Matt, the person behind @BondSuits , knows this, but I will do a thread building off of this question for others.
A lot of traditional menswear is about knowing how to read a garment based on its details. Whether you can wear an overcoat casually depends on its design. 🧵
Many of our dress traditions come from Britain, where elites divided their wardrobe between country and city. This is where we get "no brown in town." This means brown brogues were for sporting in the countryside; black oxfords for doing business in London.
So, when you think of formality, it helps to understand the distinction between city and country clothes. City clothes are things like dark worsted suits, white poplin shirts, and black oxfords. Country clothes are tweeds, brogues, and tattersalls.
City = formal
Country = casual
Whether you can wear an overcoat casually depends on its design.
One of the most classic city coats is the Chesterfield, which is a dark coat distinguished by its velvet collar and lack of a waist seam. This was worn over suits in the city. IMO, it is too formal for casualwear.
A guard's coat is one step down in formality. Although worn in the city, it's a pseudomilitary style like the greatcoat. Double-breasted with Martingale back, turnback cuffs, and flapped pockets. Modeled after coats worn by the Grenadier Guards (former regiment of Edward VIII).
I also find this to be too difficult to wear casually. IMO, it really calls for something like a suit or sport coat underneath.
However, the design looks less anachronistic than the velvet-collared Chesterfield. So many people will find this easier to wear in today's age.
Let's cross regions and go into the country.
The balmacaan is a raglan sleeve, single-breasted overcoat made with slash pockets and a small turndown collar. Named after a country estate in Scotland, it was historically worn over country clothes like tweed, hence the loose fit.
But its heritage as a country garment also means that it can be more easily worn with casualwear today. You can wear a bal coat with jeans, five-pocket cords, or chinos. As a loose fitting coat, however, you'll want something underneath to fill the space, like a chunky sweater.
The Loden coat is another country coat that's easy to wear casually. Traditionally worn by farmers and shepherds in the mountainous area of Tyrol, it's made from felted (often green) wool and features a deep pleat in the back. Popular w/ finance types in the '80s as "rus in urbe"
The Ulster coat is yet another country coat. Named after a region in Northern Ireland, it's traditionally made from a heavy, rough material like tweed and features a big collar that can be turned up and buttoned in blustery weather.
The distinction btw city and country doesn't allow us to read all of menswear history. Some things can't be so neatly categorized. For example, the polo coat was originally a wrap coat—later made with buttons—worn between periods of play in polo. Later made it off the field.
It's an American classic, now part of what's known as Ivy style. You can wear it over suits and sport coats, but also pair it w/ jeans and sweaters. The history of American clothing has always been about dressing things down. So the coat's history lends itself well to casualwear
I should note that this is a general guideline, not a hard rulebook. Liverano's Ulster is a traditional Irish Ulster made in a more formal cloth (often a navy woolen overcoating). Aesthetically, it looks quite close to a guard's coat, but works easily with suits or casualwear.
This guide also only covers classic menswear, not other forms of men's clothing. There are many possible types of long coats, which have their own design language and history, and thus work according to different logics.
But as a general rule of thumb, if you're looking at a classic design, and you're wondering, "Can I wear this casually?" it helps to think about the different levels of formality, starting with the distinction between country and city. Cloth, details, and history all play a part.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.
After this post went viral, I called Caroline Groves, a world-class bespoke shoemaker, to discuss how women's shoes are made. I normally don't talk about womenswear, but I found the information interesting, so I thought I would share what I learned here. 🧵
Footwear is broadly broken into two categories: bespoke and ready-to-wear. In London, bespoke makers, including those for women, are largely focused on traditional styles, such as wingtip derbies and loafers. Emiko Matsuda is great for this.
In Paris, there's Massaro, a historic firm that has been operating since 1894, now owned by Chanel. Their designs are less about creating the women's equivalent of traditional men's footwear and more about things such as heels or creative styles. Aesthetic is still "traditional."
Earlier today, Roger Stone announced his partnership with a menswear company, where together they've released a collection of tailored clothing items.
Here is my review of those pieces. 🧵
The line is mostly comprised of suits and sport coats, supplemented with dress shirts and one pair of odd trousers (tailor-speak for a pair of pants made without a matching jacket). Suits start at $1,540; sport coats are $1,150. One suit is $5,400 bc it's made from Scabal fabric
Let's start with the good points. These are fully canvassed jackets, meaning a free floating canvas has been tacked onto the face fabric to give it some weight and structure. This is better than a half-canvas and fully fused construction, but requires more time and labor.