Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
Nov 29, 2023 12 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Paris climate policy will cost a sizable fraction of 21st century prosperity

Two new, explosive, peer-reviewed papers show net-zero/1.5°C :

Benefit $4.5 trillion/year

Cost $26.8 trillion/year

Total loss is $1,800 trillion over the century

We must do better

🧵 + refs Image
New special issue of peer-reviewed journal 𝘊𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘌𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘴

First climate economic article shows cost and benefit of 1.5°C target

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
Climate benefit of 1.5°C policy is less than 0.5% of global GDP by mid-century and 3.1% by 2100

This is an overestimate, as it assumes change from absurdly high damage (RCP8.5) to 1.5°C

Based on new meta-analysis, 39 papers w/61 published estimates

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
Climate benefit of 1.5°C non-trivial

Economic costs are larger every year of this century

+ Cost wildly too small as paper assumes perfect climate policy with global, single, increasing carbon tax

In real life 2x higher or more

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
Second climate economic article shows more realistic costs of 1.5°C and its close cousin Net-Zero by 2050

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
Paris climate policy benefit low

Theoretical cost higher

Realistic cost of 1.5°C much higher again

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
Paris climate policy benefit low

Theoretical cost higher

Realistic cost of 1.5°C much higher again

Realistic cost of Net-zero by 2050 even higher

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
MIT paper only shows consumption costs, but authors shared GDP losses

They also shared their GDP development over century in 2007 US$ (roughly like UN SSP2)

Adj to 2023 US$ using BEA Table 1.1.9

worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
All figures are undiscounted

Since costs come before benefits, any discounting makes the benefit-cost ratio over the century even worse

Without discounting, each dollar delivers less than 17¢ of climate benefits

With 5% discounting it is less than a dime Image
We need to do better:

Green R&D is the way to dramatically cut the cost of going green

If we can innovate green energy to be cheaper than fossil fuels 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩

e.g.


cambridge.org/core/books/sma…
bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/1…
Paris climate policy will cost $27 trillion each year throughout the 21st century

Each dollar delivers just 17¢ of benefits

Our politicians need to do better


worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2…
Image
promises are far more wasteful than useful

I wrote a WSJ oped, detailing the new peer-reviewed studies that show
Paris climate promises could cost $27 trillion each year this century


wsj.com/articles/net-z…
archive.vn/DueaA
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bjorn Lomborg

Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BjornLomborg

Jul 3
Less Global Fire

Halfway through 2026, the world has burned at record-low levels

Every continent is below average, and Africa, Americas, and Europe are at record lows

Media only shows when stuff is burning, leaving us badly informed on climate change

gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…Image
Less Global Fire

Halfway through 2026, the world has burned at record-low levels for more than three months

Every continent is below average, and Africa, Americas, and Europe are at record lows

Media only showing stuff burning leaves us badly informed

gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…Image
2026 Fire in Europe at record lows

Halfway through 2026, Europe has burned less than in any year 2012-25

Every continent is below average, and Africa and the Americas are at record lows

Media only showing stuff burning leaves us badly informed

gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 25
Every year, Europe lets 10,000s of its citizens die from heat because of its ideological rejection of the century-old technology of air conditioning

With US-level air conditioning, Europe could prevent about 26,000 deaths in a year like 2022

rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/europes-dead…Image
EU: Lowest use of air conditioning

Highest rate of heat deaths

With US-level AC, it could save about 26,000 lives a year

Europe is rich and has, by latitude, fewer hot days than most inhabited regions

Its aversion to air conditioning is entirely because of an energy-degrowth ideology

rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/europes-dead…Image
@RogerPielkeJr Although we may think that everyone would have AC in the warmest countries, they don't

Even in hot Greece, one-third of homes don't have air conditioning Image
Read 4 tweets
May 12
Dementia risk down by two-thirds over past 40 years

In 1984, nearly 1 in 3 people in their late 80s had dementia

By 2024, it’s down to just 1 in 10

Data for US, but similar in Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK, and France

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…, free: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…Image
Dementia risk down by two-thirds over past 40 years

Possible explanations, smoking⬇️ and education⬆️, along with better nutrition and better management of hypertension, cholesterol, and depression

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…, free: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…Image
Dementia risk down by two-thirds over past 40 years

— with no slowdown at the end of the 40-year period

So when you hear that the future will bring a tsunami of dementia because there will be many more old people, it ignores that each person will likely be less at-risk

(A bit like the 1970s worried about a tsunami of cancer, but age-adjusted death risks are down)

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…, free: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…Image
Read 4 tweets
May 2
Textbook climate deception:

Lancet report blames climate for tens of thousands of European heat deaths

But hides that increase almost entirely due to an aging population

And ignores cold deaths, which are down much, much more

Refs and documentation in 🧵Image
Textbook climate deception:

Lancet report blames climate for tens of thousands of European heat deaths

But the increase is almost entirely due to an aging population

thelancet.com/journals/lanpu… ihmeuw.org/7jat, population.un.org/wppImage
Textbook climate deception:

Lancet report blames climate for 39,000 European heat deaths

But increase almost entirely due to an aging population

Real scientists show you the age-adjusted risk

(unlike scare-mongering campaigners)

thelancet.com/journals/lanpu…, ihmeuw.org/7jagImage
Read 7 tweets
Oct 30, 2025
Climate professor Michael Mann claims “There is no greater threat to developing nations than the climate crisis”

His claim is wrong in many ways

1) Intuitively wrong. Poor parents across the world worry about hunger, poverty, disease, insecurity, bad education. When your kid could die tonight from an easily curable disease, your priority is not a 0.1°C temperature reduction in a century

Mann quote: edition.cnn.com/2025/10/28/bus…Image
WRONG: Climate professor Michael Mann claims “There is no greater threat to developing nations than the climate crisis”

2) Leaders in low- and middle-income countries find education, employment, peace, and health are at the top of their development priorities, with climate at 12th of 16 issues

docs.aiddata.org/ad4/pdfs/Liste…Image
WRONG: Climate professor Michael Mann claims “There is no greater threat to developing nations than the climate crisis”

3) World Bank’s own surveys show that climate is not high on most countries’ agenda

On average, less than 6% of countries have climate in their top 3 priorities
Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 2, 2025
The world is burning less, not more

That's contrary to the climate narrative

2025 has seen dramatically less fire in Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe

On this trajectory, 2025 could become the lowest-burn year in the 21st century

Did you see this reported anywhere?

Data: from satellites circling the planet 24/7 (MODIS), modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/…

2025 data from Jan 1-Sept 2 shows 80% as much burned area as normally for same period 2012-24 from Global Wildfire Information System, gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…

Light blue data shows extrapolation on current trajectory to full 2025Image
In 2025, the world is burning less, not more

That's contrary to the climate narrative

2025 has seen extraordinarily little fire in Africa, much less than average, and even less than the minimum, from 2012-24

Did you see this reported anywhere?

Data from Global Wildfire Information System gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…Image
In 2025, the world is burning less, not more

That's contrary to the climate narrative

2025 has seen extraordinarily little fire in the Americas, much less than average, and even less than the minimum, from 2012-24

Did you see this reported anywhere?

Data from Global Wildfire Information System gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(