Robin Monotti Profile picture
Nov 16 10 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.
The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism.
Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system.
Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

See slides from his talk on the thread below:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Watch John Clauser's full talk here:
CHALLENGING CLIMATE CLAIMS
churchmilitant.com/news/article/s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robinmonotti

Nov 17
🇺🇳 WE NEED JUST ONE UN STATE TO ACTIVATE THE GENOCIDE CONVENTION TO SAVE THE CIVILIANS OF GAZA, PALESTINE.
"It just needs one state to invoke the Genocide Convention and change the narrative and the international dynamic. That will only happen through the power of the people in pressing the idea on their governments. This is where everybody can do a little something to add to the pressure. Please do what you can." Craig Murray #InvokeGenocideConvention
Activating the Genocide Convention - Craig Murray

"The truth is that no state cares sufficiently about the thousands of Palestinian children already killed and thousands more who will shortly be killed, to introduce another factor of hostility in their relationship with the United States. Just as at this weekend’s summit in Saudi Arabia, where Islamic countries could not agree an oil and gas boycott of Israel, the truth is that those in power really do not care about a genocide in Gaza. They care about their own interests.

It just needs one state to invoke the Genocide Convention and change the narrative and the international dynamic. That will only happen through the power of the people in pressing the idea on their governments. This is where everybody can do a little something to add to the pressure. Please do what you can." Craig Murraycraigmurray.org.uk/archives/2023/…
Gaza: UN experts call on international community to prevent genocide against the Palestinian people

"GENEVA (16 November 2023) – Grave violations committed by Israel against Palestinians in the aftermath of 7 October, particularly in Gaza, point to a genocide in the making, UN experts said today. They illustrated evidence of increasing genocidal incitement, overt intent to “destroy the Palestinian people under occupation”, loud calls for a ‘second Nakba’ in Gaza and the rest of the occupied Palestinian territory, and the use of powerful weaponry with inherently indiscriminate impacts, resulting in a colossal death toll and destruction of life-sustaining infrastructure."ohchr.org/en/press-relea…
Read 4 tweets
Nov 9
This RT footage is claimed to be from the rave car park. Anybody who buys the corporate media account of October 7th, still needs to give a convincing explanation of how the al-Qassam brigades, who unless the border posts were open for them could only carry a few small weapons on paragliders, could have done this to this many cars parked at the rave? And if it was not them who did it, then who did it and why, and was this a proportionate response, and if not why not?
After just over 20 seconds you can see cars parked in rows.
This RT footage is claimed to be from the rave car park.
All the above could be the result of battle weapons fired from Apache helicopters. I would just like to see where in corporate media there is an acknowledgement that the vast majority of the Israeli victims of the October 7th attack were most likely killed by the IDF and not by the Al-Qasssam brigades?

Is there a single article on Western corporate media that states this clearly?

If there is, please post below:
Read 6 tweets
Nov 8
AL AQSA CONTEXT:
They want us to focus on the date of October 7th. But before October 7th, there was October 4th. This is what happened on October 4th 2023:
"Thousands of settlers have been carrying out provocative tours of the mosque complex following calls by ultranationalist Jewish groups.. Police imposed age restrictions and prevented young Palestinians from entering the mosque during the incursions, witnesses told the Anadolu news agency."

Muslims consider the Al Aqsa mosque as Islam's third holiest place after Mecca and Medina.

Before October 4th 2023, there was May 2021.
"Deif started planning the attack [October 7th] in May 2021 after the Arab and Muslim world were left enraged by a raid carried out by Israel on Al Aqsa mosque: "It was triggered by scenes and footage of Israel storming Al Aqsa mosque during Ramadan, beating worshippers, attacking them, dragging elderly and young men out of the mosque. All this fuelled and ignited the anger," a source was quoted as saying in Gaza."
Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 7
TURMOIL AT THE BBC:
BBC Beirut correspondent to the Director General of the BBC, Tim Davie:
"Dear Tim,
I am writing to raise the gravest possible concerns about the coverage of the BBC, especially on English outlets, of the current fighting between Israel and Palestinian factions. 
It appears to me that information that is highly significant and relevant is either entirely missing or not being given due prominence in coverage.
This includes expert opinion that Israel’s actions could amount to genocide, evidence in support of that opinion, and historical context without which the public cannot form a basic understanding of the unfolding events. 
There are also indications that the BBC is—implicitly at least—treating Israeli lives as more worthy than Palestinian lives, and reinforcing Israeli war propaganda. 
What follows is a brief explanation of why I think so. I hope you consider it carefully and urgently.  
1. Genocide
Even before the current round of fighting, experts have noted that the siege of Gaza may amount to "a prelude to genocide" or "a slow-motion genocide." [1]
Key here is the fact that the Genocide Convention of 1948 lists, among the elements of the crime of genocide, the act of "Deliberately inflicting on the (national, ethnical, racial or religious) group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part." [2]
Also key is the fact that as early as 2014, UN officials who advise the UN Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide have warned of ‘the flagrant use of hate speech in the social media, particularly against the Palestinian population.[3]
The nature of the Israeli response to the attack by Hamas on October 7 has prompted ‘over 800 scholars and practitioners of international law, conflict studies and genocide studies’ to warn of ‘the possibility of genocide being perpetrated by Israeli forces against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.[4]
They cited the "incessant and indiscriminate bombardment’ obliterating ‘huge swathes of neighborhoods and entire families," and the order, by the Israeli defense minister" of a "complete siege" of Gaza, terminology which, according to the experts, "indicates an intensification of an already illegal, potentially genocidal siege to an outright destructive assault."
They also cited the order issued for more than 1.1 million Palestinians in Gaza City and the northern Gaza Strip to flee to the south.[5] This order has also been said by Jan Egeland, Secretary General of the Norwegian Refugee Council to ‘amount to the war crime of forcible transfer’ if unaccompanied by guarantees of safety or return.[6]
Furthermore, the scholars noted the statements of incitement by Israeli leaders against Palestinians.[7] They wrote of "evidence of incitement to genocide" and a "wider Israeli discourse showcasing the intent for elimination and genocide against the Palestinian people."
They also noted the "escalation of violence, arrests, expulsions, and destruction of whole Palestinian communities in the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem."
They said: 
As scholars and practitioners of international law, conflict studies, and genocide studies, we are compelled to sound the alarm about the possibility of the crime of genocide being perpetrated by Israeli forces against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. We do not do so lightly, recognizing the weight of this crime, but the gravity of the current situation demands it.
I invite you to sift through our coverage, past and present, for any trace of the above; whether in explainers, or interviews, or features, or news analysis. Is it there at all, and if so, is it given the prominence it deserves? >>
Image
"2. Selective Use of Language
Words like ‘massacre’, ‘slaughter’, and ‘atrocities’ are being used—prominently—in reference to actions by Hamas, but hardly, if at all, in reference to actions by Israel. 

When the BBC uses such language selectively, with the standard of selection being the identity of the perpetrators/victims, the BBC is making a statement—albeit implicit. It implies that the lives of one group of people are more valuable than the lives of another.

This would be scandalous under any conditions. How much more so in light of the fact that hate speech and incitement against Palestinians have been flooding the airwaves, the internet, and social media, coming from the top (Israeli officials and their Western backers) and echoing all over the information ecosystem, in the context of what experts believe could be a prelude to genocide?

The power of emotive coverage and repetition is well understood. The selective application of emotive repetition is sure to have an impact on audiences, and it is exactly the kind of impact Israeli propagandists are aiming for as they dehumanize Palestinians and set the stage for the mass murder they have pledged—and begun—to carry out.

Does this not raise the question of the possible complicity of the BBC in incitement, dehumanization, and war propaganda? How would the BBC respond to this?"
"3. Interviewing Officials

In light of all the above, interviews with Israeli officials and their Western backers—as well as with Israeli propagandists—cannot possibly be friendly affairs, with presenters not only refraining from presenting them with evidence of the above, but also giving them comfortable airtime as they justify it. This is happening all too often, and as far as I know, the expert opinion above and the evidence that backs it have not been presented to Israeli or Western officials on air.

The question of finding exceptions (if there are any) is not enough. Rigorous and challenging interviews should not be the exception, they should be the rule."
Read 5 tweets
Nov 5
When all these brands see a dramatic loss of profits, the bombings will stop. Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 3
MY TAKE ON THE ISRAEL-GAZA WAR
Other regional powers got Hamas to start a war to prevent BOTH Palestine's huge gas reserves off Gaza being stolen by Netanyahu AND the Ben Gurion canal from being built. It's got NOTHING to do with the resistance of Palestinians. You have to be a romantic and naïve resistance mythologist to believe it has.

Netanyahu allowed the October 7th attacks if not encouraged them because he wants a simple land grab in order to save his political career and himself from jail. The US also want the land so that all the Palestinian gas would go to Israel, and be what is used to supply the whole of Europe: Israel as the new Russia becoming the main supplier of gas to Europe. That is why the war for the US-UK-EU has to be quick, meaning immense numbers of civilian casualties on the Gaza side, nothing to do with "human shields", that's a clear misrepresentation for the real reason why the war has to be quick.

The Ben Gurion canal's actual route in diagrams does not make sense. It would make much more sense if it cut through Gaza, and would make it much cheaper, and separate Gaza from Israel: another wall. Netanyahu therefore will only move into the north of Gaza, or as far as he can go, and that will be where the canal will be built over time.

The problem for me is that our own governments are actively encouraging and participating in ethnic cleansing, and thousands of civilians and children are being killed, and our governments are highly complicit, if not directly participating in ETHNIC CLEANSING and therefore under the GENEVA CONVENTION and the ROME STATUTE deserve a Nuremberg 2.0 trial for this alone. They can't remain in power after this.
Image
Believing that Netanyahu is fighting Hamas and not the people of Gaza, meaning ethnic cleansing, is at a similar level of naivëty as believing lockdowns, masks and mRNA injections were about a cold virus. That some saw the first psyop but fell for the second simply show that psyops, aka the weaponisation of trauma, actually do work if the trauma is unresolved, and fear and hate of the Other are present there.
Discovered in 2000, there are extensive gas reserves off the Gaza coastline:
"It should be noted that 60 percent of the gas reserves along the Gaza-Israel coastline belong to Palestine.The BG Group drilled two wells in 2000: Gaza Marine-1 and Gaza Marine-2. Reserves are estimated by British Gas to be of the order of 1.4 trillion cubic feet, valued at approximately 4 billion dollars. These are the figures made public by British Gas. The size of Palestine’s gas reserves could be much larger.
Who Owns the Gas Fields?
The issue of sovereignty over Gaza’s gas fields is crucial. From a legal standpoint, the gas reserves belong to Palestine. The death of Yasser Arafat, the election of the Hamas government and the ruin of the Palestinian Authority have enabled Israel to establish de facto control over Gaza’s offshore gas reserves. British Gas (BG Group) has been dealing with the Tel Aviv government. In turn, the Hamas government has been bypassed in regards to exploration and development rights over the gas fields. In 2006, British Gas “was close to signing a deal to pump the gas to Egypt.” (Times, May, 23, 2007). According to reports, British Prime Minister Tony Blair intervened on behalf of Israel with a view to shunting the agreement with Egypt.
Gaza and Energy Geopolitics
The military occupation of Gaza is intent upon transferring the sovereignty of the gas fields to Israel in violation of international law."
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(