"The defendant is a widow in her 80s, disabled with osteoarthritis – and set to be made homeless in two hours."
I spent a day at court to see the situation facing tenants fighting eviction. Here's my long read on a crucible of crises: 👇theguardian.com/society/2023/d…
I shadowed @Shelter's duty solicitor at Watford County Court, Ruth Camp, as she provided courtroom representation to tenants who'd otherwise have been flying solo against the landlords trying to evict them.
What I saw, in a word, was dysfunction. Tenants being shafted by section 21 'no fault' evictions, which *still* haven't been banned. Basic repair work ignored for years by landlords. People left with rent shortfalls by the housing benefit system theguardian.com/society/2023/d…
Ruth had just minutes with some tenants before they had to go into court. With others she had about an hour - it was pure luck of the draw, based on the court's caseload at any point in time.
The only defences against s21 evictions are procedural technicalities.
I spoke to one family whose eviction had just been rubber-stamped after their landlord wanted to hike their rent.
Their council had offered them a place 200 miles away, and told them that if they refused, social services would be called in theguardian.com/society/2023/d…
Once again I will say that the obsessions of the political media class, and particularly those on its right wing, are a universe away from what is actually happening in the country, London included.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the thread gets worse from there - a roll call of Tory hotdogging. SEND ‘golden tickets’ - check. Blame the ‘middle classes’ (this, apparently, is what Tories do now) - check. ‘Oh noes the statutory duties’ - check.
‘These service pressures are what happens when you slash early intervention and increase destitution in the name of austerity’ - ahahahahaha no
The DWP is rejecting 89% of "Mandatory Reconsideration" appeals relating to initial applications for PIP - down from more than 40% in early 2021, and the lowest success rate since PIP was launched a decade ago bigissue.com/news/social-ju…
Sarah* was refused PIP after the assessor decided her possession of a fidget toy - which was written up as a "stress ball" - meant she could cope
She has diagnoses for autism, epilepsy, hypothyroidism, migraines and has struggled with multiple pelvic organ prolapses
I think since Rishi Sunak's energy bailout announcement in May there's been an unconscious conflation of two things:
- people struggling to meet their *current* energy bills
- the prospect of energy bills rising much higher
Addressing the second doesn't itself address the first
I think this is partly because Sunak's bailout pledged *up to* £1,200 for the most in-need households (with notable exclusions, eg unpaid carers) - with £1,200 the then-predicted *average* rise in energy bills
But ofc, *average* means plenty of households faced much bigger rises
And some of those households facing much bigger rises are on the lowest incomes - those with additional disability-related energy needs being an obvious example, or families with lots of children
They are struggling hugely under the *current* cap, with *existing* support
The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is meant to ensure that parents who live away from their children – known as ‘non-resident’ parents – make payments towards their children’s upkeep
Most parents owing maintenance make their own arrangements
But around 165,000 non-resident parents – 95 percent of them men – use the Collect & Pay scheme under which the CMS calculates what maintenance is owed and collects the money to pass on to the resident parent
Labour has spent over two years freaking out about how to win the support of "working people"
Now there's a cost of living crisis caused by external factors and the Tories are telling "working people" to take the hit in their pay packets and Labour... doesn't know what to say
This crisis hasn't been caused by workers' pay, so pay (and all benefits) should rise with inflation. Private and public sector.
The old adage is 'if you're explaining, you're losing' - but it's a lot simpler to explain than guff about 'wage-price spirals'
That's the fundamental issue with Labour here. Their demands that the govt 'get round the table' etc work as a defence against Tory attacks, but there's no real message beyond that. It's tactics not strategy, less still anything more principled
"The govt may find it has written political cheques to key voters that it does not have the courage to cash, leaving it risking the worst of both worlds – loudly making promises it loudly fails to deliver."
Since 2010, the govt's approach to regional inequality has gone from slash-and-burn austerity, to focusing on city-regions, to talking about towns.
The key tensions in the white paper seem to be between agglomeration and focusing on towns, and between spending and austerity
“The way towns are spoken about is totally economically illiterate. The idea that towns have got a separate economic destiny to the cities they sit in makes me feel violent, frankly,” says @notworknicola