More: “And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group."
Commentary: "Despite all of the FBI's activities, a Reuters report from August 2021 refutes that there was any 'centrally coordinated' plot to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
Indeed, that was the entire point of the election challenges during the convening of the Electoral College.
If Donald Trump wanted to overturn the 2020 election results, he would not have disrupted the Electoral College. He would have continued to pursue his legal challenges and the political challenge in Congress.
Trump would not have sent in unarmed extremists to disrupt the Electoral College in order to retain power.
This is not only illogical, it is absurd on its face.
Nonetheless, this ridiculous partisan narrative has constituted the basis for prosecuting a former president in what has devolved into a partisan show trial and tantamount to election interference. It is not only ironic, but a disgrace to our entire justice system."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New House Speaker Releases ALL J6 Footage — And Videos Have Already Surfaced Showing Why They Were Suppressed thepoliticsbrief.com/new-house-spea…
"It became readily apparent why the January 6 committee under Speaker Nancy Pelosi's tenure had refused to release the footage.
Many videos have already surfaced that run contrary to the narrative that all of the Trump supporters who entered the capitol posed an existential threat to the country and were trying to "overturn the election."
Previously unreleased footage shows the calm manner that many protesters displayed.
There were more examples of peaceful protesters near Capitol Police officers.
Perhaps most controversially of all, a protester was uncuffed and then fist bumps a Capitol Police officer in a hallway.
This just doesn't feel 'right.'
Of course, it goes without saying that there were violent rioters on January 6. The issue is that the rioters gave advance warning they were coming; there were agents provocateurs like Ray Epps and John Earle Sullivan; the FBI had monitored extremist groups for months ahead of January 6, even violating constitutional rights in the process; none of the protesters brandished a firearm in the Capitol building; there were no means to seize and to hold power in the face of the strongest military in the world, and then Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump would know that; a Time article on the shadowy cabal that "fortified" the election stated the there was already a narrative set in March 2020 that Trump would "incite" a riot if he lost the election; and despite warnings from intelligence and law enforcement, time and time again, requests for more National Guard, even from Donald Trump himself, fell on deaf ears.
Then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Then-Senate Majority Leader McConnell did nothing to secure the Electoral College, where they knew there would be objections to the states' slates of electors. This process is what Donald Trump was actually advocating for and that is why he urged his actual supporters to "peacefully and patriotically" make their voices heard; meanwhile, there had already been suspect incursions at the capitol before his supporters could even make it from his speech to the Capitol building. It never added up. And that is why the videos had been suppressed."
Thought: Isn't it "funny" that two known agents provocateurs used the exact phrase "storm the capitol" prior to the January 6 "insurrection"?
"The media has gone beyond refusing to ask critical questions about Sullivan, due to his irrefutable associations with the radical left.
This would be very problematic for the Official Narrative™ that thousands of 'domestic terrorist' Trump supporters had gathered to pull off a supposed 'coup.'
Sullivan’s verified social media accounts for Insurgence USA, as well as Jaydenx, posted messages that strongly suggest that he wanted to participate in the capitol riots as early as December 28th. Sullivan even used hashtag #Antifa.
Sullivan invoked the highly suggestive phrase 'storm the capitol' to advertise the January 6 riots to extremists.
The flyer said, 'Operation Occupy the Capitol.' He added, 'Utah’s Terriotest group plans to storm the capitol Jan 6th!'"
BakedAlaska told investigative journalist Lara Logan that this was the exact phrase that Ray Epps said to him on the night prior to Jan. 6: ‘Storm the Capitol.”
Here are the EIGHT REPUBLICANS who voted against Biden's impeachment, as well as the ELEVEN REPUBLICANS who couldn't bother to vote.
You will be surprised at some of these names.
But it is very important you identify them and challenge them about putting their stamp of approval on the Biden Border Crisis with their decision not to impeach failed DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
FIrst off, @RepKenBuck. His office phone: (202) 225-4676. Let him know how you feel!
Next up: @RepDarrellIssa. His phone number is: (202) 225-5672. Give him a ring!
@repdarrellissa Then we have @tommcclintock. His office phone is: (202) 225-2511. Bet he loves to hear from his constituents!
Everywhere a radical leftist abuses power to rig the game to advance their destructive agenda.
These shameless activists use corruption, cronyism, and cancel culture to promote their deranged causes and to punish anyone who gets in their way.
We need to use cancel culture better than them.
They are not for fairness. They are not for equality. They are for rigging our institutions to acquire power over us.
If these ruthless activists are against your God-given rights, if they are against your freedom and that of your children, if they are for weaponizing the government against those who disagree with them, if they are for looting taxpayers to fund their cronies, and if they are indoctrinating children into their Woke cult, then they are your POLITICAL ENEMIES.
The radical left quietly declared war on America decades ago. But the American public hasn't been paying attention. ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION YET?
The time for sugarcoating it is over. If we were arguing in a free society with a fair set of rules, then that would be a different story. We do not live in a free country right now. We are running out of time and soft-peddling the dire situation will not help matters.
I know what an unfree society looks like. I lived in Russia where I worked as a journalist.
Moscow in the 2000s was less oppressive for your average citizen than being an American who speaks out against the Biden regime.
We now have enemies lists. Political prisoners. State-sanctioned censorship. Show trials. And weaponized government.
The totalitarian complex is advancing fast. We can no longer afford to shut our eyes to it.
"We can actually trace the money. We can connect the dots... that’s called money laundering, and this was a very organized criminal enterprise by the Biden family."
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”