Martin Indyk Profile picture
Nov 29 8 tweets 1 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
As negotiations on extending the Israel-Hamas pause begin in Doha, some preliminary observations:
1. Hamas remains in control in Gaza capable of enforcing the ceasefire on all the other terrorist groups, including PIJ.
2. That casts doubt on its claims that it can’t get its hands on all the hostages.
3. PIJ’s submission to Hamas’s command is an indication that Iran supports the ceasefire. Note that all of Iran’s proxies, including Hezbollah, have ceased firing despite…
…not being included in the agreement. (The Houthis were late in getting the memo.) This fits with Nasrallah’s advice to Hamas at the outset of the war to go for a ceasefire.
4. Hamas gains by holding the IDF at bay but also from the release of Palestinian prisoners to the West Bank where its popularity is soaring at Abu Mazen’s expense.
5. If this is all true then Hamas will be more than willing to pay with more hostages to hold off Israel’s resumption of hostilities.
6. Netanyahu can see that Hamas prefers not to return to war
but the public insistence on prioritizing return of hostages ties his hands. And pressure from Biden to extend the pause makes it doubly difficult for him to resume the battle.
7. How far both sides will be prepared to go in trading hostages and prisoners for the pause is about to be tested but the pressures and incentives for both to stick with it are at the moment stronger than the incentives to go back to war.
8. The time could be ripe for a larger swap deal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Indyk

Martin Indyk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Martin_Indyk

Nov 21
🧵While the hostage families wait anxiously, Bibi resorts to his standard playbook:
1. Drag out the cabinet deliberations to show how difficult it is to get his ministers to agree even though he already has a majority…
2. In the meantime leak from the Cabinet room that the Red Cross will have access to the remaining hostages so he can claim an additional achievement (which it is).

3. Claim that he hung tough to get a better deal at a lower price.
4. Give Biden credit for getting the better deal so the administration can't complain about the wringer he has put them through on every little detail.

5. Minimize the concessions he made by emphasizing that the war will go on even as he implements the ceasefire.
Read 4 tweets
May 26, 2022
You are right about the historical reference for Kissinger’s remarks being the 1973 Yom Kippur War @DrRadchenko. And your recounting of what happened there is astute. However, as I detail in Master of the Game, Kissinger tried a ceasefire based on a return to the status quo ante
in the early days of the war and failed. Then, after Nixon ordered a massive resupply of arms to Israel (a close analog to the US supply of arms to Ukraine) that helped Israel launch successful counter-offensives (sound familiar?), Kissinger offered the Arabs a new ceasefire
proposal. This one was based on UNSC resolution 242 of 1967 which recognized the inadmissability of the acquisition of territory by force and called for Israeli withdrawal from Arab territories (not “the” territories) Israel had occupied in 1967.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 12, 2020
Have now had a chance to watch part 3 of Bandar's harsh censure of the Palestinian leadership. From my own experience I can attest to the accuracy of his account of Arafat's failure to accept the Clinton Parameters in December 2000. Note Bandar confirms that: 1. Barak accepted...
...the Clinton Parameters. 2. Arafat lied when he told the Saudi and Egyptian ambassadors that he had accepted them. 3. Rather than pressing Arafat to accept, Bandar ran away. Years later King Abdullah told President Clinton that it was his greatest regret that he did not press..
Arafat to accept the Clinton Parameters. I heard directly from Mubarak's Egyptian advisers that he too regretted not pressing Arafat to accept. This is the other side of Bandar's story. Arab leaders are prepared to support the Palestinian cause but they will not...
Read 5 tweets
Aug 13, 2020
Three cheers for @MohamedBinZayed and his ambo in Washington Yousef al-Otaiba for a courageous and creative move to normalize relations with Israel, take its annexation of Palestinian land off the table and strike a blow to Israel’s right wing annexationist bloc.
@netanyahu may claim he’s still committed to annexation but in practice he has no way to do it now without sacrificing Israel’s relations with the UAE. Trump too cannot legitimize annexation after brokering this deal.
Palestinians feel betrayed but should have read the writing that’s been on the wall for a long time. Arab states will not pressure them to make a deal but they will not hold up their bilateral relations with Israel for Palestinians’ sake. Expect Oman and Bahrain to follow.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 13, 2019
My take on the Gaza-Israel crisis:
1. Abu al-Ata (the PIJ leader killed by Israel) earned his fate honestly. He was a rogue actor encouraged by Iran to launch rocket attacks on Israel to make it difficult for Hamas to consolidate its truce with Israel.
2. Israel is trying to keep Hamas out of the fight by restricting its retaliatory attacks to PIJ targets only and keeping casualties low. (That is the opposite of its usual strategy of attacking Hamas targets to press it to take responsibility for PIJ actions.)
3. So far Hamas has stayed out of the fray. But it is under pressure, especially from Iran. This strategy can only work if PIJ rockets continue to do little damage, Israeli retaliation causes limited casualties, and Hamas is able to resist the pressure to join in. Any one...
Read 4 tweets
Dec 28, 2018
For those asking why the US gives Israel $3.8 bn a year in military assistance:
1. Israel is a democratic ally that lives in a very dangerous neighborhood.
2. The US has a longstanding commitment to maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge. /..2
3. By doing so, US enables Israel to defend itself by itself.
4. US benefits from having a strong, reliable ally in a volatile and unstable region.
5. US also benefits from strategic partnership on intelligence and high-tech.
6. In an earlier era, US military assistance also helped Israel take real risks for peace. Hopefully, it will do so in the future.
7. Current levels of military assistance were agreed to by President Obama - a reflection of a longstanding bipartisan consensus.
8. At a time of...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(