The 'Conservative' Party is in far more trouble than widely reported in the press. They face near wipeout at the next election, losing in the process a great deal of their Parliamentary talent (such as it is). Let's crunch numbers to show what a mess they're in.
1/n
It's well known that Tory polling numbers are disastrous. The Politico poll of polls has them on only 24% and Labour on 45% (left chart). These are the worst numbers since the Brexit constitutional crisis and related Parliamentary impasse before the 2019 election (right).
2/n
But what's much less well accepted is just what a catastrophe that would be in terms of seats. The superb @PollingReportUK suggests the Conservatives could fall to 198 seats, with Labour on 354, a stunning majority of 156. Yet this forecast does not account for the...
3/n
...most recent polling. @PollingReportUK has the Tories on 26% (left), because he has no November polling in his model (right). The most recent polls have the Tories on 19%, which dragged down the above Politico average to 24%, and would surely reduce the seat projection.
3/n
A year or so ago, the Tories could at least console themselves that Rishi Sunak was personally more popular than the party, and personal leadership popularity is often important in British elections. Yet his numbers are also declining from +4 approve to -22 disapprove.
4/n
But it gets worse for the Tories. Reform is currently at 9% in the poll of polls. As Mr Sunak steers his government toward SW1 centrism, it is conceivable that they could pick up more. And as the ever-perceptive @oflynnsocial has pointed out, if Nigel Farage returned...
5/n
...to lead them, it would not be difficult "to envisage 15 or even 20% vote shares being recorded." It has happened before. Last time an SW1 Centrist Tory government seemed to be drifting from problem to problem, Reform (then The Brexit Party) polled at 22% under Farage.
6/n
Even 15% would probably be enough to sink the Conservative Party, given the First Past the Post system. Let's look at some constituencies at the 2019 election to explain why. In Sunderland Central (below), The Brexit Party likely robbed the Tories, despite finishing third.
7/n
Further, Reform votes would not be evenly distributed. In Barnsley Central, for example, The Brexit Party managed to finish second with over 30% of the vote (below). If @TiceRichard and (potentially) Mr Farage have sense, they'll do serious damage in individual seats.
8/n
Worse still, these numbers come *before* Britain enters recession. Given key European economies are already contracting, and given UK construction activity is down, and unemployment up, it seems recession is on the way. This will make it even...
...more difficult for the Tories to claw back in the polls. The record number of seats was Labour's 418 in 1997. This gave Labour a 179 seat majority. We are now in the zone where a similar result is possible at the next election. In fact, @ElectCalculus forecasts that...
10/n
...the result will be even worse than 1997 for the Tories, with Labour winning 441 seats and the Conservatives reduced to 135 (which would probably go down as the worst election result for more than a hundred years). Yet few political commentators seem to have recognised...
11/n
...the stark truth that the Tories are on course for an epochal defeat. Intrinsic to this, a great many of their more prominent names represent at risk seats that look likely to fall. I'm sure there are more, but a cursory scan of well known Tory MPs and their majorities...
12/n
...gives:
Theresa Villiers (2.1%)
Iain Duncan Smith (2.6%)
Dominic Raab (4.4%)
Steve Baker (7.7%)
Jonny Mercer (11.1%)
Graham Brady (11.2%)
Lee Anderson (11.7%)
John Redwood (11.9%)
Mariam Cates (14.5%)
Jeremy Hunt (14.6%)
Grant Shapps (21.1%).
CONCLUSION BELOW ⤵️
13/n
No political commentator who claims to have serious views on the future of British politics -- and Britain -- should ignore this. For instance, a vicious battle for the soul of the Conservative Party will take place after the election. But it will be decided by those...
14/n
...who avoided the great election cull. That matters, as key members of one faction or another might lose their seats. Equally what legislation would a Starmer Ministry with a huge majority pass, because they'll be able to push through almost anything?
ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It cost £1 million in legal, prison and deportation costs to remove this gang rapist from the UK after his original deportation flight was stopped by passengers in 2018. There are so many things this says about the UK that we are going to have to take them one at a time.
🧵1/n
First, it shows how a system of treaties, national legislation, judicial interpretation and international obligations serves to hobble efforts to get even the most wicked offenders deported. You can read how this works in the attached thread.
Secondly, it shows the cost of not stopping the small boats. Once they're in, it's hugely difficult to remove them and massively expensive to remove them. £1 million sometimes sounds abstract, and we forget that that's teachers and nurses we couldn't employ. A high cost.
3/n
Since Suella Braverman's incendiary departure letter to the PM on Tuesday, and especially after the Supreme Court decision yesterday, we've been told that the government cannot stop the the #channel small boats under current UK Law. Why?
First, some samples to give an idea of the scale of the issue.
In 2021, 72% of those who arrived on the South Coast of England in small boats were granted asylum. This rate of acceptance is nearly three times the rate in France. Even those who are rejected have a good...
2/n
...chance of making Britain their home. Most Channel migrants are housed in hotels while their claims are processed. In 2016, when there were fewer claims, 56,000 absconded. As far back as 2017, it was accepted that those living and working illegally in Britain...
3/n
A thread offering a little vignette on how ruined Britain is, and how that ruination is caused by a dreadful political class.
[N.B. SO COMMONPLACE IS THIS SORT OF PROBLEM THAT YOU WILL NOT BE SHOCKED; HOWEVER, WHEN YOU STOP AND THINK, YOU'LL BE APPALLED]
🧵 [1/n]
This morning, I listened to the West Yorkshire Council Questions to the Mayor. @Wayne_Dixon, the @SDPhq Councillor for Middleton and Belle Isle, asked the (Labour) mayor whether she could work toward restoring trust in the police. Mr Dixon's constituents have repeatedly...
[2/n]
...told him that they do not bother to report crime or anti social behaviour anymore because the police don't respond. They've simply lost trust in the willingness of the police to deal with crime or maintain order. In response, the mayor said that while trust in the...
There has been a huge buzz about this brilliant @Tinkzorg essay for @compactmag_, focused on the tragedy of US realists like @ElbridgeColby. Must read stuff: it's penetrating and beautifully written. Nevertheless, I'm going to disagree with its core point. First...
[1/n]
...@Tinkzorg offers a scrupulously fair, balanced, steel-man synopsis of @ElbridgeColby's view of US grand strategy, and specifically with regard to China. Mr Colby's book, The Strategy of Denial, writes @Tinkzorg, "is long, carefully written, and meticulously argued..."
[2/n]
But what does Colby argue? Mainly, that China is the greatest ever danger to the US global position. Why? Because if China comes to dominate East Asia, likely the centre of global economic gravity in the 21stC, it will be able to challenge the US everywhere, as at least...
🧵It's looking increasingly likely that one day, the US is going to wake up and find Taiwan on China's side of the ledger. From there, the entire First Island Chain would become increasingly untenable, and with it any hope that the US could prevent China, over time, from...
...gaining the sort of regional hegemony that the US enjoys. This would not allow China to dominate the world, but it would allow China to compete with the US on even terms, and eventually, given the region China would dominate would be the centre of...
...global economic gravity, China would become the senior of the two superpowers. It's clear that the foreign policy of the current US administration is consumed by Ukraine, formed as it is by a faction who seem pathologically obsessed by Russia. And, in its desire to trap and...
I urge everybody to read this brief Peter Hitchens essay on Iraq and the war in Ukraine. It uses admirably clear English to convey a refreshing - and sadly often missing - subtlety and complexity of the issue. And, if the cat may look at the king, I...
...would offer a certain more hopeful answer to Mr Hitchens's final question: "Is it war itself that these idealists want: Iraq then, Russia now, who knows where next?" Yes, that is what 'these idealists' want - and above all with Russia, a nation with which they are obsessed...
...and toward which they direct a seemingly pathological loathing. However, their rise to control of the levers US foreign policy (both at Foggy Bottom and within the nebulous but powerful NGO, lobbying, academic, think tank and journalism IR grouping) was facilitated by the...