We're entering the 8th pandemic wave, likely surging to >2% infectious (>1 million cases/day) in a month.
Today's numbers:
🔹 1.41% (1 in 71) are infectious
🔹 >670,000 C0VID cases/day
🔹>34,000 #LongCovid cases/day
1/
Note that the different forecasting models show high convergence.
December 11 by the Numbers:
🔹 2.25% (1 in 44) likely to be infectious
🔹 >1 million anticipated C0VID cases/day
🔹>50,000 resulting #LongCovid cases/day
2/
Zooming out to the full #pandemic, there is no debate we're in an 8th U.S. C0VID wave, likely entering a "surge" in my view. That's not a word I take lightly.
There's more transmission than during 54% of pandemic days.
#MaskUp #VaxUp 😷💉
3/
How Does the Oncoming 8th Wave Compare with Prior Waves?
I suspect we’re headed somewhere between the magnitude of Wave 2 (winter 20-21) & Wave 6 (last winter). If so, I would characterize us as heading into a surge. I do not use the word “surge” lightly.
More... 4/
In comparing waves, I see a qualitative distinction at about 1 million daily infections (wastewater levels of 750 copies/mL).
Waves 1, 2, 3, and 7 all hovered around that mark. I refer to these as waves, not surges.
Wave 4, 5, and 6 all had sustained time periods of weeks with over 1 million infections per day. The “area under the curve” is substantially higher, and I refer to these as “surges.”
If one ventures to use this distinction, will Wave 8 be a wave like Waves 1, 2, 3, and 7, or more of a surge with sustained daily infections of >1 million per day?
Remember, the model uses a combination of historical data plus what is happening during the preceding 4 weeks. This means we will know best when a couple weeks out. Beyond 4 weeks, the model is relying heavily on historical data, and the three prior winters (Waves 2, 4, and 6) are very different. Wave 4 is an outlier among the waves, obviously. Wave 2 was more typical of a non-winter wave. Wave 6 (surge) piggybacked on Wave 5 (surge) and may have been unique in that regard due to any fleeting population-level immunity. My model suggests we’re headed toward a surge slightly bigger than last year, and I could see that, because any fleeting immunity from Wave 7 is likely less than that derived from Wave 5, and people are not up-to-date on vaccinations. Other behavioral precautions are similar for this versus last winter: mostly non-existent. However, the model does not capture any of that. It’s predicting worse (more infections) than last year because it’s influenced by the BA.1 wave.
Acknowledging that, I suspect we will peak slightly lower than Wave 6, perhaps around the 1.5 million infections/day rate. Anything between Wave 2 and a 20% bigger version of Wave 6, I would consider a reasonable estimate at this point.
Although only at the start of the 8th wave, transmission is already high on Nov 13.
Large groups amplify transmission. For example, in a group of 20, there's about a 25% chance someone would have infectious C19. In a large lecture hall, it's assumed.
5/
Here's an update on the danger of a #Thanksgiving gathering in the U.S. (Nov 23).
In a large gathering of 15-20 people, there's about a 25% chance someone would be infectious. I remain quite confident in these numbers, virtually identical to last week's forecast.
6/
Here's an updated estimate on the possible danger of a #Christmas gathering in the U.S. (Dec 25).
I am exceedingly cautious on posting long-range forecasts.
7/
More...
They are speculative and do not account for the highly-valuable near-term fluctuations that can occur, particularly if there's an immune-evasive variant.
Take these as my best point estimates nearly two months out, for illustrative purposes just so people get an idea of how bad things may be. Many people are booking trips now, so these rough estimates may be useful. These estimates are virtually identical to those in the forecast from last week.
In a small gathering of 9-10 people, there's about a 25% chance someone is infectious. Once you start looking at large family or multi-family gatherings that span 20-25 people, you basically begin to assume someone has infectious C19.
Here's the full PMC Dashboard for Nov 13.
You can read the full report at
Please share across other social media platforms. Much appreciated. 🙏
Today's Numbers:
🔹 1.27% (1 in 78) are infectious
🔹 >600,000 C0VID cases/day
🔹>30,000 #LongCovid cases/day
We will pass the late-summer wave's peak in just over a month.
1/
The different forecasting models reach a strikingly similar conclusion about where we'll be in a month: very bad.
November 27 by the Numbers:
🔹 1.76% (1 in 57) are infectious
🔹 >800,000 C0VID cases/day
🔹>40,000 #LongCovid cases/day
2/
Forecasting nuance:
Alt Model #1 (turtle) thinks the current real-time numbers are an underestimate, and it ignores the most recent week's data. Alt Model #2 (cheetah) accounts for recent errors in the real-time numbers; with low error, it maps on very closely to the real-time (red) line. The black line shows the composite used for reporting estimates. Note, everything converges in 4 weeks.
Zooming out to the full pandemic, you can see that we are entering the 8th wave.
Today, there is more transmission than during 50.6% of pandemic days. It's a coin toss as to whether any particular day of the pandemic has had more or less transmission than today. 😷💉 3/
New #LongCOVID article out today in one of the top science journals, @Nature.
The most striking finding to me was that more frequent vaccination reduced the risk of yearlong LC from the 4.3-5.2% range (in their sample, which is low) to just 0.38%. That's a >10x reduction.
1/
Their sample is at the low end of #LongCOVID estimates overall, so for a fairer comparison, I could imagine 20% of the under-vaccinated group with LC & about 2% in the more frequently vaxxed group.
We could quibble on the base rates, but the risk reduction is the key stat.
2/
I always advocate for multilayered mitigation because a 0.4-2% chance of a new severe disability is considerable for individuals and populations. Effects are cumulative. Also, vaccines wane, and evading variants emerge unpredictably. Forward transmission is common. Etc.
3/
PMC C0VID-19 Tracker, Oct 23, 2023
"As Good As It Gets"
U.S. #wastewater levels are higher than during 44% of the pandemic:
🔹 1.05% (1 in 95) are infectious
🔹 >500,000 C0VID cases/day
🔹>25,000 #LongCovid cases/day
Fall cases bottom out in 2 days or so. 1/
Zooming out from the 6-month view to the full pandemic, note that fall transmission is bottoming out at a high rate.
The U.S. 8th wave this winter will start to pick up soon, at a fast clip, and transmission will accelerate in December.
2/
With 1.05% of the U.S. population actively infectious (Oct 23), larger group activities continue to be increasingly risky.
Expect similar numbers the next two weeks. Then, activities will get much more dangerous.
Biobot (blue) versus Verily (black) #wastewater data.
You'll see Verily data suggest the most recent wave (#7) has had considerably more transmission than Delta (#3). And that last winter (#6) was similar (or worse!) than the prior winter's BA.1 surge (#4).
Who wins?
1/
Here are the correlations among Biobot levels, Verily levels, & IHME true cases for the 1st of each month from Jan '21 to Apr '23.
Biobot correlates r=.94 (freakish) with IHME. Verily only correlates r=.67.
Either Biobot is much better, or Verily knows something we don't. 2/
The CDC awarded Biobot's contract to Verily.
Once Verily brings on Biobot's former CDC-contracted wastewater sites, that should help. Case estimation will be easier if they fold in the historic data to more accurately represent the nation.