1. #Russian volunteers reported testing thermal cameras and night-vision cameras on their #drones. These cameras are very effective in the long & cool winter nights. What is the difference between night-vision and thermal cameras?
2. The drone has a single video transmitter and can only show video from one #camera at a time. An electronic switch is used to select which camera’s video is transmitted. This provides simple multi-spectral capability. t.me/FPV_vyZOV/377
3a. It is important not to confuse night vision image intensifiers with night-vision cameras. Image intensifiers are analog devices that produce a distinctive green or blue-green image. There is no reason to use one of these on a FPV drone. t.me/usinfantryman1…
3b. Here, an image intensifier is used to produce a distinctive blue-green image of the night sky. Likely, a phone camera was placed against the eyepiece.
4. Most cameras use a CMOS sensor (shown here) to capture images. These sensors can be inexpensive and have good performance. Importantly, all CMOS sensors are sensitive to near-infrared light and could, in principle, be used for night vision.
5. However, most cameras also have an internal filter that blocks infrared light. Shown here is a lens from a webcam. There is a filter mounted on the end closest to the CMOS sensor.
6. Without the filter, images would look strange. This is best illustrated with a security camera that has a night-vision mode where the infrared filter moves out of the way. Note how trees and lawn appear too bright when there is no filter.
7. A common way to increase the low-light performance of a camera is to use a large, fast lens like the one shown here. This lens has a large diameter, short focal length and is a very fast f/0.95. Astronomers & photographers routinely use these lenses.
8. A very big and fast lens can capture a very nice image of the night sky. But lenses meant for full-size cameras are expensive and much too heavy for a small FPV drone. Regardless, expect a camera meant for low light use to a have a larger lens.
9. There are CMOS night-vision cameras for drones. The example shown here uses (as expected) a very fast f/1.0 lens. These cameras are low cost and have good low-light performance. These are not thermal cameras but rely on ambient light, e.g., moonlight.
10. Thermal cameras often use sensors based on Vanadium Oxide (Vox) and have exquisite sensitivity to infrared radiation. These usually have a lower pixel count than CMOS ones. Germanium lenses are used because glass won’t transmit infrared radiation.
11. People emit infrared radiation because they are warm. The plot shows the amount of radiation emitted versus wavelength. Thermal cameras are very sensitive to radiation in the 7 µm to 14 µm range and will easily see a person even in complete darkness.
12. The advantage of thermal cameras is that they detect the infrared radiation emitted by people, vehicles and buildings. Thus, they work extremely well in complete darkness. t.me/zedigital/3703
13. Thermal cameras are available for small drones. A big disadvantage is their cost, e.g., 20 times the price of a night vision camera. A thermal camera can more than double the cost of a small FPV drone. (Note the distinctive reflective lens.)
14. Night vision and thermal cameras greatly enhance the capabilities of small drones and are in very high demand in Ukraine. For example, the folks at @FPVDronesUa discuss installing these cameras on the drones they provide.
15. Coupled with extra hardware, e.g., a FPGA, these cameras could provide a way for a drone to home-in on a target. This is not AI, it’s just image processing and programming. A semi-autonomous kamikaze would be straightforward and a bomber a bit harder. t.me/serhii_flash/1…
16. Night vision cameras & thermal camera are powerful technologies. Expect to see more developments in how these are being used in Ukraine.
If you enjoyed this thread please read my previous posts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. A good defense against a drone is another drone. Both Ukraine and russia are developing net launchers that tangle an enemy drone’s propellers. Shown here is a russian-designed net launcher made largely from 3D-printed components. These are carried by a drone.
2. When triggered, four springs eject four weights that are attached to the net. The net simply hangs below this launcher. The release is a ring that slides upwards when moved by a servo.
3. This gives a better view of the release mechanism. The release is a ring that prevents the 4 weights from being ejected by the springs. This ring is connected to the servo via a link. The servo can then pull the release ring upwards along the cylindrical body of the launcher.
1. There was a pleasant and interesting surprise today when Ukraine announced a new drone missile called Peklo (Hell). It will take a while to analyse this weapon but there are a number of intriguing design elements.
2. This photo gives a good idea of its size. Range is reported as over 700 km so this drone must hold a very large fuel tank. The size of the warhead will likely depend on the required range. Speed is reported as over 700 km/h (435 mph).
3. The most obvious detail is the engine is mounted on top of the drone. This engine is similar to the PBS TJ40 but could be customised for this drone. The external engine greatly simplifies the design and also allows a different make or model of engine to be used.
1. A curious Ukrainian drone that crashed in September, 2024 was widely reported in russian media. Although various folks claimed this wreckage showed the remains of a jet engine, things did not look right.
2. Here is a closer view of this object. The trouble is that most jet engines used in drones do not look like this. If not an engine, what is this? The following photographs will (partially) explain what this is.
3. This is a rare photo showing an intact example of this jet-powered drone. Wing span is roughly 3 m (10 feet). The airframe is made from carbon fibre. The overall design is really intriguing.
1. Mystery solved, sort of. Early in 2024 a number of strange drones crashed in russia: a typical wreckage is shown here. I spent a lot of time trying to determine who made these but recently the manufacturer publicity announced this drone 🙃. Regardless, here is what I found.
2. It’s not a secret but it is an interesting design. The fuselage is a carbon-fibre cylinder with fancy aluminum bulkheads. Wings and V-tail are composite construction with foam and wood internal structures. This is an expensive airframe compared to some other drones.
3. This photo gives an idea of its size. The power & programming ports are visible here. Intact propellers indicate these 2 drones crashed because the engines were not running. There are very nice mounts for the wings & tail fins.
1. Ukrainian cities have been targeted by thousands of russian Shahed-136 (Geranium-2) drones. Although Ukraine has flown plenty of long-range drones into russia, it did not have a drone similar to the Shahed-136. But it might have one now.
2. There is no single good photo of this drone so I made this rough sketch to give an idea what it looks like. Conceptually, it is very similar to the Shahed-136. The Ukrainian drone may have a larger diameter fuselage and be a bit shorter but it is hard to be certain.
3. In July 2024, one of these drones crashed in russia resulting in a couple of photos. This is the underside of the engine as the drone's exhaust points upwards. The engine has a bracket added that is likely a prop guard. Note the electric start on this single-use engine.
1. A hinge from a Shahed-136 kamikaze drone tells a story. The russians call this drone the Geranium-2. Here, a worker sketched a geranium before the drone was assembled, telling us this drone was likely assembled in russia not Iran. This photo was posted by @ConnieLingus123
2. This hinge appears to be well designed, likely after several iterations of refinement. The overall design is such that the left and right sides are identical or almost identical. This makes production easier as there are fewer unique components.
3. Two large plates are probably cut from stainless steel sheet, possibly using a waterjet. There are two aluminum components that are likely made with die casting to avoid expensive machining.