-governing
- It exports ideology and security doctrine
- Its elite wield global influence
- It wasn't built for extraction but for replacement
Israel will never accept a sovereign, strong Syria. No amount of "goodwill signals" will change that, they’ll only be read as weakness and invite more aggression. Israel looks only at your capacity, never your intent. Its doctrine is security through mass devastation.
This government wasted months on appeasement while Israel bombed Syria 1000+ times, occupied ~200 sq km of land, inflamed sectarian tensions, this on top of its longstanding occupation of the Golan. Appeasement didn’t buy time or security. It sent a signal of weakness.
Accept reality or be crushed by it: Syria's main enemy isn't Hezbollah or Iran, it's Israel. Signaling "shared enemies" while it's murdering your people and occupying your land wasn't just naive, it was malpractice and an insult to strategy and to memory. ynetnews.com/article/hk00bz…
Here's a thread about Netanyahu's calculus for regional recalibration in the aftermath of the 12-day war with Iran.
Netanyahu is due to meet Trump tomorrow, and a lot might change - this is a thread about what won't
When Israel launched its war on Iran mid-June, I had said it's Netanyahu's war. Yes, it was also Israel's war, another war of consensus. But Netanyahu doesn't do anything unless it helps him politically.
This is a map of the parameters.
As many of you know, Netanyahu has faced mounting legal troubles for years. He's been indicted on charges of corruption and abuse of power. Long story short, he needs to be in power to stay out of prison.
So, the 12-day war between Israel (& the US) vs Iran seems to be over, and the ceasefire seems to be holding. Here's a thread assessing what has changed, what didn't change, and what may be next:
Since it's Israel who started this war, let's start with its war aims (declared & assumed):
- End Iran's nuclear program
- Regime change
- Kill Iran-US negotiations for a new deal
- Drag the US in
- Distract from Gaza
- Stop Europe’s 2SS push
So, was Iran's nuclear program stopped?
Expert consensus is forming around "no". The facilities were damaged but not fully destroyed. The US telegraphed its attacks early enough that Iran moved not just the uranium, but likely the centrifuges too.
A quick situational update after the US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities. Events might to accelerate, so I'm hoping to give you a snapshot of how things stand as of the time of writing this thread.
The US warned Iran ahead of its attacks - we have confirmation of this from US, Iranian, and Arab sources. The same reporting says the strike was one-off and now over, with the US seeking negotiations and explicitly denying intent to pursue regime change.
What about the damage? The Iranian authorities had already evacuated key sites and moved enriched uranium elsewhere. Early assessments show proven surface-level damage but no confirmed destruction of underground infrastructure. The Iranian nuclear program has not been "ended".
Excellent question by @vali_nasr. Here's a thread about Iran's nuclear program, why it's so hard to "destroy", and why "Fordow" is really about dragging the US into war:
Let's start with the basics. To have a nuclear program, a country needs:
- Uranium reserves
- The ability to mine ore & process it
- Centrifuges to enrich it
- Technical know-how to run the cycle
Iran has all of these *domestically*. Natively.
The way uranium is enriched is to first convert it into gas (UF₆) and then pass it through a cascade of centrifuges (which are basically fast-spinning cylinders) until it reaches a certain purity.
It's technically demanding, but not impossibly complicated.