My former fiance threatened to make fabricated and scandalous public accusations about me unless I paid her $9 million in one week. Two years later, a Judge ordered her to pay me $584,199.16 for fees I spent defending my innocence.
It started on April 6th, 2021 with a thirteen-page letter from her lawyers: “[Redacted] is willing to settle all of her claims against Mr. Johnson and his companies for $9 million dollars…”. After over a year of our relationship ending, for the first time ever, she was accusing me of a wide range of “abusive and perverse” behavior. Through her attorneys, she threatened to make her allegations public if I didn’t pay her $9 million dollars within one week. WTF? What claims? What wrong-doing? It must be April Fools. Am I getting punked? This person who I’d once had the most beautiful relationship with was now unrecognizable to me.
The contents of the letter were shocking, but even more shocking was the fact that this letter was arriving after we had signed a separation agreement (with the help of our attorneys) a year earlier when ending our relationship. She and her attorneys were gambling that, even though she had already agreed that we’d go our separate ways, I'd cave and pay up to avoid my reputation being publicly tarnished.
She was emboldened by lawyers blinded by their greed to take advantage of her vulnerabilities and exploit my wealth. After over six months of threatening to destroy me with more scandalous allegations in “her new podcast”, a “book deal” and a “potential TV series”, the attorneys who sent the demand letter never filed a complaint or produced a single piece of evidence to support the allegations.
Then she got new attorneys. Seeing that threats alone were insufficient, they filed a case in court and tried to make me look like a monster. I successfully moved part of the case into arbitration, where we had agreed to resolve any disputes. As their legal losses mounted, they became increasingly unhinged in what they were willing to say. Global media ate it up.
On March 31st, 2023, after extensive motions, depositions and discovery, the arbitrator dismissed all her causes of action that had been referred to arbitration and ordered that my accuser pay me $584,199.16 to reimburse attorneys' fees I’d been forced to spend defending my innocence. The ruling and award were confirmed by an active Superior Court Judge on September 29th, 2023.
After years of litigation, the corroborating evidence my accuser had of any of my accused wrongdoings? Nothing. Not a single thing. In considering my accuser’s attempt to invalidate the separation agreement she had signed, the arbitrator, a well-respected retired judge, pointed out that my accuser’s “undisputed conduct and testimony refute her claim[s].” In other words, my accuser's own evidence contradicted her own story. Noteworthy as my accuser’s day job is Chief Storytelling Officer at an implantable medical device company where trust is life and death.
The entire thing was bizarre and surreal. My accuser's attorneys were sanctioned by the Judge - a severe reprimand that courts reserve for truly egregious conduct - for making, as the Judge wrote: “serious allegations…factually and legally baseless and frivolous”. Her lawyers were ordered to pay the court a fine of $2,500. In our settlement discussions, I also insisted her attorneys pay some of what my accuser owed to me for their complicitness.
It would have been so easy to relent and quietly settle to make this go away. That’s what nearly everyone does. But I am not guilty and they gave me no choice but to spend over two years litigating to prove my innocence. Giving in and paying up would have been an injustice to me; an injustice to society enabling this twisted practice.
The legal fight was ugly and awful. The worst. The most hurtful part of the whole ordeal was that she spoke about our relationship in ways that were unrecognizable to me. For example, when she was sadly diagnosed with a serious health condition, I rearranged my life and worked non-stop beside her to beat it. We flew around the country together to meet with doctors and explore clinical trials. Together we conducted extensive research into additional therapies and tests. It was our shared omnipresent focus. When tests showed that she was in the clear and it was time to celebrate her new lease on life, who was the one person in the world she invited to be by her side at this sacred event? Me. She honored my unwavering devotion to her well-being.
The case is now wrapped and behind us. This time with a promise that she won’t sue me again, a provision the previous agreement didn’t have and which allowed her and her attorneys to weaponize the legal system for over two years. Their strategy was to inflict maximum pain and suffering on me so I’d pay up privately. They miscalculated my tenaciousness and resolve and their strategy backfired, inflicting collateral damage upon themselves. One of her attorneys is no longer with that firm and my accuser’s health deteriorated within the blast radius of her own creation.
My accuser has been astonishingly pernicious. Nonetheless, I choose, again, to support her as she works through her health challenges. The settlement funds she owes me will be routed to a trust I established for her medical needs. She is the sole beneficiary and the only person who can access this trust. I won’t keep a penny of what she pays me as part of the judgment.
Every minute of every day each of us diligently works to build and fortify our personal reputations. Showing up on time. Being respectful. Offering sympathy. Helping out. Apologizing when at fault. Telling the truth. Our reputation is our life currency. Then, in one moment, a headline can cause everyone you love and care about to question everything they thought they knew about you. A lifetime of work now in question. It’s great entertainment when it’s about someone else; a different thing when it’s your name in the headline. It’s been no fun having my name dragged through the mud and not being able to comment during the proceedings.
“Innocent until proven guilty” is a bedrock of our society. In recent years, accusations have been weaponized and exploited for profit as “guilty until proven innocent” became de facto by mob rule. Ruining people’s careers, lives and reputations. Taking away from those who legitimately need the legal system. It has created a booming, dark underground economy that has destabilized society by straining our bonds of trust.
Our social fabric is fragile; woven together by a shared trust. The accusation strategy she used is corrosive to our shared stability. I hope more people stand up to this dark and twisted practice.
Endnotes:
Before the Apr '21 thirteen page scorched-earth letter from her attorneys, my accuser's first tactic to get money from me was a letter she penned in Sep '20. She praised my integrity, spoke of our shared love, & emphasized the reciprocal care we’d show for each other.
When that didn’t work, she and her attorneys sought to disparage me and create scandal. As their legal losses mounted, they became increasingly unhinged in what they were willing to say. For example, by accusing me of bribing the arbitrator. Trying to embarrass and pressure me into private settlement. As my court filing put it:
The Judge wasn’t having their bribery fiction. She found that the attorneys “acted with reckless disregard for the truth and the law in making the accusations” and “violated” their “duties of respect and honesty.” The Judge severely reprimanded the attorneys for making “frivolous” claims with “no evidence” to support them, “undermin[ing] the dignity and integrity of th[e] court’s proceedings.” She sanctioned the attorneys $2,500.
Press, why do you gotta be like this?
watch:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
+ New science just emerged to support it
+ It’s based on DNA methylation
+ It allows me to know what is and isn’t working
Here’s an overview of how:
+ it works
+ you can find out your result
+ you can compare your results to others
0/ Speed of aging (PACE) is one of the most clinically validated aging markers.
My team and I use it extensively to measure the efficacy of health protocols.
This thread explains how biological aging clocks gained a bad reputation and how two new pre-prints take a new approach to restore confidence to the field.
1/ Addressing Skepticism:
There's been some skepticism surrounding biological age clocks. I'm going to address the arguments around epigenetic age measurements, explain why these concerns don't apply to PACE (the clock my team and I use), and discuss the new standards emerging in the field to ensure the reliable validation of these tools.
Key Takeaways:
+ Early studies often lacked rigorous methodologies in their application of biological aging clocks.
+ The field is now developing new, robust benchmarks for validating and utilizing biological aging clocks effectively.
+ Strong clinical evidence shows that PACE meets the stringent criteria for accuracy, reliability, and sensitivity.
My Vit D has been stable for years ~40 ng/mL and then spiked to 134 ng/mL after 60 sessions of HBOT.
For context: I’ve been taking ~5000 IU/day of Vit D for the past few years. My serum levels have consistently hovered around ~40 ng/mL.
Sep 2024 (pre-HBOT): 40 ng/mL
Jan 15, 2025: 67.8 ng/mL
Mar 26, 2025: 110 ng/mL
Apr 1, 2025: 134 ng/mL
Levels approaching 100 ng/mL can carry potential benefits. Beyond that is not ideal.
The threshold of toxicity sits around 150 ng/mL, and while I’m still comfortably below it, I’ve chosen to pause my 5000 IU/day dose to try and normalize levels.
I’m not concerned. Bone health is excellent (top 99.8 percentile via DEXA) and my serum calcium (9.4 mg/dL) is within the upper normal range.
So why did Vit D levels spike? We have a hypothesis.
🧵
1/ Improved intestinal bile acids
Through reversal of dysbiosis and increased growth of healthy gut bacteria.
How does it affect vitamin D?
Bile acid metabolites (especially LCA) promoted by a healthy microbiome promote vitamin D absorption into circulation.
2/ Improved intestinal barrier integrity and reduced inflammation
Increases in Akkermansia and butyrate support mucin production and maintain healthy gut lining.
How does it affect vitamin D?
A strong mucus layer prevents nutrient loss through inflammation-induced “leaks” and promotes efficient absorption into the bloodstream.
Reduced intestinal leakage also means less systemic inflammation, which decreases immune-cell consumption of vitamin D. More circulating vitamin D, less wasted in fighting fires.
That creates a positive feedback loop:
Less inflammation → More available vitamin D → Even less inflammation → Repeat.
I take 2.5 mg of Cialis daily.
Not for erections, but for longevity.
Here’s what the science says about Cialis and lifespan extension…
And why it’s not the reason behind my 3 hour long titanic nighttime erections.
🧵
0/ It sounds wild, but low-dose Cialis (tadalafil) and Viagra (sildenafil) are both drawing attention for longevity benefits.
Recent clinical evidence indicates the use of either correlates to longer survival in men, in addition to their potential for heart health, metabolism, and even brain function.
A new retrospective study evaluated the longevity potential of 407 prescription drugs in over 200,000 participants, with both Cialis and Viagra being among the surprising promising hits in men (yet to be evaluated in women, since the retrospective studies only cover existing drug use for established indications).
Sildenafil will soon be tested in the NIA’s ITP, the most credible pre-clinical longevity drug testing program in mice.
1/ My nighttime erections are better than the average 18 year old, but Cialis is unlikely to play a meaningful role in them or even my sexual function.
While it’s true that daily low-dose Cialis (2.5–5 mg) can help men with erectile dysfunction (ED) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by maintaining steady blood levels of the drug, the primary benefit is in restoring minimal normal erectile function, not enhancing already healthy sexual performance.
In one study, men with ED taking 5 mg/day of tadalafil showed an average increase of 17.75 minutes in nightly Duration of Erectile Episodes (DOEE). This threshold was considered predictive of a successful response.
My dose is half that, 2.5 mg.
However, this effect is likely limited to individuals with existing ED, as the drug appears to normalize function, not boost it. Even then, the increase is relatively modest, less than 10% compared to my typical nighttime erections lasting over 3 hours.
Another study found that 12 weeks of 5 mg/day tadalafil had no significant effect on the duration of nighttime erections, though participants reported increased confidence and improved spontaneous morning erections.
Study uses MRI ad machine learning to estimate brain age, and identifies 64 “druggable” genes that drive brain aging
0/ Published last week in @ScienceAdvances a study reported the use of brain scans with multiple deep learning models combined with gene expression analysis in blood samples and brain tissues from to identify genes that drive brain aging.
Background and details
1/ The study used brain scans and gene expression analysis data from 38,961 subjects from the UK Biobank, 6637 of which with a diagnosed brain disorders with “healthy” brains.
+ sperm 330 million
+ motility 53%
+ motile sperm 175 million
+ morphology 10% normal
Sperm health predicts testosterone, metabolic health, disease, addiction, and life expectancy.
Here’s what you need to know.🧵
0/ I have more motile sperm than the average healthy 22-29 year olds and much higher than the average fertile US man (104 million motile sperm count for the US father, age 32∓6 years).
Image above of my sperm is from a 2023 test.
1/ Sperm quality predicts health and longevity
Beyond predicting infertility, poor sperm quality also correlates with poorer health, higher incidence of age related disease, and premature death. While a total motile sperm of 20 million is enough for fertility, this number is a minimum that does not necessarily reflect good health.
I am looking into exosomes from human trophoblast stem cells (hTSC) given their regenerative potential such as anti-inflammatory effects, metabolic optimization, telomere lengthening, and cellular senescence reversal.🧵
0/ Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles released by almost all cell types. They carry bioactive cargo (RNAs, proteins, lipids) and mediate intercellular communication, influencing many cellular processes like tissue repair, inflammation, and aging.
1/ The TSC exosomes are produced by human trophoblast stem cells, these cells divide to make up the placenta and are from earlier stages of development than umbilical cord MSCs and HSCs.