THIS MORNING: Feds seek 46 months prison in Jan 6 case of Anthony Sargent, arguing he "twice shoved 2 officers away from the Capitol as they tried to retreat to safety.. twice threw a heavy object at a set of doors leading into the Capitol w/ the intent to break the doors glass"
Judge Dabney Friedrich is blistering the argument at sentencing by Jan 6 defendant Anthony Sargent, who pleaded guilty but claims he was trying to help endangered police when he threw rock at Capitol door and joined mob
(More)
Judge Friedrich says the claim is “laughable”… “I’m not buying it”
Judge says Sargent is not fully accepting responsibility, yet is claiming to be doing so
She says Sargent was not on an “altruistic” mission amid mob
Judge: “To say he broke glass to get inside (the Capitol) to help people…. I’m not buying that story at all”
Justice Dept argues Sargent was holding an officer who was being assaulted by crowd
Judge: “he threw a rock at high velocity at a Capitol door”
To say he was there to help people is “preposterous “
Defense: “it was a fluid situation and emotions were running high”
Defense says Sargent urged an officer to leave as mob attacked
Judge interjects: what gives Sargent the right to order police what to do?
After initially indicating he wouldn’t speak. Anthony Sargent addresses judge. And the back and forth is animated.
Standby
Sargent to judge about his crime on Jan. 6, “I wish I hadn’t done it. I’m not a violent person. I have massive respect for law enforcement”
Judge interjects …..
Judge counters Sargent saying “you say you have a tremendous amount of respect for law enforcement”…. yet you had to know there were police behind the Capitol doors as you threw a rock at it and approached
She says Sargent “at a minimum interfered” with police duties
Judge: “there’s still an inability” to admit responsibility.
“I’ve seen a lot of January 6 defendants who believe in 100% of their actions that day”
Judge presses Sargent again about why he threw a rock and called for a bike rack amid the mob
Sargent argues that he thought people might’ve been killing each other inside
Judge interjects: You say you have enormous respect for police, yet you thought they were killing innocent people?
Sargent responds: he thought “people were killing people and law enforcement”
Judge has called this claim “preposterous”
Justice Dept says he’s “whitewashing”
Judge Friedrich says there’s a “common thread” in Jan 6 cases and defendants
An “inability to see the other perspective”
Judge reads Sargent’s pre-Jan 6 texts and messages in which he predicts “Braveheart”-type defiance, says US is becoming “third world dump” and rattles off conspiracy theories
Judge says Sargent “has shown no sign of remorse until today”
“High degree of denial… even in the plea transcripts” in the case
Sargent, dressed in black suit with jet-black dress shirt, squeezes the bridge of his nose and grimaces as judge begins to read sentence
ALERT: Judge sentences Capitol riot defendant Anthony Sargent to 60 months in prison (5 years)
This isn’t common. Judge went well above Justice Dept recommendation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TODAY: Justice Dept will seek 78 months prison in Capitol riot case of Matthew Krol of Michigan, arguing he stole police baton and used it "to violently strike at least three police officers, badly injuring the right hand of a US Capitol Police Sergeant"
A blistering argument just now from Justice Dept at the lengthy sentencing hearing of Jan 6 defendant Matthew Krol, who’s accused of assaulting Sgt Aquilino Gonell
Prosecutor says Krol isn’t a “patriot”, isn’t a “political prisoner”
(More)
Prosecutor says of Jan 6 defendant Matthew Krol:
“He’s the only one making this case political”
“He’s certainly not a patriot. Patriots don’t use mob violence” when their political candidate loses
“That’s not patriotism, that’s domestic terrorism”
Jury returns in a few minutes in Rudy Giuliani defamation trial here at the federal court in Washington. Closing arguments next. Jury likely to get case today
I mean…. Defense attorney said Giuliani intended to testify in this trial.
And … it’s not happening.
Jury is returning … and they’re gonna get this case earlier than expected.
Giuliani defense immediately RESTS its case in defamation trial.
FLASH: Special Counsel Jack Smith asks the US Supreme Court for prompt ruling on whether Donald Trump can be prosecuted in election conspiracy criminal case in DC
The question being presented by Jack Smith to Supreme Court:
"Whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from fed. prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted.."
Jack Smith's filing to Supreme Court: "This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy"
Jury selection is underway here in DC in the defamation trial of Rudy Giuliani. The former New York City mayor was sued by two former Fulton County, Georgia, election workers, Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss
They’ll only need jury of eight .. it’s a civil trial
OK. So one prospective juror says he’s got important business to tend to this week that would interfere with trial. (Common jury selection claim)
But this isn’t your ordinary schedule issue: He says he’s organizing & leading major international intelligence conference Thursday
FLASH: Much of the gag order in Donald Trump's 2020 election conspiracy criminal case in DC is *REINSTATED*
Appeals Court: "...There is a strong public interest in what he has to say. But Mr. Trump is also an indicted criminal defendant, and he must stand trial in a courtroom under the same procedures that govern all other criminal defendants. That is what the rule of law means."
Appeals court (more): "Some aspects of the defendant’s speech pose a significant and imminent risk to the fair and orderly adjudication of this criminal proceeding, which justified protective action by the district court."