Of the 1 in 9 Canadian adults who have experienced Long Covid since the start of the pandemic:
📍80% experienced symptoms for at least 6 months or more;
📍58% are still continuing to experience long-term symptoms as of June 2023, ie. they have never recovered.
But perhaps the most interesting thing in this report is this chart which looks at the impact of cumulative infections.
The risk of developing Long Covid symptoms is:
📍15% after 1 infection
📍25% after 2 infections
📍38% after 3+ infections - that’s 1 in every 2.6 people!
Let’s just take a moment to appreciate that statistic.
📍38% of Canadian adults reporting 3 or more Covid infections had experienced Long Covid symptoms.
These figures make it quite clear that the more infections people have, the higher the risk is.
You might wonder what this looks like if you extrapolate it out further.
Well, @DavidSteadson has developed a model for just that.
This chart shows the cumulative probability of developing Long Covid at different estimates of risk for each additional new infection…
Plugging the figures for the risk of Long Covid from 1st, 2nd & 3rd infection from the Canadian survey into David’s model, it’s incredible how well the data fits the curve.
Worryingly, this model estimates that, after 10 infections, you have an ~80% chance of having Long Covid.
To anyone who’s been paying attention to the scientific research, these numbers will come as no big surprise.
The CDC estimate that ~1 in 5 adults now have a health condition that may be related to their previous Covid infection.
That’s 20% of us!
Here in the UK, Long Covid stopped being officially tracked in March.
At that time, ONS estimated that nearly 2 MILLION people were suffering from Long Covid - that’s nearly 3% of the entire population!
Of these, around 700k developed Long Covid since the Omicron era began.
We also know that Covid can cause significant long-term sequelae which may not always be linked back to a previous infection.
For example, a recent study by the BHF found that people who caught Covid were 5x more likely to die from heart disease in the 18 months after infection.
And, as this BBC article acknowledges, it’s very likely that at least some of the deaths which were (or will be) hastened by the after-effects of a Covid infection will *not* end up being linked to the virus when the death is registered.
The CDC even added an update to their guidance for certifying ‘Deaths due to Covid’, making it clear that clinicians should bear in mind that Covid “can have lasting effects on nearly every organ of the body for weeks, months & potentially years after infection.”
But for many, death is not the biggest risk.
Long-term chronic illness is.
Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve seen a huge rise in the number of people dropping out of the workforce altogether due to long term sickness, reaching an all-time high of 2.6 million as of July.
According to a discussion paper recently published by the Institute for Public Health Research, long-term sickness absence is now a ‘serious fiscal threat’ in the U.K.
They have called for urgent action to tackle this ‘tide of sickness’ head-on.
And, as the Canadian study at the top of this thread showed, it’s clear that the risk of developing Long Covid increases with each successive reinfection.
Just because you’ve had Covid before and were fine, it doesn’t mean you’ll be fine next time…
Covid’s effect on the brain is particularly concerning.
In the thread 🧵 below, I’ve compiled a number of scientific studies from around the world, all of which examine the long-term impact of Covid infection on the brain.
I could keep posting studies like this all day long, but instead I’ll direct you to this link where @JessicaLexicus has collated a list of 171 sources explaining the long-term harm that Covid can cause to your vital organs
And then, of course, there’s the formidable @CassyOConnor_ (MP for Clark, Tasmania until her resignation in July 2023) who gave an absolute masterclass in holding politicians to account back in June, asking the critical questions to confront the elephant in the room…
🚨 ONS WINTER COVID INFECTION STUDY: RELEASE CANCELLED 🚨
I’d been looking forward to finally seeing the results of the ONS Winter Infection Survey tomorrow but it’s just been announced that the release has been cancelled & we won’t see the first set of results until 21 Dec. 😡
Link to official announcement about the ONS Winter Covid Infection Study release cancellation here 👇🏻
A mainstream newspaper just said the bit they’re not supposed to speak about out loud!! 📢
“The increase in cases of people with flu like symptoms is down to a new winter bug that has taken over DUE TO COVID LOWERING IMMUNITY TO COMMON VIRUSES.”
The bit that’s not quite right is that this does not appear to be a “new winter bug” at all.
Reports suggest that the China problem is mostly due to mycoplasma pneumonia, a common bacterial infection which usually causes mild cold symptoms but can sometimes lead to pneumonia.
And then read this thread 🧵👇🏻
“Hearing that these surges in serious cases of pneumoniae in populations we don’t usually expect this from appears to be ‘just’ bacterial pneumoniae is not actually good news in the least. It’s EXTREMELY concerning, if not outright alarming.”
Chris Whitty: “The ONE situation… that you would ever aim to achieve herd immunity is BY VACCINATION. That is the ONLY situation that is a rational policy response.”
And yet… we are now longer offering boosters to the vast majority of the working age population.
A thread 🧵
According to JCVI member Dr Adam Finn, the UK’s strategy going forward is that “most under 65’s will now end up boosting their immunity NOT through vaccination, but through catching Covid *many* times.”
This is not a “new study” either - it is a “systematic review” of many old studies dating all the way back to 1977, nearly half a decade ago!!
In total, 34 studies were analysed as shown in the table below.
Of these, just 5 were published since 2020 (highlighted) 👇🏻
I took a closer look at those 5 studies to identify the actual STUDY dates (as opposed to publication dates):
📍Walker et al: 2014-2018
📍Li Zhang et al: Jun 2016-Sep 2018
📍Park et al: Aug 2017-Dec 2017
📍Phipantanakul et al: Apr 2015-Jun 2020
📍Hansel et al: Apr 2015-Jan 2019
Numerous studies have clearly shown the undeniable benefits of using air filters to prevent the spread of Covid.
For example, this study conducted on Covid wards at Addenbrooke’s hospital in Cambridge showed that air filters removed almost all traces of airborne Covid virus…
Here’s more details from that study on the Covid ward at Addenbrooke’s.
On days that the air filter was run continuously, researchers did not find ANY trace of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the air on any of the testing days - see bar on the right of the chart