This appears to be another. A bigwig at a title insurance company.
I have read that Stacey is a niece in a couple of places, but it does seem that the Enrogon family takes care of its own, does it not? Good old NY nepotism!!
Interestingly, it appears the good Judge has two LinkedIn pages. Here is the one he uses as a judge.
And here is another LinkedIn profile for A. Engoron () where he shows experience as a "Judge" for FNZ New Access.
I suppose there could be two Arthur Engrorons out there, but I doubt there'd be two who went to The Wheatley School! linkedin.com/in/arthur-engo…
"With a significant number of local FNZ employees, Switzerland will become a key private banking competence center, driving the further expansion within this vertical."fnz.com
Is it odd that "Justice" Enrogon is moonlighting as a "Judge" for a Swiss-based private wealth management company?
Anyway, I'm sure it is nothing. That familial nepotism, familial support for BLM, and the moonlighting for private Swiss bankers must be TOTALLY above board.
Let's get back to the important work of investigating that pesky Trump family!
END
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Donald Trump has been making some very huge hints about what is in store for his next term in office. One of the most tantalising has bee this mentions of the power that tariffs have to fund the nation.
The implication is that tariffs could reduce or even eliminate the federal income tax.
What I am perceiving is Trump’s intention to return the USA to its proper constitutional foundations. He is pushing back against what I think of as the counter-revolutionary forces that ...
...produced our inflationary monetary system, the brutal administrative state (including our tortured and distorted medical systems), and the military-intelligence complex (all served by traitorous media).
I have been reflecting on the question of the most likely outcome for the Presidential election. Lots of others have been doing the same. This is my personal gut check and not a finely balanced prediction or analysis.
My take is pretty simple:
In 2016, Trump said he was going to win.
He won.
In 2020, he said they were going to steal it with a 3:00 am dirty trick.
At 3:00 am it happened.
As in, right at that moment. Spot on.
With this, Trump (for me) established a track record of reliable predictions of outcome.
If I use this as my reference and label everything else as "noise" (a big leap, I know, but I am zooming out for a gut check, not zooming in for deep analysis),...
My take on the horrific storm/flood damage in the southeast.
From the period of time after WW1 and extending until well after WW2, there was a Golden Age of investment and development of large scale infrastructure in the USA.
The most famous example of this would be Eisenhower's Interstate System, but this extended into massive flood control, water storage, hydroelectricity, irrigation, and other water management frameworks.
What followed was something like a half century of neglect.
Maintenance tapered off.
The neglect was most visible with that same example of Eisenhower's Interstate.
Please pressure your local Members of Parliament to protect NZ's kids.
Here is my latest attempt:
Scott
This clip is an extraordinarily bad look. An actual doctor suggesting that one"science" is his truth is completely antithetical to science itself.
I am having an interesting interaction with @allangmiller1 @MemberOfTheMass about the tools used to 'find' covid, i.e., sequencing, PCR, etc.
My assertion is that a simple explanation for all of the puzzling circumstances that I've observed over the past few years...
...is that the processes associated with finding/identifying/whatever the covid virus have been somehow gamed/corrupted/whatever.
The counter to this assertion is that such a thing is difficult to even imagine given the complexity of the processes/facilities/etc.
If one just assumes that the technologies are being properly used and the covid virus is being legitimately found, then one has to deal with puzzling circumstances like the vanishing of the flu, finding covid in asymptomatic people, etc.
Ever since 2020, a great deal of effort has been invested in trying to answer the question of what is to be done, what will be done, in response to an election that was so plainly and grossly destroyed by fraud of many sorts.
Scenarios were examined, some bland and some farfetched. Certain of those farfetched scenarios, like devolution, persist in the minds of many to this day.
While I have no idea what makes Trump so confident that MAGA will prevail in the face of obvious attempts to rig 2024,...
...and I have no idea what further attempts will be made by the deranged Democrats to throw a wrench into the works, I think we can see what is going to happen, at least in the view of SCOTUS.
There is a VERY long history of precedent with the courts and the question of...