A rendering of the manifestation of supreme shakti navAtmikA of the pashchimAMnAya. The Agama explains the emergence of the navAtmikA form thus in the teaching of umA to shiva:
shashA~NkArdha-kalA j~neyA ambikA madhyachandrikA |
ekA eva parAshaktis tridhA sA cha prajAyate ||
The goddess ambikA manifest in the midst of the half-moon triplicated herself (technically the central triangle of the yantra). This triad of goddess are the shakti-s vAmA, jyeShThA and raudrI, corresponding to the first 3 deities of the vAmadeva-brahma-mantra
ebhyo yukta-viyuktebhyaH saMjAtA nava-varga-jA |
navadhA cha tridhA sA tu nava-vargAkShamAlikA ||
These 3 combine and disjoin i.e., 3 x 3 to birthing her 9 fold form. She of 9 & 3 fold forms is the 9 fold rosary of Sanskrit letters. This latter reckconing while differing among
teachers, can be interpreted thus: 1 vowels; 2-6: velar, palatal, retroflex, dental, labial consonants; 7 half-vowels; 8 sibilants; 9 aspirate. When they are all expanded, she becomes the 50-fold mAlinI of the pUrvAMnAya. These letters are said to form the basis of 5-brahma-s
pa~ncha-mantra-gatA deva sadyAdInAM yathAkramam |
tena sA pa~nchadhA proktA j~nAtvayA suranAyaka ||
She manifests in order as the 5 mantra-s starting with sadyojAta; that is 5-fold form. The tantra also describes her as assuming other forms: the 4 fold form is said to be that of
chaturbhaginI-s the goddesses of the vAmasrotas. Then she also assumes the form of the 11 rudrANI-s who go back to the yajurveda, famously invoked in the aruNaketuka-chayana. However, in the bhairava-srotas they have special significance related to the explosive kuNDalinI arousal
tena tena kraMeNaiva raudrI-bhAvam upAgatA |
kandAdhAra-purasthA tu dhunanAveshanI smR^itA ||
The 11 rudrANI-s: 1. kandAdhAra-purasthA: the one residing in the mUlAdhara; 2. dhunanA: the shaking; 3. AveshanI: causing various signs of possession.
4. kampanI: trembling; 5. ghUrmaNI: causing whirling around; 6. udbhavAtmikA: causing upward levitation/ rising to higher levels of perception; 7. ekA~nga-nartanI: dancing on one limb
8. ashrupAtI: causing tears to flow; 9. kura~NgiNI: causing leaping like an antelope;
siMha-shabdI pulindI cha ekAdasha prakIrtitAH |
rudrabhAge sthitA hy ete dvAdashAnte layaM gatAH || 10. siMha-shabdI: causing roaring like a lion; 11 pulindI:-> vision of subterranean realms
Interestingly, 2 of the 12 kaumAra-mAtrR^i-s in the bodhAyanokta-skanda-yAga are named AveshinI & ashrumukhI, paralleling the rudrANI-s of this list.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The mUlavAtUla-marUnmatta-yuddha has shades of "Gujarat" in it. Soon after the marUnmatta-s burnt down H in lATa, their propaganda machinery aided & abetted by the mlechCha-s made it all about them forgetting who were the cause. This was reproduced in the current conflict & some
of piNDaka's backers, the same ones who are ranged against the H, are now threatening to withdraw their support to him if he goes with the mUla-s.Some of the latter who were in the anti-H ranks (including some whom the H were foolishly simping for) are now getting a real taste of
their marUnmattAdi friends. On one hand, this kolAhala among piNDaka's backers is good for the H but on the other it also give a preview of how the marU-navyonmatta alliance will act against them when the time of the nirNaya comes. As we have said before none of the trayonmAda-s
I mostly concur. Over the years I have realized that genetic determinism is a much bigger factor that abrahamo-occidentally conditioned minds like to admit. I see two vectors that might have an angle of up to 30 degs between them: 1. intrinsic religiosity & 2. sense of group ID
The best situation for a group is when there is a greater alignment between these vectors & they have a large magnitude. IMO, H tend to have relatively low alignment and moderate magnitude of the group ID vector. Thus, it is common (especially in South India) where there has been
shielding due to vijayanagara & marahaTTa-s encounter folks who have moderately strong religiosity vector but weak group ID vector which are not strongly aligned either or vice versa with the group ID coming from the Dravidian languages. I suspect in fission-fusion ape societies
Comparing the J and the H responses in the final phase of their movements for independence, the armed struggle played a critical role in both cases. Savarkar was correct in urging the H youth “to gain practice” for the impending war by participating in WW2. In the case of the J a
related idea went back to Trumpeldor, who gained experience serving the Russians. Later, many J gained experience in Polish units during WW2. This really gave their armed struggle considerable muscle and allowed them to form the ISR military as soon as the English left. After WW2
they carried out numerous attacks, killing English and their Arab or J collaborators and even took the fight to England. This was sort of like the naval revolt among the H happening at the same time. While previously the Brits would have engaged in their usual genocidal actions
It is unclear if the marUnmatta-s had any strategy in their current ghazwat. It was heavy on tactical effervescence -- something also previously seen with their coreligionist from the occupied pA~nchanada& sindhu -- but not clear if it aimed to achieve anything strategically
It that sense it was just like the 9/11 attack -- mass civilian deaths for shock value that will draw the attention of the world. While such a shock value is deeply engrained in the principle of the jihad since its founder, these attacks seem slightly different from say the
Kenyan mall ghazwat or 26/11. In the former, there seems to have been a strategic objective directed at Kenya. I also see 26/11 as a deliberate attempt by the marUnmatta-s to paralyze a H economic center and take the sheen of "Indian growth". Along with the shock value the
Thanks. Multiple people have asked for prompts behind our recent posts. I'll just mention something general in that regard. First, imagine what you want -- that is based on your knowledge of the intended composition. Describe it in words to the engine. The key to note is that
this implementation of DALL-E 3 in MS image generator is not like MidJourney. It does not perform mutations on an earlier generated image. So there is randomness: 1. Some of the prompts fail but slight tweaks to the statement while maintaining semantics gives better results.
2. just repeating the same prompt a 2nd time sometimes works better. 3. There are lots of "heartbreaks" -- a near-perfect image ruined by a single irredeemable flaw -- if only we could engineer or mutate these we could get even better productions. I keep those that come near to
@JoraShankara @Sapratha 2. Harappan being Dravidian is a rather unfounded claim; hence, I think Steve Bonta is correct in dispelling rather strongly the idea that it was Dravidian -- he is a dravidianist himself 3. I think he has made a real contribution to understanding the Harappan script in defining
@JoraShankara @Sapratha the fields P,M,C, T and their sub-structure. 4. I also think he may have found something meaningful in his analysis of the so-called "M" field.
I find his readings more "believable" than another recent IA interpretation which was posted by a person called yaj~nadeva. However,
@JoraShankara @Sapratha that doesn't mean I believe them or am convinced by them. Could there be something to his findings? 1. If the Southern Arc theory of the Harvard lab has something to it & Harappans are related to the Southern Arc then there could be a remote similarity between the S.arc languages