Something that I've likely always known but just couldn't allow myself to accept is that we very much are likely living through some form of collapse. I think that we are at the point where governments can no longer respond to crises because the response would cause a crises in
the system that caused the original crisis. It's a feedback loop. It's one that I'm not sure we are actually capable of escaping.
This is happened so many times in history to so many civilizations.
So the real job right now is to try to build a stable life during an actual collapse. I'm not sure it's possible.
I think people that have lived in societies that have collapsed, but managed to escape, will keenly recognize a lot of what we are seeing going on around us right now. The difference this time is I don't know that there's any place to flee to.
I think even the statistics that a lot of governments use to determine if things are healthy or not are probably flawed in themselves. They don't actually reflect the crisis early enough to allow a sensible response. I think they are actually trailing indicators.
Of course things aren't quite bad enough for most people that they are still able to stumble along pretending everything's hunky-dory, but core components of our societal systems are showing super alarming signs of problems.
The kind of problems that people won't realize until they need them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay so the thing that's starting to annoy the hell out of me a lot right now is people saying that respirators need to be perfectly fit to be effective. This isn't exactly true. People need to start looking at this as a system. You need to look at system wide efficiencies.
If you have 10 people in a room and two or three of them are infectious & you are the only one wearing a respirator, yes the fit becomes very important. If you have 10 people in a room and two or three of them are infectious &
Those two or three are wearing a respirator, even not a perfectly fit one & six or seven other people are also wearing respirators. The rate of transmission in that room will drop dramatically.
Every time I speak with someone who has not been reading the thousands of papers that have been released in the last couple of years, I have a little freak out internally because of how little most people actually understand about this virus & the risks associated with it.
This is an extremely insidious virus. It can infect every location on your body that has ace2 receptors.
It's also been shown to directly infect components of our immune system. This has massive implications. It can also cause damage to neural tissue. The list of things this virus can do is extensive. You definitely need to be worried about this virus. Infections are not benign.
So this is a pretty interesting study for lots of reasons, primarily that they used air sampling to test for SARS2 & IAV in schools. If there was any doubt that kids are being bathed in SARS2 virus, this should settle it. Wow.
So here's the thing, pre-sars2 children would on average get between 6 and 8 respiratory infections a year. Let's say each infection takes 7 days to get over (it's actually more than that for some). That's 42 to 56 days sick a year. COVID comes along & adds 2 more events.
Now that's between 56 & 70 days sick a year. All of that is assuming that covid doesn't actually have any impact on the immune system, which we know with absolute certainty that it does.
Maybe a bunch of those days before the kids were only a little bit sick, so we didn't
really pay much attention because they were able to do things while they were sick thanks to a healthy immune system.
Add in a little bit of immune system impairment & now you have forums of parents wondering why their kids are sick all the time.
So I've been scouring the literature looking for any documented incidents of "immunity debt" among astronauts that have stayed on the ISS. This is a extremely well studied and monitored population. Surprise!!! There isn't anything described in the literature
that would indicate anything like "immunity debt", as a matter of fact what is described is an increase in virus reactivation due to immune dysregulation from stressors like microgravity and radiation.
One of the things that I think about often is what is the actual scientific case for allowing this virus to circulate completely unchecked within human populations?
I mean there's been a few hypotheses that have pretty much all been debunked. Continuous circulation has not brought about an end to death and disability. Continuous circulation has not brought about a reduction in mutation.
What is the scientific basis for promoting it?
I mean if you get out of the Twitter trollbot replies and into the real world of serious people, what is the actual case for allowing continuous unmitigated circulation? Absolutely every metric that I look at & every study that I read shows this to be a very bleak future.