Either the Tories have not thought through the implications of the post-brexit immigration rules... or they have thought them through all too well.
I have a nasty inkling of what they might be up to, but it takes a bit of explaining.
Let's start with "before brexit"...
1/
Article 45 TFEU is a fundamental right of workers which entails the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality as regards remuneration. Plain-speak: an employer could not underpay an immigrant from Italy, say, just on the basis that they were not from the UK.
2/
Prior to brexit the majority of migrant workers were from EEA countries and this rule protected them.
It was not legal for a UK employer to bring in "cheap foreign workers" to undercut UK staff, and as result immigration from the EU was heavily skewed toward the jobs...
3/
...that Brits weren't prepared to do at all; agricultural labourers, warehouse workers, hospitality and care.
Now let's look at the New Rules: they actually *enshrine* the principle of paying immigrants less than the locals.
And it gets worse...
4/
Which are these "shortage occupations"?
- Scientists
- Engineers
- Architects
- Managers
- Actuaries
- Veterinarians
- IT Business Analysts
In our brave new post-brexit Britain it is the "good jobs" that will be undercut by immigrant labour. The jobs that Brits want.
5/
And the immigration numbers are going through the roof!
Tories are making a song and dance of trying to send 200 boat people to Rwanda but meanwhile, away from this choreographed distraction, they are organising the wholesale displacement of the UK middle class.
6/
Q: Why would they do this?
A: Because they are acting for a tiny elite - a few thousand very wealthy people. They have already impoverished the working classes - broken Union power and destroyed whole industries - destroying the middle class is just a natural progression.
7/
Q: What will the British middle classes do in this Brexitty new world?
A: Work or starve. The writing is on the wall.
The irony - and tragedy - of all this is that many brexit voters did so to REDUCE immigration. They were conned into believing...
...that Europeans were "coming over here to take our jobs", when in fact they were doing the jobs that Brits wouldn't touch with a barge pole. And now they find the Tory Brexit party has tripled net migration, to fill the type of jobs that Brits DO want to do.
9/
To sum it all up:
Despite his diversionary, performative threats to a handful of boat people - and his loud, empty words about reducing immigration - Sunak, has started doing to the British what Hengist and Horsa did to the Britons.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here we have Electricity and Gas prices in Euro per 100kWh, in February 2023, throughout Europe.
Where it gets REALLY interesting is when you compare the ***ratio*** of Electricity price to Gas price: See next tweet.
1/
The UK has by far the highest ratio of Electricity price to Gas price.
This is a result of Tory Government policies: 1. Gas for electricity incurs a Carbon Tax, whereas gas for boilers does not. 2. The price of ALL electricity is set by the price of Gas-fired electricity.
2/
.... which, of course, includes the Carbon Tax!
3. The government loads "policy" costs - such as the warm homes discount for poorer households - disproportionately onto electricity bills; £140 uplift for electricity vs £34 for gas.
This graph from the report is for a heat pump on the rear wall of a house, and shows how noisy it may be before it exceeds official (MCS) guidelines.
The vertical axis is the Heat Pump noise rating and the horizontal is distance to the neighbours nearest window.
2/
Let's say the neighbour's window is 3.1m away: then the noisiest acceptable heat pump will be 51 dB(A) if there is no garden fence, 56dB(A) if there is a partial barrier and 61dB(A) if there is a solid wall.
So far, so good... but then the report goes a little awry...
His whole CV, from personal invlovement in triggering the 2008 crash, to Brexit support, to ballooning government fraud on his watch, then shutting down the investigation, says this man puts personal enrichment above the public good.
1/
Hardly a month goes by without an "inadvertant" conflict of interest being uncovered.
Now he wants to protect big oil's income streams even though the OBR says failing to implement zero will be more than double the cost of implementing it.
So, Fishy Sunak, what first attracted you to the Billionaire fossil fuel sector?
It is time to ask the question: "Is Fishy a crook?" Have we given Billy Bunter the tuck shop keys? Has the UK turned into Russia where a tiny elite just loots at will?
Dot 1.
GB News is owned by All Perspectives Ltd, which is controlled by three significant shareholders, all of whom work for Christopher Chandler's Dubai-based investment firm Legatum.