A few people asked me in interviews last week what could possibly be done to break the Woke out of the cult at this point, and even though I'm not a Christian, I reminded them that Christianity literally has a great model set up for this. I'll explain.
The process really has three parts: 1) Proclaim the truth (tell without coercion or force) 2) Remind them that everyone is a sinner (so everyone makes mistakes) 3) Invite them to repent in their own time (accept your past error as wrong and move forward productively).
The reason this model is so important is because of some psychological and social effects we can generally call "backfire." Once people have committed an error, it's very difficult for them to own it. It's a really humbling thing, and if the error is costly, it can be impossible.
The first step, proclaiming the Gospel (or telling them the truth without forcing them to accept it), is necessary for them to know the truth, thus the error, and to consider it for themselves on their own terms. There's nothing to rebel against except in petulance.
Knowing the truth induces the dissonance between truth and falsity, right and wrong, and creates an opening for what the Greeks called "aporia" (wonder). The Christian model is to proclaim the truth and then wait as a landing pad for people who find themselves wondering.
The hard part is the shame and isolation that come with knowing you did wrong, especially if it caused harm (especially to children or society). It's hard to own that. Christianity reminds us that we're all sinners. We all do wrong. It's part of being human. It's NORMAL.
By reminding people that anyone can and will make these kinds of mistakes in one way or another, they can get past the barriers of shame and isolation that prevent them from taking the path of repentance for their errors. It's impossible to explain how important this part is.
The doctrine that we are all sinners, apart from Christ, is a powerful tool for getting people who have committed major mistakes to realize that it could have happened to almost anyone and isn't a peculiar defect in themselves. This opens a door to repentance and growth.
Incidentally, the poisoned Woke doctrine of "complicity" mirrors this approach and twists people into the cult rather than out of it by inverting the circumstances in the typical Gnostic way. It calls on people to repent of being normal in favor of being Ideal, which is evil.
Notice that the Christian model is not one of "complicity in sin," although sects that turn pretty puritanical (just like Woke) take that up sometimes. You are a sinner, but you can repent of your sin and embrace a better path. This innocence mechanism is powerful too.
I'mma get shit from the theologicals now. LOL idec.
Finally, when one is ready, there is an invitation or call to repentance for error in Christianity, which is a moment of owning and reconciling the self to the mistake and its consequences, righting oneself against it, and taking appropriate action to make amends when needed.
You cannot possibly leave a cult without repenting of having been in the cult and having made the mistake of having fallen for the cult. It's not possible. You have to own your own failings and really feel what they mean, then you have to reconcile after with self and others.
The Catholic rite of Confession formalizes and instrumentalizes this, and it has had a reasonably good track record of helping people repent and restore their ability to feel prosocial while providing a mechanism for reintegration into the community, e.g.
Of course, these things require so much responsibility to avoid corruption too. The Catholic rite of Confession was also the doorway to the perversion of Indulgences and God knows what other evil. It must be done right. I offered it only as an example.
In sum, the Christian model offers a path out of error, even if one doesn't take the Christian path of rebirth through accepting Christ as Savior model. You have to know the truth, realize error is common and be humble with less judgment, and do repentance and reconciliation.
Christians have already proved that this model can be done at the scale of civilizations, so there's absolutely no reason to believe the West is a lost cause with its badly damaged generations of youth and widely poisoned minds and institutions. Hope springs eternal.
On the other hand, pathways like hardline, mandatory, or even strongly socially enforced Christianity betray this entire model and will induce backfire, even if they provide temporary stability. "Christian Nationalism" isn't the answer, nor is "Integralism" or theocracy.
Proclaiming the truth and inviting people into aporia and eventual repentance cannot happen under the force of hard power or even hegemonic demand. Tyranny to make it "work" will always be the result because rebellion will follow like night follows day.
There's no collection basket at the Church of James. Happy Sunday. Look for corruption in your life, repent of it, then forgive yourself for it. You'll be a happier person and more effective and productive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The main reason Western nations like the United States and Canada were able to be infiltrated and subverted by Woke Marxism is because the our universities and their faculties completely dropped the ball. We all kind of know this, but there are important points to dig out of it.
It's really obvious that the infiltration and subversion of knowledge and the professions, including especially education, came about because the universities allowed Woke and its conceptual precursors to grow like a nasty fungus throughout its halls. Why?
There are lots of reasons, many of which have been discussed, like wanting to be on the Progressive Vanguard of society to look smart, the perversion of academic publishing, academics largely lacking backbone and being socially moldable, universities wanting money, etc.
Harvard Business Review writes "Where does DEI go from here?" The correct, long-overdue answer is "in the trashcan," or, doing one better, "on the ash heap of history." hbr.org/2023/09/where-…
You would think Harvard Business could, with all their genius, figure out why DEI is under attack, rightly, but they can't. It's because it's destructive (as far as most people can tell), a grift (fairly obviously), and Communism (as many people now see). They want recommitment!
Their plan is just more Maoism, though. "To bring advocates and critics of this work together, leaders must orient around [Mao's formula of 'unity, criticism, unity']." Then they pull some stats to try to pretend their case is real, objective, and necessary, but that's a prop.
Mathematical proofs are logical verifications of truth value statuses of statements within axiomatic systems, i.e., all the statements that logically deduce from a set of axioms, which are meant to be self-evidently true statements or ones provisionally agreed upon to act as such
We derive most of our first axioms directly from observation of nature, though they might be retooled from there. When we agree upon a set of axioms, including more abstract ones (axioms of choice or infinity, e.g.), we tend to announce that we're using them.
Around 500 years ago, the printing press was invented, and the powers-that-be flipped out because people would be able to do their own reading.
Now, the internet has been invented, and the powers-that-be are flipping out because the people can do their own research.
It's not similarly disruptive that people now can do their own research and investigations (and reporting) as compared to people being able to do their own reading. It's vastly more disruptive. They could somewhat control what people would have access to read. Now look at now...
What happened 500 years ago is that a Magisterium of Information fell as reading became commonplace, but a feudal-style Aristocracy of Information arose to control information through editorial and publishing gatekeeping mechanisms. The internet shatters those.
Woke is what happened when neo-Marxist Critical Theory, especially feminist Postmodern Theory, and Maoist insurgency went to the dumbest part of the university: colleges of education. That's part of why it's so childish. It was designed by morons for kids.
I've put a lot of attention on Paulo Freire for developing the roots of Critical Pedagogy, for example. He got the idea from Mao, says so in Pedagogy of the Oppressed, plus his Liberation Theology (Marxism) and Third-Worldism (Postcolonial Marxism). What's he about?
Have you noticed that Woke people just complain all the time? Like ALL THE TIME about EVERYTHING? That's Paulo! That's neo-Marxist Critical Theory passed through colleges of education. Paulo taught a simple formula in place of education, something even kids and morons can do.
The logic of the day is extremely simple. There is a (Communist) revolution against the West. Those who support the revolution are "the people" (global citizens) who see "from the people's standpoint." Everyone else is "the enemies of the people" who must be hated and destroyed.
I know the font is almost unreadable on many devices, but this is Mao talking about "the people" and "the enemies of the people" in China in 1957. Those who support the revolution are "the people." Those who don't are "the enemies of the people." It's that simple.
This Maoist program is the institutional program of our day in the West. Representatives of "the people" are those who see issues from what Maoists called "the people's standpoint," which is the "context" that means "the people" are always justified, no matter how awful.