I'd be willing to bet that once he bought Twitter, and once he decided that he was going to incorporate free speech into his business plans, that Musk allocated a substantial sum of money to the lawfare that was inevitable.
Media Matters/Soros are about to find out what happens when they open the door to litigation in an especially obnoxious, odious, and obvious manner, and offend the ideology and business interests of the richest man on Earth.
And despite their connections and infiltrations into various levels of government, Media Matters/Soros are about to find out what it is like to come into open conflict with a man whose businesses are directly integrated into deeply strategic aspects of USA defence systems.
SpaceX IS the USA's means to enter space. Tesla is THE growth automaker in the nation. The core and spinoff technologies of these companies are vastly, profoundly important to the nation's security and future prosperity. There is no comparison with the necrotic influence...
...held by Soros and his minions.
Musk has the Constitution on his side, he holds the moral imperative, and he is FAR better at the PR side of the battle.
He is going to wipe the floor with these corrupt demons.
END
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Disclaimer: I am NOT a lawyer. Not one little bit.
Chauvin’s appeal pertained to issues associated with a fair trial, i.e., whether pre-trial media coverage and a failure to sequester the jury sufficiently tainted the trial...
...to justify review by SCOTUS.
SCOTUS declined.
People started losing their minds.
This should not have surprised anyone.
There are ample opportunities for SCOTUS to address these issues via other less polarising cases. Further, taking the case would have put SCOTUS front...
...and centre in the limelight with a case that holds the potential to set alight civil unrest right in the middle of arguably the most important federal election in generations.
I have no patience for those who suggest there is a problem with THE Jews without specifying which Jews about which they are speaking of.
But:
There is no denying that there are mafias and cabals of people who identify as Jews in, for example,...
...the finance, entertainment, and media sectors that work actively to cause harm while massively enriching themselves.
There are members of my own family who are Jewish and I am pretty confident that they are neither receiving globalist royalty checks, nor are they...
...actively oppressing Palestinians or anyone else.
Bottom line, I feel that if you are going to address the problem of these mafias and cartels, you must be very specific about those who are doing the harm.
But this task is not always easy. Those in the mafias and cabals...
"Retribution" is aninteresting word, one with a widely varying definition.
Merriam Webster:
1
: RECOMPENSE, REWARD
2
: the dispensing or receiving of reward or punishment especially in the hereafter
3
: something given or exacted in recompense
especially : PUNISHMENT
This appears to be another. A bigwig at a title insurance company.
I have read that Stacey is a niece in a couple of places, but it does seem that the Enrogon family takes care of its own, does it not? Good old NY nepotism!!
What exactly is going on here and what has to happen?
I have seen frustration with Speaker Johnson’s recent comments regarding the insufficiency of evidence for an impeachment process at the moment.
How can this be? How can he be so tone deaf? There are copies of...
...freaking checks made out to him, for goodness’ sake!
The answer is not that Johnson is weak or corrupt. The answer is not that there is insufficient evidence to impeach Biden. The answer is that impeaching Biden is not the point at all.
I wrote earlier that I believe...
...freaking checks made out to him, for goodness’ sake!
The answer is not that Johnson is weak or corrupt. The answer is not that there is insufficient evidence to impeach Biden. The answer is that impeaching Biden is not the point at all.
This is an extremely interesting story at the moment.
For some reason, Winston Peters, a politician who is the only reasonably genuine populist/nationalist party leader in NZ politics, has chosen this moment to kick off a new controversy.
Either the official narrative is correct and the only foreknowledge that the Ardern government had of the mosque attack was an email sent minutes before the events of that day, or Peters knows something else.
Peters is no fool.
This accusation comes just as negotiations...
...for power sharing are to commence as final numbers on the NZ election are to be released on Nov 3rd.
National and ACT, the other two parties to be in government, were neck deep into other narratives, i.e., covid, and gave little resistance to the draconian...