Of the 1 in 9 Canadian adults who have experienced Long Covid since the start of the pandemic:
📍80% experienced symptoms for at least 6 months or more;
📍58% are still continuing to experience long-term symptoms as of June 2023, ie. they have never recovered.
But perhaps the most interesting thing in this report is this chart which looks at the impact of cumulative infections.
The risk of developing Long Covid symptoms is:
📍15% after 1 infection
📍25% after 2 infections
📍38% after 3+ infections - that’s 1 in every 2.6 people!
Let’s just take a moment to appreciate that statistic.
📍38% of Canadian adults reporting 3 or more Covid infections had experienced Long Covid symptoms.
These figures make it quite clear that the more infections people have, the higher the risk is.
You might wonder what this looks like if you extrapolate it out further.
Well, @DavidSteadson has developed a model for just that.
This chart shows the cumulative probability of developing Long Covid at different estimates of risk for each additional new infection…
Plugging the figures for the risk of Long Covid from 1st, 2nd & 3rd infection from the Canadian survey into David’s model, it’s incredible how well the data fits the curve.
Worryingly, this model estimates that, after 10 infections, you have an ~80% chance of having Long Covid.
To anyone who’s been paying attention to the scientific research, these numbers will come as no big surprise.
The CDC estimate that ~1 in 5 adults now have a health condition that may be related to their previous Covid infection.
That’s 20% of us!
Here in the UK, Long Covid stopped being officially tracked in March.
At that time, ONS estimated that nearly 2 MILLION people were suffering from Long Covid - that’s nearly 3% of the entire population!
Of these, around 700k developed Long Covid since the Omicron era began.
We also know that Covid can cause significant long-term sequelae which may not always be linked back to a previous infection.
For example, a recent study by the BHF found that people who caught Covid were 5x more likely to die from heart disease in the 18 months after infection.
And, as this BBC article acknowledges, it’s very likely that at least some of the deaths which were (or will be) hastened by the after-effects of a Covid infection will *not* end up being linked to the virus when the death is registered.
The CDC even added an update to their guidance for certifying ‘Deaths due to Covid’, making it clear that clinicians should bear in mind that Covid “can have lasting effects on nearly every organ of the body for weeks, months & potentially years after infection.”
But for many, death is not the biggest risk.
Long-term chronic illness is.
Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve seen a huge rise in the number of people dropping out of the workforce altogether due to long term sickness, reaching an all-time high of 2.6 million as of July.
According to a discussion paper recently published by the Institute for Public Health Research, long-term sickness absence is now a ‘serious fiscal threat’ in the U.K.
They have called for urgent action to tackle this ‘tide of sickness’ head-on.
And, as the Canadian study at the top of this thread showed, it’s clear that the risk of developing Long Covid increases with each successive reinfection.
Just because you’ve had Covid before and were fine, it doesn’t mean you’ll be fine next time…
Covid’s effect on the brain is particularly concerning.
In the thread 🧵 below, I’ve compiled a number of scientific studies from around the world, all of which examine the long-term impact of Covid infection on the brain.
I could keep posting studies like this all day long, but instead I’ll direct you to this link where @JessicaLexicus has collated a list of 171 sources explaining the long-term harm that Covid can cause to your vital organs
And then, of course, there’s the formidable @CassyOConnor_ (MP for Clark, Tasmania until her resignation in July 2023) who gave an absolute masterclass in holding politicians to account back in June, asking the critical questions to confront the elephant in the room…
To anyone paying attention, these illness absence figures should not come as a surprise.
By early December, UKHSA was warning about how flu was spreading like wildfire through classrooms, leading to very high infection rates in school-age children (pink & green lines on chart).
“When it comes to flu, the focus is often on droplet transmission, but there’s also evidence of aerosol transmission. That means that ventilation & air filtration are HUGELY important.
“Are the Govt looking to improve that to help deal with all the respiratory infections?”
On the BBC News this evening, Medical Editor @BBCFergusWalsh clearly stated:
“As for facemasks, simple surgical masks are *not* good at stopping viruses. You really need a properly fitted tight respirator mask for that”…
/1
…which begs the question, why does the NHS infection control guidance STILL only recommend surgical masks for treating patients with airborne viruses like flu & Covid… and not proper FFP3 masks?
Even Baroness Hallett was rather perplexed by this during the Covid Inquiry.
/2
The IPC experts (Dr Warne & Dr Shin) who provided independent specialist advice to the Covid Inquiry both stated that IPC guidelines should be updated to recommend routine use of FFP3 masks when caring for patients with ANY respiratory virus.
1️⃣ He only mentions that people who are sick “must wear a mask in public spaces”…
…but why did he not also suggest that people who are *not* sick should wear a mask to prevent themselves getting sick in the first place?!
Like this ⬇️
2️⃣ Why didn’t @danielelkeles mention FFP masks?
Surgical masks DON’T protect against airborne transmission of flu.
“Live viruses could be detected in the air behind ALL surgical masks tested. By contrast, properly fitted respirators could provide at least a 100-fold reduction.”