Of the 1 in 9 Canadian adults who have experienced Long Covid since the start of the pandemic:
📍80% experienced symptoms for at least 6 months or more;
📍58% are still continuing to experience long-term symptoms as of June 2023, ie. they have never recovered.
But perhaps the most interesting thing in this report is this chart which looks at the impact of cumulative infections.
The risk of developing Long Covid symptoms is:
📍15% after 1 infection
📍25% after 2 infections
📍38% after 3+ infections - that’s 1 in every 2.6 people!
Let’s just take a moment to appreciate that statistic.
📍38% of Canadian adults reporting 3 or more Covid infections had experienced Long Covid symptoms.
These figures make it quite clear that the more infections people have, the higher the risk is.
You might wonder what this looks like if you extrapolate it out further.
Well, @DavidSteadson has developed a model for just that.
This chart shows the cumulative probability of developing Long Covid at different estimates of risk for each additional new infection…
Plugging the figures for the risk of Long Covid from 1st, 2nd & 3rd infection from the Canadian survey into David’s model, it’s incredible how well the data fits the curve.
Worryingly, this model estimates that, after 10 infections, you have an ~80% chance of having Long Covid.
To anyone who’s been paying attention to the scientific research, these numbers will come as no big surprise.
The CDC estimate that ~1 in 5 adults now have a health condition that may be related to their previous Covid infection.
That’s 20% of us!
Here in the UK, Long Covid stopped being officially tracked in March.
At that time, ONS estimated that nearly 2 MILLION people were suffering from Long Covid - that’s nearly 3% of the entire population!
Of these, around 700k developed Long Covid since the Omicron era began.
We also know that Covid can cause significant long-term sequelae which may not always be linked back to a previous infection.
For example, a recent study by the BHF found that people who caught Covid were 5x more likely to die from heart disease in the 18 months after infection.
And, as this BBC article acknowledges, it’s very likely that at least some of the deaths which were (or will be) hastened by the after-effects of a Covid infection will *not* end up being linked to the virus when the death is registered.
The CDC even added an update to their guidance for certifying ‘Deaths due to Covid’, making it clear that clinicians should bear in mind that Covid “can have lasting effects on nearly every organ of the body for weeks, months & potentially years after infection.”
But for many, death is not the biggest risk.
Long-term chronic illness is.
Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve seen a huge rise in the number of people dropping out of the workforce altogether due to long term sickness, reaching an all-time high of 2.6 million as of July.
According to a discussion paper recently published by the Institute for Public Health Research, long-term sickness absence is now a ‘serious fiscal threat’ in the U.K.
They have called for urgent action to tackle this ‘tide of sickness’ head-on.
And, as the Canadian study at the top of this thread showed, it’s clear that the risk of developing Long Covid increases with each successive reinfection.
Just because you’ve had Covid before and were fine, it doesn’t mean you’ll be fine next time…
Covid’s effect on the brain is particularly concerning.
In the thread 🧵 below, I’ve compiled a number of scientific studies from around the world, all of which examine the long-term impact of Covid infection on the brain.
I could keep posting studies like this all day long, but instead I’ll direct you to this link where @JessicaLexicus has collated a list of 171 sources explaining the long-term harm that Covid can cause to your vital organs
And then, of course, there’s the formidable @CassyOConnor_ (MP for Clark, Tasmania until her resignation in July 2023) who gave an absolute masterclass in holding politicians to account back in June, asking the critical questions to confront the elephant in the room…
@DrTedros During this press briefing, Dr Tedros also announced that the WHO had released a series of UPDATED policy briefs outlining essential actions that policy-makers should implement to work towards comprehensive COVID-19 prevention & control.
It was announced this week that SIR CHRIS WORMALD has been named as the new Cabinet Secretary & Head of the Civil Service, one of the most powerful jobs in government.
I thought I’d take a look back at what we learned about him from his recent Covid Inquiry appearances…
🧵
In her Closing Statement at the end of module 3, the Counsel for Covid Bereaved Families for Justice UK gave a scathing appraisal of Sir Chris Wormald’s evidence, describing it as:
“…an object lesson in obfuscation, a word salad – so many, many words, so very little substance”.
And she’s absolutely right. His testimony was decidedly unimpressive.
Most of his answers were evasive, repetitive & waffly, with very little substance.
For example, in this clip he is asked about the stop order on FFP3 masks in June 2020, but fails to give a straight answer.
💚 The Green Party have published a new policy calling for urgent action to tackle the ongoing waves of Covid which are causing so much harm to the nation’s health & economy.
Huge thanks to everyone involved in making this happen.
As module 3 of the @covidinquiryuk draws to a close, I’ve been looking back at what we’ve learned about how it all went so wrong with infection control guidance for hospitals.
This is a long thread, so please grab a cuppa & make yourself comfy…
One thing that really stands out from the Inquiry testimonies is just how many professional bodies repeatedly raised the alarm about the inadequate infection control guidance in hospitals…
…and how their concerns were disregarded at every stage, with profound consequences.
The lady taking the stand in the clip above is Rosemary Gallagher, IPC Lead at the Royal College of Nursing.
She explains how, in November 2020, the government had just released a video to the public highlighting how coronavirus lingers in the air…
Matt Hancock testified that the Covid infection control guidance *had* factored in the available supply of PPE, rather than being based purely on what was required to adequately protect NHS staff…
🧵
A similar account had previously been given by Laura Imrie, a member of the IPC Cell (the group responsible for writing the guidance).
She explained how lack of supply & the need for fit testing meant they weren’t in a position to be able to recommend wider use of FFP3 masks.
However, we heard a very different story from Dr Lisa Ritchie, who chaired the IPC Cell.
She wrote in her witness statement:
“The supply of PPE did *not* influence the IPC advice provided by the UK IPC Cell.”
A Canadian teen is currently critically ill with H5N1 bird flu.
The really concerning thing about this case is that sequencing has revealed several NEW mutations which improve the virus's ability to bind to human receptors & increases its potential to spread between humans…
🧵
You can read a more technical summary of the specific mutations in the H5N1 sequence in the thread below from @HNimanFC.
Lots of interesting (and concerning) comments on the thread also.