@P_J_Buckhaults The reason this is a Holy Sh$t is that the resolution and sensitivity is a game changer.
They dont need to load up 100X the dose to track this.
@P_J_Buckhaults Would be nice if they looked at Ovaries/Testes
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe Matthew is too incompetent to map reads.
If he could map reads he’d realize Chakraborty doesn’t need peer review because he is using data from 2 peer reviewed papers.
Doah.
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe DNA doesn’t need to get into the nucleus to cause problems.
But it does.
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe It binds to P53
Drayman et al
This is a dense read but it will help you to understand why the DNA fluorometer data is lighting up so much on modRNA. This is much more cross-talk than you see with traditional ssRNA.
That is because these are intercalating dyes that bind to minor grooves are only found in double stranded nucleic acids.
The fact that RNaseA is showing such a reduction in signal is because the RNA isnt single stranded.
At least half of it is digestable by a dsRNA specific nuclease known as RNaseIII.
Another portion responds to RNaseH which only digests RNA in RNA:DNA hybrids.
The fraction that responds to RNAseIII should worry you. Your cells have RNaseIII and its the start of the RNA interference pathway.
To make matters worse, Pharma is using an ELISA that is blind to dsRNA <400bp. It cant see this problem. And they know it exists