Kyle Becker Profile picture
Independent journalist. Previous: Writer/Assoc. Producer for #1 Fox News primetime show. Director of Viral Media & Sr. Mg. Ed. for Top 5 News & Politics website
Deplorable Skymom Profile picture NJ Bill 🇺🇸 Profile picture Hockey Mom Profile picture Torn Dollar Bill Profile picture R K Profile picture 113 subscribed
Apr 18 4 tweets 4 min read
National Guard Captain Blows Up J6 Narrative, Accuses U.S. Govt of Lying to the American People

"I'm here today to aid the subcommittee in resolving factual errors in the official record of what happened on January 6th, 2021, specifically regarding the alleged District of Columbia National Guard delayed response caused by a critical presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed Pentagon senior officials," Captain Timothy Nick testified under oath on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. [...]

"First, I want to explain my role on January 6th. I was assigned as aid to camp the personal assistant to Major General William Walker, the commanding General of DC National Guard. It was my only second day on the job (!). Please focus on alleged facts found in the November 16th, 2021 Department of Defense Inspector General's multidisciplinary review into the DC National Guard response and Department of Defense's role that day."

"I can say unequivocally that the Inspector General's Review is riddled with inaccuracies, misstatements, and perhaps false flags and narratives regarding how critical Pentagon senior officials responded when our republic was under great stress (!!)."

"For instance, during a conference call at 2:31 PM with members of United States Army, US Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department, District of Columbia Government, and US Secret Service Uniform Division, the US Army's Lieutenant General Walter Piatt, Director of Army staff and the Army's Lieutenant General Charles Flynn, Director of Chief of Staff of Operations were on the call." Also was Colonel John Lubas, executive officer to the Secretary of the Army."

"The Army FALSELEY DENIED that General Flynn was ever on the call. This is false and material on its face. Lieutenant Flynn was on the call and even participated in discussions. The defense inspector's review also rounds language papering over the fact that Lieutenant General Piatt, Lieutenant General Flynn, while on the call discussed how they did not like the OPTICS."

"That is a direct quote, and they stated it would be in their best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy, to deny the request from Command General William Walker to deploy the DC National Guard and aid US Capitol Police in restoring restoration of Order Liberty on Capitol Hill."

"In addition, former [Army] Secretary Ryan McCarthy claims he was on a two three 1:00 PM call and spoke on that call. This is FALSE, unless he was in the room shadowing the call and he did not speak nor identify himself."

"He was not on the call. He was en route to Washington, DC Regional office at the Federal Bureau of Investigation to support that agent's concept of operations plan for January 6th."

"He went on the claim that he called and spoke to Major General Walker at least twice, ordering the deployment of the DC National Guard. This is also FALSE. At no time did General Walker take any calls, nor did we ever hear from the secretary on any of the ongoing conference calls or the secure video teleconferencing throughout the day."

"This I know because I was with the Command General the entire time recording events throughout the day. Major General Walker told by staff officers to stand by with respect to deploying to the Capitol Hill. Only at 5:09 PM in the early evening, which I wrote down in my wheel book, was the DC Guard given an order to deploy and move to the Capitol to assist Capitol Police."

"We arrived too late. One American laid dead with other sisters and brothers injured, including federal and local law enforcement officers. We were ready and standing by. I know if we were able to deploy immediately, when General Walker made the request, the National Guard could have helped and civil disturbance and restored public order quickly."

"The Army National Guard motto was always ready, always there. The DC National Guard was ready to help and assist Capitol Police, but we were NOT ALLOWED to do our job due to paralyzed decision-making by acting Secretary of Defense,Chris Miller and Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy..."

"This led to a crisis in federal leadership at the Pentagon and delayed the DC response by 3 hours and 19 minutes."

This is critical testimony exposing the U.S. government as perpetrating a false narrative of events for January 6 to frame Donald Trump as participating in a treasonous "insurrection" when the opposite was true.

The President of the United States had pre-authorized the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops and delegated this responsibility to the Secretary of the Army.

But instead of deploying National Guard troops to secure the capitol during the election challenges in the Electoral College, the Pentagon delayed dispatching troops over an alleged concern for "optics," even as the same government would later call January 6 'an existential threat to democracy.'

The U.S. government allowed the January 6 riots to happen in order to frame Donald Trump and his supporters as 'insurrectionists.' It is simple as that. See also:
mediaite.com/news/generals-…
Mar 27 6 tweets 2 min read
Black Entertainers tried to warn us about the destruction Hollywood is doing to America.

Ice Cube tried to warn us.

Katt Williams tried to warn us.

Dave Chappelle tried to warn us.

Kanye tried to warn us.

Maybe it's time to start listening. [🧵] Katt Williams tried to warn us.
Mar 20 4 tweets 6 min read
Did you know: The Ashley Biden Diary is real?

Here's why.

Two defendants in Florida pleaded guilty in 2022 to trying to sell the *stolen property* of President Biden's daughter Ashley.

"Aimee Harris and Robert Kurlander pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Damian Williams’ office said," the AP reported.

“Harris and Kurlander sought to profit from their theft of another person’s personal property, and they now stand convicted of a federal felony as a result,” Williams said in a statement.

This is further substantiation of the fact that Ashley Biden's diary is real — and the legal documents provide evidence that it indeed fell into the hands of Project Veritas.

"While authorities didn’t identify Ashley Biden or the organization that paid, the details of the investigation have been laid out in court filings and public statements from Project Veritas," the AP said.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation in November 2022 raided Project Veritas, the undercover reporting agency once led by James O’Keefe that displayed a knack for exposing corruption.

The FBI carried out search warrants at two locations – one in New York City and one in suburban Westchester County – to track down and obtain the stolen diary of Ashley Biden from Project Veritas’s associates. James O’Keefe’s home was also raided.

All over a "stolen diary." Doesn't that seem like excessive police action to hide a girl's coming-of-age story? Yes, it does, unless you consider potentially disastrous implications for powerful government officials.

Project Veritas provided background on how the diary was allegedly procured from her residence and then sold to the undercover journalists, as summarized by the AP:

Ashley Biden was moving out of a friend’s Delray Beach, Florida, home in spring 2020 when she stored the diary, tax records, a digital device with family photos, a cellphone and other items there, prosecutors said in a court filing.They said Harris then moved into the same room, stole the items and got in touch with Kurlander, who contacted Project Veritas, which asked for photos of the material and then paid for the two to bring it to New York.

The New York Times' coverage of the FBI raid recounts the controversy about the diary.

The Justice Department searched two locations associated with the conservative group Project Veritas as part of an investigation into how a diary stolen from President Biden’s daughter, Ashley, came to be publicly disclosed a week and a half before the 2020 presidential election, according to people briefed on the matter.

The reports about what is allegedly in the diary were disclosed originally by the National File's Patrick Howley and cast a disturbing picture about the life of Joe Biden's daughter growing up.

"According to our source, the diary also details Ashley Biden’s unhealthy relationship with sex, and the 'probably not appropriate' showers she shared as a young girl with her father, Joe Biden," the National File reported.

"After declaring she was 'here for sexual trauma' in the previous entry, on page 23 of the diary, dated January 30, 2019, the author explores the topic of sexual abuse and how it may have led to her overactive sex drive," the report noted.

“I’ve had one of my hardest days – my sex drive is out of f**king control. Like literally, I am in heat,” the author wrote.

“I know it’s not the healthiest way to deal with things but @ least it’s better than drugs,” she added in a 1/30/19 entry, along with confessing she needed “sex to feel good.”

She then stated her belief that she was "molested."

“Was I molested. I think so – I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma,” wrote the author. There appears to be a potential allusion to Ashley Biden’s cousin Caroline Biden, which the author says she remembers “being somewhat sexualized” along with “Caroline.”

Here, the author says that she was, "Hyper-sexualized [at] a young age," which preceded her stated belief that she had been "molested," albeit without recalling specifics. However, she goes on to also state her reaction to 'overhearing her parents having sex," as well.

In at least two entries, the National File noted, the author identifies herself specifically as "Ashley Blazer Biden."

The FBI's unusual raid on Project Veritas appears to be motivated by the aim to bury evidence.

The critical thing about the FBI seizing the diary allegedly belonging to Ashley Biden is that the accounts of victimization fit a "fact pattern" of behavior that has been attributed to Joe Biden.

There are numerous cases of Biden groping and fondling young boys and girls on video. One notorious example was an incident at a Senate swearing-in ceremony in 2015.

This was the same ceremony where he fondled a girl on camera, who later accused him of pinching her nipples. Maria Piacesi was eight when she was with her Uncle Senator Steve Daines and met Biden. In the video, she is clearly groped.

“Did Joe Biden pinch you?” A user by the name of Jonathan Pasetti asked, to which Piacesi responded, “Yes.”

However, she later deleted her comment.

“Why did you delete the comment?” Pasetti asked.

“I have friends that would no longer be friends with me if they knew that,” Maria Piacesi replied.

This reeks of a Biden pedophilia cover-up.

The question is thus raised whether Ashley Biden's diary (the one seized by the FBI, authenticated in full and without redaction) contains material evidence substantiating that Joe Biden had molested children.

There does not appear to have been a civil lawsuit ever brought in court over the reported contents of Ashley Biden's diary, which would lead to the tricky legal issue of "discovery." The contents of the diary would have to be authenticated (or deemed fraudulent) in court in order to decide if reports were libelous or defamatory.

It is extremely disturbing that the U.S. president may have engaged in acts of pedophilia — numerous authentic clips of Joe Biden online substantiate a pattern of his sexually suggestive behavior towards children — but America's premier "law enforcement" agency refuses to investigate or provide transparency on these claims.

The public's denial of evidence suggesting the President of the United States may have committed sex acts with a minor without demanding an actual, independent, and official investigation, is one more reason America is in deep, deep trouble.Image
Image
Image
Image
And while the state-controlled media doesn't care if the President of the United States is an accused pedophile, I do. Let's see this case brought to court and get it on the record if the reported contents are real or fraudulent. I would actually be relieved if Joe Biden were exonerated, but only after a fair trial that actually examines the evidence.
Mar 19 5 tweets 2 min read
BOMBSHELL.🚨

"I have evidence in my file of Serbian foreign nationals entering our election system..."

'Checkmate': Michigan Sheriff Reveals Sensitive Dominion Emails That Show Serbian Nationals Engaged in Foreign Election Interference
thekylebecker.com/p/michigan-she… Michigan @SheriffLeaf sent a letter to @JudiciaryGOP regarding his filings.

Nearly 2,000 pages of Dominion emails were recently filed in conjunction with a Michigan lawsuit.

Dominion email highlights:

- U.S. based DVS officials showed concern about potential hacking of Serbian contractor's account

- California SOS officials were copied on a voting project that it strongly appears that Serbian nationals were working on

- There are concerns that Serbian nationals had access to U.S. voter information, in California, e.g.

An attorney connected to the case, Stefanie Lambert, was suddenly arrested on Monday night.
Mar 19 8 tweets 4 min read
ELECTION INTEGRITY.🚨

"Nevena, we are seeing logins from your account in Kosovo, can you confirm this is expected?"

Dominion Voting Systems officials in U.S. showed concerns about potential hacking of Serbian staffer account prior to 2020 election. Whoa. 🔻


Image
Image
Image
Image
"We have two different systems flagging logins from Kosovo, just need to ensure these are really Nevena. If not, I will disable the account."

— Jeremy Holck, VP IT & Security, Denver, Colorado. Image
Mar 15 9 tweets 7 min read
The Covid-19 pandemic was pre-planned. The mRNA vaccine timeline doesn't add up.

Dr. Ralph Baric had the RNA "blueprint" for the Wuhan virus.

The bat/pangolin wet market was a CIA cover story.

The U.S. government is the American people's enemy.

We're making this too hard. If the U.S. government had benign intentions during the Covid-19 pandemic:

1. It would have been honest about it being an "accident" by admitting the funding to WIV

2. It wouldn't have invented outlandish cover stories about bats, pangolins, and raccoon dogs

3. It wouldn't have supported anti-constitutional NPI measures that did nothing to stop spread/lower mortality

4. It wouldn't have lied by telling everyone to get the jab (regardless of risk and lack of long-term testing), while implying it magically 'protects the community'

5. It wouldn't have made children wear dehumanizing masks that experts knew from prior Asian pandemics did nothing nothing to stop viruses, but heightened fear response

6. It would have held China fully accountable for the virus cover-up, which may have cost millions of lives

7. It wouldn't have manipulated data, as Dr. Birx admitted occurred in interviews about the response

8. It wouldn't have conflated Covid-related mortality and Covid-caused mortality to overstate risk (80% of deaths were elderly; most deaths had serious comorbidities)

9. It would have explained why the Pentagon/NIH funded the risky gain-of-function research despite bans

10. It would have raised suspicions about signs of pre-planning, like certain pharmaceutical patents, Event 201, Wuhan Military Games, and PLA stockpiling pandemic supplies

11. It would have declared the Wuhan virus to be a biological weapons attack

12. It wouldn't have kept information secret from President Donald Trump at start of Covid pandemic
Feb 18 6 tweets 2 min read
"I lived under police protection for about 30 to 40 days. I had a seven-day-old daughter at the time…"

Harvard Economist Needed ‘Armed Guard’ After Publishing Study Finding No Racial Bias In Police Shootings
beckernews.com/harvard-econom… Study:
nber.org/papers/w22399
Feb 13 6 tweets 6 min read
The Most Haunting Part of Tucker's Interview with Russian President Putin

Russian president Vladimir Putin was an ex-KGB colonel who witnessed the formal collapse of the USSR.

In his interview with Tucker Carlson, he slyly denied that he knew the reason for the Soviet demise.

"I'm coming to a very important point of today's agenda...

After all, the collapse of the Soviet Union was effectively initiated by the Russian leadership. I do not understand what the Russian leadership was guided by at the time, but I suspect there were several reasons to think everything would be fine."

"I think that then Russian leadership believed that the fundamentals of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine were, in fact a common language. More than 90% of the population there spoke Russian family ties. Every third person there had some kind of family or friendship ties, common culture, common history. Finally, common faith coexistence with a single state for centuries and deeply interconnected economies."

"These were so fundamental. All these elements together make our good relationships inevitable."

"The second point is a very important one. I want you as an American citizen and your viewers to hear about this as well."

"The former Russian leadership assumed that the Soviet Union had ceased to exist, and therefore there were no longer any ideological dividing lines. Russia even agreed voluntarily and proactively to the collapse of the Soviet Union and believed that this would be understood by the so-called Civilized West as an invitation for cooperation and association."

"That is what Russia was expecting, both from the United States and the so-called Collective West as a whole."

It is critical to view this statement in the context of the speaker — an ex-KGB colonel who is a master of disinformation and "active measures" — as well as developments in the West in the immediate aftermath of the formal demise of the Soviet Union.

What if the collapse of the USSR was the ultimate ruse to hasten the suicide of the West?

This is not wild speculation. The goal of Russia's espionage can be inferred from its heavy reliance on "active measures" since World War II, as revealed by the Venona transcripts and the Mitrokhin archive.

In the nuclear age, when war between great powers meant Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), espionage and subversion became imperative.

Direct military force became the least desirable option and unconventional warfare became the most preferred means of accomplishing foreign policy goals.

"All warfare is based on deception," as the great Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu wrote.

The Russians became masters of the new warfare. It was a matter of national survival against a more technologically, industrially, and militarily advanced great power.

Either the world would be absorbed into a global corporatist machine or the West would become subverted to a collectivist New World Order.

Soviet defector Yuri Bezemenov provided valuable insights on the KGB's use of ideological subversion.

Bezmenov stated that the goals of ideological subversion — demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and 'normalization' — would lead to the subversion of a state.

He boasted that the demoralization stage had been accomplished by the late 1970s and was 'overfulfilled' beyond Comrade Andropov's 'wildest dreams' by the mid-1980s when he was speaking out.

But another Soviet dissident, one with an unusually high rate of success when predicting Soviet foreign policy actions in the 1980s, turned out to be just as prescient.

Anatoly Golitsyn, who wrote the "Perestroika Deception" and "New Lies for Old," essentially accuses the USSR of faking its own reforms and even its death to accomplish foreign policy aims.

An extended passage here will show how the American New Left's domestic goals and the Soviets' foreign policy fit hand-in-glove:

"Ambition to control the Western mind is a long standing objective of Soviet policy, embracing the ideas of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci, who argued that mastery of human consciousness should be a paramount political objective."

"As Richard Pipes has pointed out [in 'Survival is Not Enough']... 'such mastery is secured, in the first place, by control of the organs of information'. The objective is 'to control thought at the source - that is, in the mind that absorbs and processes the information - and the best way of accomplishing this is by shaping words and phrases in the desired manner'."

"Moreover control of the Western mind is to be achieved not only by means of the dishonest use of language, but also through operations to demoralise the West - through corrosive attacks on society's institutions, the active promotion of drug abuse, and the spread of agnosticism, nihilism, permissiveness and concerted attacks on the family in order to destabilise society."

"Religion and the traditional cultural and moral hegemony must first be destroyed, before the revolution can be successful... The still unproven assumption of the strategists is that with Western society 'deconstructed', its leaders will meekly accept and cooperate with the Soviet plan for a 'New World Social Order', or World Government." [...]

"The primary objective of 'perestroika', then, is to restructure the Western mind using both deceptive language and the ideas of Gramsci so that it becomes more receptive to, and more inclined to collaborate with, the implementation of Soviet global strategic objectives. [...]

"'The Perestroika Deception' reveals how the largely unseen Soviet collective leadership, borrowing the mind-control ideas of Gramsci, implemented their long-prepared shift from Lenin's 'dictatorship of the proletariat' to his 'state of the whole people', the primary characteristic of which is a theatrical display of 'democratism' designed to convince the West that a decisive 'Break with the Past' has taken place, in order to encourage Western Governments to abandon caution and to embark upon an open ended programme of collaboration with the 'former' Soviet Bloc. Implicit in such collaboration is the threat of a 'return to the Cold War' - or worse - if the West does not cooperate. The equation can be summed up as 'cooperation-blackmail'."

Thus, we can read Putin's disappointment in the West as a kind of frustration of Soviet objectives. Or, alternatively, we can read it as Putin playing coy with the West while we collectively commit suicide.

Since the former demise of the USSR, ex-premier Mikhail Gorbachev almost immediately took the lead in spearheading the Climate Change agenda.

The point-person for the Soviet "transition" in the 1990s would be none other than future global warming prophet Al Gore. Others, such as John Kerry, would seize on the issue to hasten to erect a global climate change regime.

The United States is thus looking outward for monsters to destroy instead of staring into the abyss of its own collapsed values.

The Western corporatist powers are thus attempting to assimilate the "periphery" of Ukraine (and other former Soviet republics) into a globalist "core."

Putin, who has infiltrated and understands the Western globalist mind exceptionally well, has pushed back militarily to secure geopolitical security in a pre-emptive 'fait accompli' designed to bolster its defenses, and provide pretext to form alliances, with the BRICS nations for the gathering storm. The Perestroika Deception (full):
archive.org/stream/Anatoli…
Feb 9 6 tweets 2 min read
The CIA basically runs CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC News at this point.

That is my only explanation for the disgusting way they have covered the Biden presidency ever since the 2020 election. Political bias doesn't cover it. The non-stop hoaxes. The lies of omission and commission. The coordinated talking points. The attacks on anyone who rejects the state narrative. This is not organic media behavior. It's to chase ad revenue and to earn the trust of an audience.
Feb 8 4 tweets 3 min read
This Special Counsel report on Joe Biden's classified documents scandal reveals wrongdoing far worse than anything pertaining to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago case.

While Joe Biden was a private citizen he stored classified documents pertaining to the Afghan War, foreign policy, and intelligence methods.

These were stored in Biden's Delaware garage and at the Penn Biden Center, not the home of a president who had Secret Service protection.

"The FBI recovered additional marked classified documents at the Penn Biden Center, elsewhere in Mr. Biden's Delaware home, and in collections of his Senate papers at the University of Delaware, but the evidence suggests that Mr. Biden did not willfully retain these documents and that they could plausibly have been brought to these locations by mistake." (!)

"We also investigated whether persons other than Mr. Biden knowingly mishandled these classified documents, and our investigation showed that they did not. In reaching these conclusions, we note the numerous previous instances in which marked classified documents have been discovered intermixed with the personal papers of former Executive Branch officials and members of Congress."Image
Image
Image
Image
What does "willfully" have to do with anything? This is the Hillary Clinton emails narrative all over again!
Jan 23 5 tweets 2 min read
The Never-Trump group "has received a significant amount of funding from Democrat-aligned or otherwise left-of-center organizations," an investigation found.

Nikki Haley Gets Boost From Never-Trump Group Fueled By Liberal Dark Money
thepoliticsbrief.com/nikki-haley-ge… Review of key players

• Defending Democracy Together (DDT): Co-founder Never-Trumper Bill Kristol

DDT funders
• Sixteen Thirty Fund: Nonprofit managed by Arabella Advisors
• Hopewell Fund: Also managed by Arabella Advisors
• Democracy Fund Voice: Founded and funded by eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar
• Reid Hoffman: Billionaire founder of LinkedIn
Jan 21 37 tweets 15 min read
🧵Explosive New Evidence Suggests J6 Pipe Bomb Threats Were Part of Plot to Disrupt 2020 Election Challenges

Is this the missing link in the J6 plot to set up former President Trump and his supporters?

According to released J6 surveillance footage, the Secret Service and DC Metro Police "casually completed their lunches" before responding to the discovery of a “viable” explosive device at the Democratic National Committee headquarters by a person previously characterized as a “passerby.”

Except that "passerby" was actually a plainclothes U.S. Capitol Police officer, as confirmed by Revolver News and BlazeMedia.

The FBI, Secret Service, U.S. Capitol Police, and D.C. Metro Police response to the alleged pipe bomb threat at the DNC on January 6 raises profound new questions about a ‘cover-up’ that has the potential to shake Americans’ view of their own government to its very core.

As seen in resurfaced video footage, originally released by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), the Secret Service and DC Metro Police were unusually lax in their response to the DNC pipe bomb threat.

Why is this important? Because the J6 pipe bomb threat is a critical aspect of the argument that the disruption of the 2020 election challenges was all planned. As Steve Baker of BlazeMedia reported, the pipe bomb was found at the DNC office by a United States Capitol Police plainclothes officer.
theblaze.com/columns/analys…
Jan 20 4 tweets 2 min read
Any government that would dress Feds up in "right wing' cosplay to push a left-wing narrative is an enemy of the people.

This is simultaneously stupid and extremely dangerous.
I don't care if there are only 3-10 FBI agents or assets in this group. It is aiding and abetting a narrative for political purposes. It should be HIGHLY ILLEGAL.

Congress needs to investigate and put an end to this, in addition to exposing the truth about the obvious J6 plot.
Jan 13 4 tweets 1 min read
BREAKING.🚨

"[T]he FBI will argue the Work Laptop and its contents are exempt from disclosure..."

FBI Goes ‘Rogue’ and Defies Court Order to Turn Over Seth Rich Documents
thepoliticsbrief.com/fbi-goes-rogue… "The FBI has responded to the court order by stating that it does not intend to comply with it.

In an interesting development, left-wing reporters finally admitted that none of this is adding up."
Jan 13 5 tweets 4 min read
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'

An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.

The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.

"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."

The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.

“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC.

“This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”

The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.

It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.

The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.

Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.

It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.

Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”Image
Image
Image
Image
You can read the links to the lawsuits and copious notes through the link below:
election-integrity.info/2020_Election_…
Jan 8 5 tweets 3 min read
BREAKING.🚨

Judge issues *whoops* in aftermath of releasing new Epstein images. Image Whoops, indeed.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Dec 20, 2023 5 tweets 1 min read
The United States government is now destroying America. It's unreal. Growing up in the 80s, I was proud to be an American. Now, the U.S. government is making it gross.

Freedom-loving states need to start considering nullifying the actions of this lawless government. They also need to start pushing for self-sufficiency and prepare for the dissolution of the union.

The actions of Washington D.C. have become unacceptable.
Dec 2, 2023 4 tweets 2 min read
My theory on why big corporations are so quick to blacklist a president like Donald Trump & mass boycott a free-speech advocate like @ElonMusk...

The federal government is blackmailing them.

This is full-blown fascism we're witnessing, folks. Let there be no doubt about it. @elonmusk It doesn't make any sense from a financial point-of-view for a big corporation to spite its audience, undermine the economy, and go against financial self-interest.

But there is an explanation for it... Image
Nov 18, 2023 4 tweets 2 min read
BREAKING NEWS.🚨🚨

New House Speaker Releases ALL J6 Footage — And Videos Have Already Surfaced Showing Why They Were Suppressed
thepoliticsbrief.com/new-house-spea… "It became readily apparent why the January 6 committee under Speaker Nancy Pelosi's tenure had refused to release the footage.

Many videos have already surfaced that run contrary to the narrative that all of the Trump supporters who entered the capitol posed an existential threat to the country and were trying to "overturn the election."

Previously unreleased footage shows the calm manner that many protesters displayed.

There were more examples of peaceful protesters near Capitol Police officers.

Perhaps most controversially of all, a protester was uncuffed and then fist bumps a Capitol Police officer in a hallway.

This just doesn't feel 'right.'

Of course, it goes without saying that there were violent rioters on January 6. The issue is that the rioters gave advance warning they were coming; there were agents provocateurs like Ray Epps and John Earle Sullivan; the FBI had monitored extremist groups for months ahead of January 6, even violating constitutional rights in the process; none of the protesters brandished a firearm in the Capitol building; there were no means to seize and to hold power in the face of the strongest military in the world, and then Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump would know that; a Time article on the shadowy cabal that "fortified" the election stated the there was already a narrative set in March 2020 that Trump would "incite" a riot if he lost the election; and despite warnings from intelligence and law enforcement, time and time again, requests for more National Guard, even from Donald Trump himself, fell on deaf ears.

Then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Then-Senate Majority Leader McConnell did nothing to secure the Electoral College, where they knew there would be objections to the states' slates of electors. This process is what Donald Trump was actually advocating for and that is why he urged his actual supporters to "peacefully and patriotically" make their voices heard; meanwhile, there had already been suspect incursions at the capitol before his supporters could even make it from his speech to the Capitol building. It never added up. And that is why the videos had been suppressed."
Nov 17, 2023 6 tweets 3 min read
BREAKING NEWS.🚨🚨

Antifa ‘Revolutionary’ Who Incited January 6 Riots Found Guilty on All Seven Counts
beckernews.com/55-antifa-revo… "The media has gone beyond refusing to ask critical questions about Sullivan, due to his irrefutable associations with the radical left.

This would be very problematic for the Official Narrative™ that thousands of 'domestic terrorist' Trump supporters had gathered to pull off a supposed 'coup.'

Sullivan’s verified social media accounts for Insurgence USA, as well as Jaydenx, posted messages that strongly suggest that he wanted to participate in the capitol riots as early as December 28th. Sullivan even used hashtag #Antifa.

Sullivan invoked the highly suggestive phrase 'storm the capitol' to advertise the January 6 riots to extremists.

The flyer said, 'Operation Occupy the Capitol.' He added, 'Utah’s Terriotest group plans to storm the capitol Jan 6th!'"
Image
Nov 14, 2023 21 tweets 7 min read
🧵THREAD:

Here are the EIGHT REPUBLICANS who voted against Biden's impeachment, as well as the ELEVEN REPUBLICANS who couldn't bother to vote.

You will be surprised at some of these names.

But it is very important you identify them and challenge them about putting their stamp of approval on the Biden Border Crisis with their decision not to impeach failed DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

FIrst off, @RepKenBuck. His office phone: (202) 225-4676. Let him know how you feel!
Image Next up: @RepDarrellIssa. His phone number is: (202) 225-5672. Give him a ring! Image