there's a joke on here that goes something like this:
"i asked him how much it would cost to make this today. i will never forget his answer. 'we can't, we don't know how to do it anymore.'"
I unironically think this is true of pants 🧵
even people who don't know much about bespoke tailoring can probably guess at least two of the major steps: 1) drafting and cutting the pattern, and 2) sewing the pieces together. but most people don't think about the ironing.
ironwork in tailoring is not the same as what you do at home. when you iron a shirt, your goal is to get out the wrinkles and press the garment flat. but in tailoring, ironwork is used to create shapes.
this means using water and a heavy iron to shrink and stretch the fabric, and create fullness where you need. a japanese tailor here demonstrates part of the process. the video is long (10 mins), but you can fast forward to see the transformation.
when making trousers, ironwork is important because human legs are not straight, like you'd see on a chair. instead, they bend and curve, forming something like a backwards S shape.
it's not difficult to accomodate those curves if you wear full trousers (pic 1), but what happens if you wear slim pants (pic 2)? well, all of a sudden, the trousers can catch at the front of your thigh and the back of your calves, causing messy wrinkles.
if you want to cut a proper pair of slim pants, you need to get the trousers to bend along the same path as your legs. this is where ironwork comes in. see how these flat pieces of fabric are shaped
(images from the blog tuttofattoamano)
the results can be dramatic
in the first panel, these pants have been sewn straight with no manipulation, shrinking, or stretching
in the second & third panels, the pants were taken apart and each of the panels were manipulated with an iron. then they were sewn together again
this is how a tailor is able to create trousers that seemingly defy physics. this is colin hammick, the late managing director of huntsman. check his left leg in the left photo. the trousers curve along the path of his leg, resulting in a smooth line.
the problem with ironwork is that it doesn't last. think of how a woman might put curls into her hair. the shape stays for a while, but the hair—especially if put in contact with heat or humidity—will eventually relax. then they have to use a curling iron again.
eventually, the shaping put into a tailored garment falls out, and you will have to bring it to a tailor (this sort of shaping is not something you can do). the problem: no one really offers this kind of service anymore. as the meme goes: "we don't know how"
most people don't wear suits with any regularity, so the industry around this has shrank. most towns don't have a good store for ready-to-wear suits, let alone custom suits, and let alone the support services necessary for regular maintenance (e.g., ironwork).
and so, most of us are stuck with subpar pants. this has been particularly bad in the last twenty years, as slim fit has dominated everything. the slimmer your pants, the more likely they will catch on your legs in awkward places. very obvious here when you lighten the photos.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.
After this post went viral, I called Caroline Groves, a world-class bespoke shoemaker, to discuss how women's shoes are made. I normally don't talk about womenswear, but I found the information interesting, so I thought I would share what I learned here. 🧵
Footwear is broadly broken into two categories: bespoke and ready-to-wear. In London, bespoke makers, including those for women, are largely focused on traditional styles, such as wingtip derbies and loafers. Emiko Matsuda is great for this.
In Paris, there's Massaro, a historic firm that has been operating since 1894, now owned by Chanel. Their designs are less about creating the women's equivalent of traditional men's footwear and more about things such as heels or creative styles. Aesthetic is still "traditional."
Earlier today, Roger Stone announced his partnership with a menswear company, where together they've released a collection of tailored clothing items.
Here is my review of those pieces. 🧵
The line is mostly comprised of suits and sport coats, supplemented with dress shirts and one pair of odd trousers (tailor-speak for a pair of pants made without a matching jacket). Suits start at $1,540; sport coats are $1,150. One suit is $5,400 bc it's made from Scabal fabric
Let's start with the good points. These are fully canvassed jackets, meaning a free floating canvas has been tacked onto the face fabric to give it some weight and structure. This is better than a half-canvas and fully fused construction, but requires more time and labor.
Here is a guide breaking down what goes into quality men's footwear. This is focused on men's shoes, as women's shoes, depending on the style, will have different construction techniques and thus standards. 🧵
First, let's set a standard. What does it mean for a pair of shoes to be "good quality?" In this thread, I define that standard to be two things:
— Do the shoes age well?
— Can they be easily repaired?
In short, you should want and be able to wear the shoes for a long time.
We'll start with the part most people see: the uppers.
Quality uppers are made from full grain leather, which shows the natural grain of the hide (pic 1). Low quality uppers will be made from corrected grain, where bad leather has been sanded and given a chemical coating (pic 2)
When I was on a menswear forum, one of my most controversial opinions was that certain coats look better when they're worn open, while others look better when they're closed.
For instance, which of these two outfits look better to you? 🧵
If you shop for an overcoat today, there's a good chance you'll land on a single breasted. As suits and sport coats have receded from daily life, the types of outerwear that men historically wore with them have also slowly disappeared.
If you look at the past, men had all sorts of designs to wear over their tailored clothing: polos, Ulsters, Balmacaans, Chesterfields, paletots, wrap coats, etc. They were offered in a wider range of materials: gabardine, camelhair, covert, heavy tweeds, etc.
The reason why this looks off is bc the coat is built from many layers of material — haircloth, canvas, and padding — which sits on top of another jacket with similar structure. This can make you look a bit like a linebacker. If you find this to be the case, switch to a raglan 🧵
A raglan is defined by its sleeve construction. Most coats have a set-in sleeve, which is to say the sleeve attached to a vertical armhole, much like a shirt. A raglan, by contrast, has a diagonal seam running from the neck to armpit. Historically, this was put on raincoats.
A raglan construction is a bit more waterproof that its set-in sleeve counterpart because there's not vertical seam in which water can sit and eventually penetrate. But most importantly, it's completely devoid of padding. This results in a softer, rounder shoulder line. Compare: