🧵Critical Thread. Close review of Gaza casualty figures reported by UN OCHA based on daily Hamas “Ministry of Health” numbers proves they are FALSIFIED. Women & children are grossly inflated. This is easily proven but media ignores. See detailed expose below: 1/
UN OCHA publishes a daily “flash update” since Oct 8 and cites detailed Gaza casualty figures provided by Hamas. The website and data is available to the public here: Sometime in October the UN provided the data in graphic form, here is the latest. 2/ ochaopt.org/crisis
It is immediately obvious that Hamas does not report ANY combatant deaths & the numbers amazingly seem to indicate that IDF bombs & bullets disproportionately hit women, children & elderly. They IDF CANNOT seem to hit too many fighting age men. But the numbers are faked. 3/
It first becomes apparent on Oct 19 reporting where Hamas reports 3,785 deaths vs 3,478 prior day or +307. But children killed magically move up from 853 to 1,524 or +671. Oct 18 reporting deaths were 25% children but next day it jumps to 40%! UN published detail is below: 4/
No explanation is given. There is no adjustment at later dates. The running count continues from 1,524 until today. No questioning, no skepticism from UN, NGOs or media on how the children killed number jumps all of a sudden. But there are more falsifications at later dates. 5/
Oct 26 Hamas reported 7,028 fatalities vs 6,547 prior day or +481. Remarkably women & children killed jump by +626 that same day! (See my math in blue below). No men died that day apparently. Again, no hint of shame or skepticism by UN to publish these Hamas numbers. 6/
More Hamas fabricated numbers. October 29 +302 new fatalities were reported but somehow comprised of +199 women and +129 children which comes to +328 or 26 more than total fatalities! (My math shown in blue) Men came back to life? But sure, let’s rely on these statistics. 7/
More daily lies. On Oct 31, 8,525 reported fatalities vs 8,309 prior day or +216. New fatalities of women & children were +210. (Detail for Oct 30 presented by UN in text format). Which means ONLY SIX men of any age were killed that day! That’s 2.8% of that day's fatalities! 8/
There’s more. On Nov 7 Hamas reported 10,328 total fatalities vs 10,022 prior day or +306. New fatalities of women & children +302. Which means ONLY FOUR men of any age were killed that day! That’s 1.3% of that day's fatalities. This is what NGOs & UN rely upon. 9/
Another unmentioned changed: as of Nov 20 “Ministry of Health” stopped reporting numbers and since then it’s the “Media Office” taking charge. Hamas is not even pretending that these numbers are reliable anymore it's just PR. Retweet to media outlets to expose these lies. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded the IDF killed ONLY civilians in an Oct 10, 2023 attack has now been proven to have killed senior PIJ commander Ashraf al-Qara (ID 413317470, Age 53). This is the 3rd case found recently. Airwars will you update the data? 1/
Airwars' assessment for the strike assumed civilian status for everyone, although in this case they had clues 53 year old Al-Qara was a commander. But they still counted him as a civilian. Now you know @Airwars @Emily_4319 @Anna_Zahn1 @desilva_rowena 2/ airwars.org/civilian-casua…
Here is the second case of an Airwars analysis that assumed only civilians were killed: in fact it also killed confirmed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). 3/
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded IDF killed ONLY civilians based on "local sources" has now been proven to have killed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). This is the 2nd case found recently. The Yassin family head was a terrorist leader. 1/
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! Seriously. 2/
But with just a handful of recent Hamas & PIJ martyr notices showing Oct 2023 deaths, the narrative is badly cracking. Mo’men Amin Jabara al-Agha, age 27—listed by Airwars as a civilian—was honored by Hamas as member of al-Qassam Brigades. Yassin is the second case found. 3/
đź§µToday we learn based on Hamas & PIJ admissions that a so-called journalist, Doctors without Borders worker & nursing supervisor at Kamal Adwan Hospital were combatants killed in action. IDF did not target civilians but terrorists posing as them. The truth will be revealed. 1/
This thread identifies these persons from PIJ martyr notices. Hamas and PIJ are revealing more and more of their losses. @GabrielEpsteinX continues to expose the truth. 2/
🧵Airwars is often cited as “proving” excessive civilian harm in IDF airstrikes. But within only a handful of recent Hamas martyr notices, a strike they labeled “civilian-only” included a confirmed combatant. As more notices emerge, the @airwars "evidence" will collapse. 1/
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! 2/
This outcome isn’t a surprise. Airwars has no reliable way to identify combatants in Gaza. Hamas & PIJ don’t publish combatant or casualty lists, fighters wear civilian clothes, live in family homes, and Gazans are instructed to conceal combatant deaths. 3/
🧵The Gaza WWI cemetery story should focus on Hamas militarizing it with tunnels & rockets. That’s the war crime. That’s the depravity. The destroyed corner is where the tunnel detonation occurred. As usual, only Israel’s response is condemned. Sources & details: 1/
In August 2025 the IDF destroyed a km long tunnel adjacent to the cemetery. This has been geolocated in detail, confirming the demolition occurred where the current damage is found. 2/
đź§µAccording to many military experts like @EvansRyan202 @Mpolymer apocalyptic images of Gaza, like below are prima facie evidence of disproportionate attacks. Eyesight is all you need to know. The US would not do this. Is that true? Scroll down for more photos and the answer. 1/
Large areas were totally destroyed or damaged. It's true, like here: