there's a joke on here that goes something like this:
"i asked him how much it would cost to make this today. i will never forget his answer. 'we can't, we don't know how to do it anymore.'"
I unironically think this is true of pants 🧵
even people who don't know much about bespoke tailoring can probably guess at least two of the major steps: 1) drafting and cutting the pattern, and 2) sewing the pieces together. but most people don't think about the ironing.
ironwork in tailoring is not the same as what you do at home. when you iron a shirt, your goal is to get out the wrinkles and press the garment flat. but in tailoring, ironwork is used to create shapes.
this means using water and a heavy iron to shrink and stretch the fabric, and create fullness where you need. a japanese tailor here demonstrates part of the process. the video is long (10 mins), but you can fast forward to see the transformation.
when making trousers, ironwork is important because human legs are not straight, like you'd see on a chair. instead, they bend and curve, forming something like a backwards S shape.
it's not difficult to accomodate those curves if you wear full trousers (pic 1), but what happens if you wear slim pants (pic 2)? well, all of a sudden, the trousers can catch at the front of your thigh and the back of your calves, causing messy wrinkles.
if you want to cut a proper pair of slim pants, you need to get the trousers to bend along the same path as your legs. this is where ironwork comes in. see how these flat pieces of fabric are shaped
(images from the blog tuttofattoamano)
the results can be dramatic
in the first panel, these pants have been sewn straight with no manipulation, shrinking, or stretching
in the second & third panels, the pants were taken apart and each of the panels were manipulated with an iron. then they were sewn together again
this is how a tailor is able to create trousers that seemingly defy physics. this is colin hammick, the late managing director of huntsman. check his left leg in the left photo. the trousers curve along the path of his leg, resulting in a smooth line.
the problem with ironwork is that it doesn't last. think of how a woman might put curls into her hair. the shape stays for a while, but the hair—especially if put in contact with heat or humidity—will eventually relax. then they have to use a curling iron again.
eventually, the shaping put into a tailored garment falls out, and you will have to bring it to a tailor (this sort of shaping is not something you can do). the problem: no one really offers this kind of service anymore. as the meme goes: "we don't know how"
most people don't wear suits with any regularity, so the industry around this has shrank. most towns don't have a good store for ready-to-wear suits, let alone custom suits, and let alone the support services necessary for regular maintenance (e.g., ironwork).
and so, most of us are stuck with subpar pants. this has been particularly bad in the last twenty years, as slim fit has dominated everything. the slimmer your pants, the more likely they will catch on your legs in awkward places. very obvious here when you lighten the photos.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have you ever noticed that old clothes online sometimes look better than old clothes in your closet?
Why is that? 🧵
It's often said that clothes were better made in the past. This is true to some degree, although the discussion is often narrowly focused on durability.
In this thread, I'll focus on something else: how clothes age, which affects how long you enjoy wearing them.
I'll give you some examples.
A hundred years ago, denim was mostly woven on slow shuttle looms, which produced a narrow-width fabric that was finished with a self-edge (selvedge). This fabric was taken straight off the loom and given to factories.
A couple of years ago, I saw Jesse Watters on Fox News say that Otaa ties are "the best ties in the world."
So I bought one.
Otaa is an Australian neckwear company that has been showing up a lot in American politics. Along with Jesse Watters, they appear to be favored by RFK Jr. and his top deputy, Jim O’Neill.
Let me tell you a beautiful story about this couch. 🧵
IG msviciousdesign
Some will recognize these motifs as Mughal paintings, which flourished on the Indian subcontinent sometime between the 16th and 18th century. But menswear nerds will recognize them as something else: Drake's of London.
Left: thrifted couch
Right: Drake's of London scarf
Drake's of London is a menswear label that started in the 1970s, initially with men's accessories, but having since grown to a full line of apparel. They are known for many things, but this print is perhaps their most famous. It appears on scarves, pocket squares, and even ties.
Style lessons from Robert Redford, one of the most stylish men in the last century. 🧵
A tailored jacket continues to be one of the most flattering things you can wear. However, for it to look good, it has to fit right. That means a jacket that bisects you halfway from your collar to the floor when you're in heeled shoes. Also trouser + suit jacket silhouette flows
It also helps to know how to use this visual language, especially with regard to ideas about formality. For instance, a dark business suit cries out for a tie. If you don't want to wear a tie, try a more casual garment, like a sport coat.
Let's start with a test. Here are two tan polo coats. One is machine-made. The other is handmade. Can you guess which is which?
Please answer before moving on. Then you can scroll through the answers to see whether most people got it right.
The first coat is machine-made. It's from an American ready-to-wear company called J. Press. The second is handmade. It's from a London bespoke tailoring house called Anderson & Sheppard.
You can spot the difference by how the edges are finished.
I've seen people here suggest Obama was a stylish president. I couldn't disagree more. Outfits like these read better in 2025, but during the slim-fit, Euro style craze of his presidency, Obama was routinely panned for his "frumpy dad style." See Vanity Fair.
His style transformation really came post-presidency. I suspect, but don't have proof, that this is partly the influence of his wife, who is quite stylish. Even his suits look better now. See clean shoulder line + shirt collar points reaching lapels + nice four-in-hand dimple.