It's my view that the Soviet Union faked its own death and what we are experiencing is "global convergence" towards international socialism.

The Soviet Union could have crushed the Velvet Revolutions. Instead, it chose to suddenly become "benign" and let them happen? I don't think so.

The truth is that the KGB's foreign subversion of the West was complete.

The USSR became the CIS. The KGB reorganized, an illusion of "democracy" was erected, and Putin was made the supreme leader of Russia.

In place of "communism" there was a switch made to activist causes like the "climate crisis." Mikhail Gorbachev was an early leader in this globalist movement.

The United States' Al Gore, who became a "green prophet," was also a top liaison to Russia after the "fall" of the Soviet Union.

Meanwhile, the socialists' gameplan was to watch the West destroy itself and become more like the old Soviet Union.

Big picture: China and Russia made cosmetic reforms to "communism." The West is becoming more communist under the big lie of "defending democracy."

If you look at it this way, everything makes perfect sense. Note: "Communism" is being used here to describe an authoritarian collectivist system run by elites. It does not pertain to the propaganda forms used to brainwash pseudo-elites.

The Globalist Elite's Assault on the West

"It’s time to stop pretending this is normal. Because if they can do it to Le Pen, Bolsonaro, Georgescu, Trump, or Elon Musk—they can do it to anyone."

All across Western civilization, globalists are making one thing clear: Don’t stand in the way of our political agenda, or we will burn your country to the ground.

France Is Trying to Jail the Opposition—Literally

Marine Le Pen is leading in the polls for the 2027 French presidential election. That’s a big problem for the French establishment, so they’re doing what tyrants always do when the people don’t play along—they’re trying to jail the opposition.

Prosecutors say Le Pen misallocated EU assistant funds. Not stole, not pocketed—just used the money to pay party staff instead of bureaucratically approved assistants in Brussels.

No personal enrichment, no lavish lifestyle—just typical campaign operations. For that, they want to ban her from office and hit her with a five-year sentence.

Anyone who witnessed the corrupt 2024 election campaign can sense a familiar theme.

But here’s the real scandal: the French court could enforce the ban immediately, even while Le Pen appeals. That would take her off the ballot next week—despite leading every major poll.

They call it “provisional execution.” It's rarely used, usually reserved for violent criminals. Now they want to use it to kneecap a presidential frontrunner.

The Macron regime isn’t even hiding it. The man overseeing the court’s next move is Richard Ferrand—a longtime Macron ally with zero judicial background. This is the guy picked to oversee the Constitutional Council. He got the job thanks to political maneuvering, not legal expertise.

They’re not defending democracy. They’re defending Macron’s power and trying to crush the one woman who could end it. Kamala Harris Broke Campaign Laws, No One Cares

Now let’s talk about hypocrisy. In 2003, Kamala Harris broke campaign finance law in her San Francisco DA run—violated the city’s spending cap, misled voters, and got slapped with what was then the largest fine ever issued.

Did she get banned from office? Was she dragged through the courts for “undermining democracy”? Of course not.

In 2024, her presidential campaign burned over a billion dollars—handed cash to Oprah’s company, hired radical activist groups, paid influencers, flew private jets all over the country. Massive overspending, shady payments, ties to groups pushing anti-American ideas.

But Harris walks away clean. She even got floated for another White House run. Meanwhile, in France, they want to jail Le Pen over internal staff allocations from a decade ago. The double standard isn’t just obvious—it’s the whole point.

"The American people are truly going to be shocked at what they see."

Do you think we will get the whole truth about the JFK assassination?
My view: Unless this report has some damning revelations on the roles of the FBI and CIA in the JFK assassination plot, I will assume the real files were burned a long time ago.

BREAKING: Climate United 'Slush Fund' is Now Subject of 'Ongoing Criminal Investigation'
thekylebecker.com/p/china-connec… If you haven’t been following the Climate United Fund scandal, then buckle up, because it’s one hell of an electric vehicle ride on the corruption superhighway.

In a major update, it was reported today that the "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund" program was the subject of an “ongoing criminal investigation,” per @juliekelly2:

- The FBI recommended placing a 30-day administrative freeze on eight slush fund recipients in light of “credible information” of possible criminal violations.

- EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin called for the financial agreement with Citibank be terminated and the grant funds immediately returned.The EPA Inspector General has opened an investigation.

- Further, as Zeldin reported last night on X, he has terminated all agreements with the grant recipients--so-called climate "nonprofits" including one started by Stacey Abrams last year.

If you’re not up to speed, here are the basics on this developing scandal.

🧵The Shadow Government: New Evidence the Biden Presidency Was Almost Entirely Run by 'Autopen'

“I'm going to get in so much trouble for saying all this. But these are the people who ran our country for the last four years.”

The shadow government is being dragged into the light. The disturbing developments about where our money has been going are flooding in on a daily basis.

But less forthcoming is the answer to a question that has been on Americans’ minds about a four-year absence of leadership that looks absolutely vacuous in relief to the vigorous and unrelenting Trump presidency: Who actually ran the Biden presidency?

A tantalizing lead has surfaced, courtesy of a report by the Heritage Foundation’s @OversightPR.

"Whoever controlled the autopen controlled the presidency. We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency. All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year. Here is the autopen signature."

According to newly released evidence, nearly every document in the federal register bearing Joe Biden’s signature during his presidency was not signed by the man himself—but by an autopen.

The only known autopen exception? Biden’s letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race.
As you can see, the signature is not only different, but underlined.

You might recall that the letter itself was a bizarre hodgepodge of statements cobbled together into a “resignation letter” that did not fit the moment of a president who was about to lose his chance at re-election, as well as incur damage to his legacy.

So, did Joe Biden actually sign his resignation letter? Or was it signed for him? We may never know the truth. But it does raise the possibility that it is a forgery.

There could be serious legal ramifications if Joe Biden’s signature was “forged” by autopen to make presidential authorizations in name only.

We will unpack the legal ramifications of the development, including a consideration of whether such “executive decisions” are constitutional; delve into the historical background on the autopen and its use by U.S. presidents; and dig up extremely suggestive leads on who was actually running the Biden presidency in absentia via autopen.

My extended analysis of the signatures of “Joe Biden” at the federal register is that the claim that the Biden administration was largely run by “autopen” appears to hold up.

House Oversight Project finds the "Biden presidency" was almost entirely run by autopen signature.

"We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency," says @OversightPR.

"All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year. Here is the autopen signature."

This is criminal. The Biden "presidency" didn't have a real president. People should go to jail for this. @OversightPR Don't give me the "but Trump does it too!"

Here is what it looks like when Trump signs major pieces of legislation or executive orders. Get the difference?

America and the European Union are at a crossroads.

The European Union needs America. But America does not need the European Union.

But it's not just U.S. taxpayer support for NATO that the European Union needs to provide for its own security. It needs America's military presence and warfighting ability.

The great majority of Europeans are unwilling to fight in wars to defend their nations from foreign aggressors.

One reason is because the EU has imported millions of migrants who have no loyalty to the governments or interest in preserving national cultures.

If you compare non-EU European states with EU member states you'll find a shocking difference: 61% of the former are willing to fight in wars, as opposed to just 32% in the latter, according to 2024 Gallup polling.

Popular support for EU member states is crumbling. This is why the European Union needs an external enemy to focus on, such as Russia, to "rally around the flag."

But in the EU's case, it is the Ukraine flag. That cause is wearing thin.

While many believe Russia is a strong and united foe that threatens Europe, this is a false perception. Only 32% will say on the record that they will fight in wars, while 20% say they won't and 48% say 'they don't know.' (It should be noted that it is illegal in Russia to say that you won't fight in a war. This is one cause for discrepancies you might find on Reddit and elsewhere that shows higher support in Russia.)

The United States has been experiencing its own collapse in popular support, which the Trump administration is attempting to reverse. Support for fighting in wars has been dropping in the U.S. since the first Gulf War, but it fell even further under Biden. Gallup polling shows that only 41% of Americans would be open to fighting in wars.

This has led to a crisis in military morale and a drop in recruitment. It will be a major challenge for the Trump administration to restore America's willingness to fight.

The Trump administration has a chance to accomplish this task because it is rejecting the disastrous path that the European Union has taken.

By securing the border and limiting foreign migration, reforming the military so that it focuses on warfighting, respecting the constitutional rights of citizens, and seeking a foreign policy of "peace through strength," the Trump administration can return America to its rightful place as a strong and great nation.


Ed. Note: In addition to summarizing EU-US relations, this post attempts to clarify posts misrepresenting Russians' willingness to fight in wars. These "polls" tend to grossly overestimate support and tend to falsely lionize Russia.

Secondly, there are a number of articles, such as by CNN, that seek to downplay America's support for NATO. These stories attempt to reject President Trump's claims that the US pulls the weight for NATO by arguing the US only pays a small percentage of the defense budget — namely, 15.8%.

However, this is only counting DIRECT spending and it is not accounting for INDIRECT spending that supports NATO's mission. The U.S. has by far the largest military budget of any NATO member and has extensive military operations in Europe.

NEW: @ElonMusk really has George Soros figured out.

"George Soros is a systems hacker. He is a genius arbitrager. He figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a non-profit then lobby politicians to send a ton of money to that non profit so you can take what might be a $10M donation and leverage it into a $1B NGO."

"Then the government continues to fund it every year, and it will have a nice sounding name like 'The Institute for Peace,' but really it's a grafting machine."

BINGO. @elonmusk You can read more about Soros here:
thekylebecker.com/p/george-soros…

A State within A State: The Progressive Left's 'Shadow Government' Revealed

"The system of NGOs, charities, and trusts constitutes an unaccountable 'parallel government' designed to transform the US into a globalist fiefdom run by privileged elites."
thekylebecker.com/p/a-state-with… ‘A State within a State.’

That’s what Mikhail Gorbachev called the KGB, the Russian version of the “deep state,” after the August coup of 1991.

The former Soviet premier invoked the term with the triumphal declaration: “There will no longer be a state within a state.”

Such were the heady times of the early 1990s in Russia after the formal demise of the U.S.S.R.

But the people’s victory was short-lived. The KGB, led by the ‘Grey Cardinal’ Col. Vladimir Putin himself, was staffed with survivors who were bent on adapting and eventually conquering the fledgling Russian ‘democratic’ state.

In the 1970s, the United States had its own version of ‘perestroika’: The “Halloween Massacre.” That’s when the Carter administration conducted a mass purge of CIA personnel on October 31, 1977, led by Admiral Stansfield Turner, the new Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

The new administration pared down 20% of the U.S. human intelligence (HUMINT) assets in the Intelligence Community’s workforce. This included 649 jobs cut through attrition, 154 forced retirements, and 17 outright firings. The layoffs targeted seasoned covert officers—some with roots back to the CIA’s 1947 founding—earning the event its grim moniker from the press and outraged insiders.

Seem familiar?

The Trump administration came into office with a whirlwind. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), under the stewardship of tech billionaire Elon Musk, has shined a bright light on the “shadow government” that was running the United States during the ineffectual and disastrous Biden administration.

DOGE’s forced transparency has unleashed unparalleled caterwauling in the establishment press, which has only furthered suspicions of the deeply embedded shadow government that subsists on waste, fraud, and abuse in the U.S. government.

More provocative than the line items DOGE has singled out for elimination, such as funding Sesame Street in Iraq and transgender surgeries in India, is the astounding realization that the entire U.S. system of NGOs, charities, and trusts constitutes an unaccountable “parallel government” that is designed to engineer consensus and transform the United States into a globalist vassal state run by privileged elites.

@DataRepublican, who runs an outstanding website where citizen journalists can research the vast web of corruption between U.S. agencies and so-called Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), put it this way:

“I’ve said it again, I'll say it again. Taxpayer-funded NGOs function as a parallel government. Even worse, many sitting members of Congress are directly involved in them. They see themselves as the real government, prioritizing debates with other bureaucrats on the global stage over serving the people they represent. This is why critical issues like healthcare, education, and help for Helene victims are consistently neglected.”

This is a point I’ve made repeatedly as well: If you want to stop the transition of the United States into a post-constitutional oligarchy run by unelected elites and bureaucratic apparatchiks, stop the U.S. government’s funding and sheltering of billionaire trusts, fraudulent “charities,” and so-called Non-Governmental Organizations.

George Soros and the Trump 'Counter-Color Revolution'

"Donald Trump is now carrying out his own ‘counter-color revolution.’ It’s red, white, and blue."

Billionaire George Soros has maintained a long-standing, secretive alliance with the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including USAID—in a corrupt partnership to act as an “agent of chaos” to bring about regime change in nations around the world.

Soros infiltrated the foreign influence machinery crafted by the Reagan administration in the 1980s to further the goal of promoting “anti-communism” in Central and Eastern Europe, before co-opting that same machinery after the formal demise of the Soviet Union in order to propagate globalist objectives.

America was on the brink of succumbing to this whole-of-society plan to radically alter the nation into an unrecognizable, post-constitutional republic.

But, miraculously, Donald Trump’s unlikely election victory in 2024 marks a turning point in American history.

Due to Big Tech reforms at social media platforms like X, now under the ownership and stewardship of populist, free-speech advocate Elon Musk, we can start to build our own consensus on what went wrong and how we can dramatically course correct.

Let’s reflect on how the nation was brought to the edge of tyranny, as well as explore actionable ways to reform the institutions of America so that we can prevent the ultimate “colored revolution” of fundamentally transforming the United States.

But first, let us take a detailed look at the “Soros empire” — how this radical billionaire spread his sprawling network around the globe, and how Donald Trump is carrying out his own “counter-color revolution” to untangle this web and free the American people from its malign influence. The Origins of Soros’s Influence: A Fusion of Wall Street and State Department Interests

George Soros established the Open Society Foundations in 1979, initially as a financial maneuver benefiting his heirs. However, in the early 1980s, Soros aligned himself with the Reagan administration's newly formed National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and USAID to operate as a key conduit for U.S. intelligence efforts aimed at dismantling the Soviet Union.

This collaboration, first realized under the guise of promoting civil society, allowed Soros to leverage his financial acumen in currency speculation while ensuring alignment with U.S. strategic interests.

As @MikeBenzCyber explains:

"Soros was speculating on the currencies of countries in Central and Eastern Europe while he had partnerships with the State Department in advance knowledge of operations to overturn those countries’ governments. This was the ultimate version of insider trading."

This is a critical analytical link between Soros and his sprawling empire:

"[Soros] basically had the ultimate insider trading, which is that he knew what countries were going to be toppled and therefore what would happen to their currency and could speculate through his hedge fund activities way in advance of that.

And then beyond that, you also have the benefits of anti-communism from the stuff he was doing because all of these communist countries held collectively trillions of dollars, especially with Russia of publicly held assets. The moment you become a private economy, all of those assets go up in a fire sale to London and Wall Street stakeholders. That is not only did they get to do the Forex speculation, not only did they get the Chamber of Commerce proceeds, but then they also got to dumpster dive at bargain basement prices for all the formerly federally held, publicly held assets of the people who lived in those countries, so that George Soros and the Harvard Endowment and all these civil society people could leverage those financial arms to gobble up the assets."

That's why when George Soros says he built his empire in the shadow of the former Soviet Empire, that's where that empire comes from.

Or you can watch George Soros himself explain it.

“When the Soviet Empire collapsed… I moved in and picked up the pieces… So this is how the Soros Empire is replacing the Soviet Empire,” he said.

The end of the Cold War saw Soros emerge as one of the primary financiers of post-Soviet transitions, enabling Western financial interests—especially those tied to the hedge fund community—to acquire massive stakes in privatized industries of formerly communist nations. This alignment of incentives between Wall Street and Washington cemented Soros as a linchpin of global regime change operations.

Fun fact: A blind man was put in charge of the Project of Government Oversight.

This is who the Democrats called up to oppose the DOGE agenda.

The blind literally leading the blind. You can't make this stuff up.
"These facts, as well as already-emergent legal challenges, make it unlikely that DOGE will provide the check against waste, fraud, and abuse that its proponents hope for."

Here is Mr. Dylan Hedtler-Gaudett's testimony. He thinks the IGs that allowed nearly HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS a year in waste, fraud and abuse were doing a 'bang-up' job and shouldn't have been fired.
oversight.house.gov/wp-content/upl…

Let's put this to rest now. George Soros, Bill Gates, Ford Foundation, and USAID have funded an organization that backed radical district attorneys.

Soros' Open Society Foundations (OSF) has received millions of dollars in USAID funding over the years throughout its vast NGO network.

So has the radical clearinghouse Tides Center.

USAID gave nearly $15 million to George Soros' Open Society Foundations during Obama's last four years in office.

USAID awarded the Tides Center $24.6 million in September 2016 for the Civil Society Innovation Initiative.

Open Society Foundations gave $25.8 million to the Tides Center just in 2021.

The Tides Center, in turn, backed radical district attorneys, particularly, through the project Fair & Just Prosecution (FJP).

FJP is a fiscally sponsored project of the Tides Center, so exact dollar amounts for donor support are obscured.

It should be added that Soros is not the only billionaire to back FJP. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Ford Foundation are also major players in this space.

Soros directly donated millions to PACs that endorse radical DAs who turn a blind eye to criminal aliens and whose soft-on-crime policies endanger the public.

In Texas, for example, Soros gave millions to the Texas Majority PAC, Texas Justice & Public Safety PAC, and therefore, to smaller recipient PACs.

Texas Majority Pac gave to the First Tuesday PAC, for example, which in turn backed radical DAs in Harris County.

The bottom line: USAID dollars have been indirectly aiding and abetting the damage that radical billionaires like George Soros and Bill Gates are doing to the United States of America.

USAID's web of taxpayer funding for radical NGOs needs to end if Americans are to take a major step towards reclaiming their government.


H/T on the Tides Center screenshot: @MikeBenzCyber

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1880239992808603991

It's not just Politico. The Associated Press has been raking in millions of dollars in government money for years.

The AP's bias also makes perfect sense.


You can check it out here:
usaspending.gov/search/?hash=3…

Fun Fact: @Politico received USAID funds.

Everything makes sense now.

@politico On Tuesday, it was reported that, "Staff at Politico did not get paid for the latest pay period. The company just sent several emails to employees saying it believes there was a technical error, and is looking into how to fix the issue."

"Musk’s DOGE is exposing the unaccountable power USAID wielded, and the Democratic establishment is terrified."

Trump Shuts Down USAID: The Deep State Meltdown Begins
thekylebecker.com/p/trump-shuts-… President Donald Trump has ordered the immediate shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), citing massive corruption, waste, and its role as a covert arm of the Deep State.

Under the leadership of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), USAID’s headquarters were shuttered, employees were locked out of their systems, and funds frozen.

An email was sent to USAID personnel said that the move was taken by “Agency leadership”:

“At the direction of Agency leadership, the USAID headquarters at the Ronald Reagan building in Washington, D.C. will be closed to Agency personnel on Monday, February 3, 2025."

"Agency personnel normally assigned to work at USAID headquarters will work remotely tomorrow, with the exception of personnel with essential on-site and building maintenance functions individually contacted by senior leadership."

The email added that replies should be directed to Gavin Kliger, a special adviser to the director of the Office of Personnel Management and who works for DOGE.

Donald Trump explained the drastic move to CNN and the future of USAID.

“It’s been run by a bunch of radical lunatics, and we’re getting them out, and then we’ll make a decision.”

Trump’s decisive action came after DOGE gained access to USAID’s financial records, exposing rampant fraud, unauthorized expenditures, and what appears to be the agency’s defiance of executive orders.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been appointed as the acting director to oversee the agency’s dismantling and the redirection of foreign aid policies.

JUST IN: A "manifesto" was reportedly sent from Trump hotel bomber Matthew Livelsberger to @samosaur.

The alleged manifesto states that he was not under "duress."

In the alleged email, it appears Livelsberger warns Americans about drones. 👀 @samosaur Report via @ShawnRyan762

JUST IN: KOAA confirms the now-deceased Las Vegas cybertruck driver is one Matthew Livelsberger.

Local 9 news reports the suspect had a military background.

This would corroborate reports that Livelsberger was an intelligence manager and Green Beret vet nearing retirement.


Note: This would be the second Army veteran to have been involved in the New Year's Day attacks, if definitively confirmed to be the suspect.

BREAKING.🚨

Third spending bill just dropped. It is 118 pages long.

The "American Relief Act, 2025" is a sweeping appropriations bill aiming to address multiple urgent issues:

- Extends federal funding through March 2025

- Enhanced security funding for the upcoming presidential inauguration

- Disaster relief, including $30 billion for crop losses and $300 million for fisheries

- Community health centers, telehealth flexibilities, and hospital care at home initiatives funding

- Submarine programs, military base repair, and operational readiness funds

- Increased funding for cybersecurity defenses across critical government systems

- Infrastructure rebuilding in disaster-hit areas This is one of the spiciest parts. (Recall KJP's "threat" about the presidential transition earlier today.)

"Musk floods X with spending bill misinformation"

The "flood" of misinformation:

• @DOGE posts Congress wants 40% pay increase (it's actually 3.8 percent or $6,600 raise per CRS)
• @ElonMusk amplified claim it wd block J6 committee investigation (article fails to analyze: bill would protect data from investigation into J6 records deletion)
• Musk reposted suggestion the bill would pave way for new D.C. football stadium (it transfers control of site to D.C. govt, which would then develop it)
• Musk reposted @LibsofTik on biolabs, article gives phony "fact check" about bioweapons labs

That's it. The "flood" of misinformation.

We get it. The Hill's reporters are paling around with lawmakers who are p*ssed off that their garbage bills can be dissected on @X.

This is their way of trying to run cover for their spending bill and blame Americans for blowback.

It's a running narrative to serve the purpose of the U.S. government's justification of censorship and shutting down free speech.
@DOGE @elonmusk Let me add that I didn't report any of these claims except the part about the J6 committee (provided below):

https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1869450933035250051

10 Most Egregious Things in the Massive 1,547 Page Spending Bill 🧵

1. Global Engagement Center Funding

The Global Engagement Center’s censorship operations are being extended under the NDAA.

It bills itself as a defender against ‘misinformation,’ but engages in speech suppression.

It is being sued by The Federalist and the Daily Wire. 2. Hurricane Relief Attached to CR

The 1,500-page behemoth includes around $100 billion in disaster aid. This is political blackmail.

Rep. Anna Luna complained that the hurricane relief was not in a standalone bill: "We are literally being held hostage with this 'CR.' Why was Helene and Milton funding not a stand alone vote? We can vote on post offices as stand alone votes but not disaster relief?"

As fellow Republican congresswoman Nancy Mace concurred: “They're cramming everything into one giant bill and guilt-trip you if you vote against it. I’m all for hurricane relief, but stop trying to disguise reckless government spending. Call it what it is.”

This is the single best explanation out there proving J6 was a *TRAP.* 🔥 As conservative talk show host @DBongino explains, along with insight from FBI Director nominee @Kash_Patel, this proves beyond a shadow of the doubt that the Feds were complicit in the J6 “insurrection.”

Transcript of the relevant passage from Dan Bongino’s Rumble podcast is provided below.

BONGINO:

"There were FBI agents in the crowd... I have pictures. There were people in the crowd. So the IG report admits, however, that there were at least FBI assets..."

"And I want to be clear, don't get caught up in the euphemisms game, okay? FBI assets and agents are not the same thing. Michael could be working for the FBI as a paid source, a confidential human source, doesn't mean he's an FBI agent."

"So the FBI is trying to lose people, but I'm telling you both were in the crowd, agents and assets. The report now admits forever, however, that there were FBI sources in the crowd..."

"Now, I want you to watch this. This video from Kash Patel is really important. That's just gonna be the incoming FBI director if the confirmation process continues to go smoothly, which knock on wood, so far has, I'm gonna get presumptuous, but here's the interesting part about this. This is what people like Stuart Thompson in the New York Times will never cover."

"Now that we know there were 20 plus FBI assets in the crowd, some there with the permission of the FBI, that's in the report. I'm telling you there were agents in the crowd, period. The report's bullsh*t. I'm telling you for a fact, these assets take a while to cultivate. They had to be working on this for a long time. Again, I'm giving you an honest take on January 6th, no one else's. What the hell were they doing, these assets that the FBI knew were in the crowd on January 6th? What was their role there? They had to have a job. The FBI positioned them there for a reason. But the report is oddly kind of opaque on that. Are they there to incite a riot?"

"Listen to Kash Patel here on Tim Pool saying exactly this, that this takes a while to cultivate because this story isn't adding up. Check this out."

KASH PATEL:

"What you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6th. Because if you can show that, you know they've been at, hang on, but the paperwork shows having run informants, that's a six month buildup, minimum, minimum. It's not like they just dropped him into the Proud Boys and said, hey, don't disrupt, please. Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation. Forget what the videotapes show."

BONGINO:

Yes, the FBI's got documents, folks. When you develop and cultivate and inform it, you typically have to pay them. I did this federal agent work for a decade plus. There's paperwork generated. There's debriefing paperwork generated. What exactly were the informants' mission on January 6th? Why doesn't Stuart Thompson or anyone else seem even a little bit interested in this story? I promise you, if it was a left-wing BLM riot or some co-Intel pro thing, these people be all over the story.

I got more on this, folks, because the legacy media, I'm telling you, man, these guys just don't get it. That's why they're so afraid of Kash going in there. Always measure the response.

If you want the bottom-line takeaway on this, here it is: It is impossible that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had more than twenty undercover informants in the crowd on January 6 without a six-month time investment to cultivate the assets and prepare them for deployment in the January 6 operation.

Why is this significant?

Because, as the new House interim report on January 6 points out, the security was deliberately lax due to a concern for “optics.”

All this while the FBI was placing more than two dozen CHS-operatives in a crowd filled with political extremists who had no other business in Washington D.C. except to start a riot among Trump supporters.

The president’s actual supporters were with President Donald Trump listening to his speech at the Ellipse and were told to “peacefully and patriotically” make their voices heard to support the election objections, which is a constitutional process that Democrats themselves have invoked on three separate occasions since 2000.

As Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “I’ve been waiting for this.”

But while Pelosi was “waiting” for Donald Trump to go the Capitol, she was refusing to deploy the National Guard — as former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund had desperately requested three times that she do through House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who resigned one day after the January 6 incident.

All of Washington D.C. knew that there would be a contested election. This was considered to be a probable scenario as early as March 2020 and it was repeatedly wargamed by the Transition Integrity Project.

There is no viable alternative explanation than the federal government allowed the January 6 riot to happen in an effort to deprive Donald Trump of an opportunity to contest the 2020 election, and as a matter of fact, the FBI aided and abetted extremists to be at the Capitol during the election objections.

There are far too many anomalies and deviations from protocol to ignore this unmistakable conclusion. There are the Capitol Police officers holding open doors for rioters. The bizarre treatment of Ray Epps, who is one of the most egregious provocateurs of the event. The Capitol Police “escort” of the Q Anon Shaman to the Senate chamber. There is the J6 pipe bomb threat that took place at the DNC headquarters, which Kamala Harris visited for mysterious reasons. It goes on.

The new revelations that the FBI had dozens of Confidential Human Sources in the crowd proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the U.S. government was complicit in the January 6 riots.

We still don’t know the extent of that complicity. The DoD IG report is oddly silent about FBI communications with the CHS it was running on January 6.

But there is now a glimmer of hope that the American people will get the truth if Kash Patel is confirmed as FBI Director.