Matt, the person behind @BondSuits , knows this, but I will do a thread building off of this question for others.
A lot of traditional menswear is about knowing how to read a garment based on its details. Whether you can wear an overcoat casually depends on its design. 🧵
Many of our dress traditions come from Britain, where elites divided their wardrobe between country and city. This is where we get "no brown in town." This means brown brogues were for sporting in the countryside; black oxfords for doing business in London.
So, when you think of formality, it helps to understand the distinction between city and country clothes. City clothes are things like dark worsted suits, white poplin shirts, and black oxfords. Country clothes are tweeds, brogues, and tattersalls.
City = formal
Country = casual
Whether you can wear an overcoat casually depends on its design.
One of the most classic city coats is the Chesterfield, which is a dark coat distinguished by its velvet collar and lack of a waist seam. This was worn over suits in the city. IMO, it is too formal for casualwear.
A guard's coat is one step down in formality. Although worn in the city, it's a pseudomilitary style like the greatcoat. Double-breasted with Martingale back, turnback cuffs, and flapped pockets. Modeled after coats worn by the Grenadier Guards (former regiment of Edward VIII).
I also find this to be too difficult to wear casually. IMO, it really calls for something like a suit or sport coat underneath.
However, the design looks less anachronistic than the velvet-collared Chesterfield. So many people will find this easier to wear in today's age.
Let's cross regions and go into the country.
The balmacaan is a raglan sleeve, single-breasted overcoat made with slash pockets and a small turndown collar. Named after a country estate in Scotland, it was historically worn over country clothes like tweed, hence the loose fit.
But its heritage as a country garment also means that it can be more easily worn with casualwear today. You can wear a bal coat with jeans, five-pocket cords, or chinos. As a loose fitting coat, however, you'll want something underneath to fill the space, like a chunky sweater.
The Loden coat is another country coat that's easy to wear casually. Traditionally worn by farmers and shepherds in the mountainous area of Tyrol, it's made from felted (often green) wool and features a deep pleat in the back. Popular w/ finance types in the '80s as "rus in urbe"
The Ulster coat is yet another country coat. Named after a region in Northern Ireland, it's traditionally made from a heavy, rough material like tweed and features a big collar that can be turned up and buttoned in blustery weather.
The distinction btw city and country doesn't allow us to read all of menswear history. Some things can't be so neatly categorized. For example, the polo coat was originally a wrap coat—later made with buttons—worn between periods of play in polo. Later made it off the field.
It's an American classic, now part of what's known as Ivy style. You can wear it over suits and sport coats, but also pair it w/ jeans and sweaters. The history of American clothing has always been about dressing things down. So the coat's history lends itself well to casualwear
I should note that this is a general guideline, not a hard rulebook. Liverano's Ulster is a traditional Irish Ulster made in a more formal cloth (often a navy woolen overcoating). Aesthetically, it looks quite close to a guard's coat, but works easily with suits or casualwear.
This guide also only covers classic menswear, not other forms of men's clothing. There are many possible types of long coats, which have their own design language and history, and thus work according to different logics.
But as a general rule of thumb, if you're looking at a classic design, and you're wondering, "Can I wear this casually?" it helps to think about the different levels of formality, starting with the distinction between country and city. Cloth, details, and history all play a part.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.