Arfa and her ilk today are seething over the image of Dhanvantari, the God of Ayurveda.
But once upon a Time her Arab Masters had shamelessly copied their knowledge of medicine from Sushruta, Charaka etc who credited all their work to the same Dhanvantari.
The first encyclopaedia of medicine in Arabic was Rabban Al Tabari’s Firdous Al Hikmah.
His work was highly influenced by Indian physicians such as Sushruta & Charaka.
A.L Balsham writes that Rabban Al Tabari mentions the works of Hindu Aurvedic practitioners like Charaka, Sushruta, Madhava & Vaghbata who all credited their achievements in the field of medical science to Dhanvantari that Arfa’s religious brethrens hates so much.
Historia De la Medicina, a comprehensive history dedicated to the study of medical knowledge and practices mentions Al Tabari devoted the last 36 chapters of his Firdaus Al-Hikma to describing Indian medicine citing Sushruta, Charaka & Ashtanga Hridaya.
Aha! They were even using our Ayurvedic Shilajit as well. Lol
2. Abu Bakr Al Razi (Rhazes):
A physician during the Islamic golden age wrote two books Al-Hawi & Kitab Al Mansuri. In both this book he suggests Sushrata & Charaka.
He also credits “Min Kitab Al-Hind” -“An Indian Book”
3. Ibn Sina(Avicenna)
The famous physician of the Muslim world, literally learnt Arithmetic from an Indian grocer. Lol
During his time Indian science was so widely known in Baghdad that his work bears reflection to Indian science just like his contemporaries.
4. German Physician Meyerhof suggested how Indian medicine influenced Arabic medicine as there are frequent mentions of Indian names of medicins and herbs that were unknown to the Greek Medical tradition.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.