It is interesting that this is a general phenomenon: we have derangement syndromes triggered by nAri~NgapuruSha &rUspati just like the lATarAT. I've also seen several people flip from total bhagat to dviT from one term to another. I think there're 3 distinct (but may be related)
psychologies involved here: 1. As we have mentioned before, there is a core "political orientation" everyone has. But some people especially in their teens-20s wander around a bit before reaching it because they are unable to read more complex cues. Thus, they might be le-libs
but do not find that pole right from the start before some wandering to reach it (& vice versa). 2. There are people whose identity is strongly invested in 1 or a few v.specific issues. While a political movement might be aligned in a general sense with those issues, the leader
might not care/might be slow in acting/unable to act on their specific defining issues, thus triggering anger no different from the pratipakSha. 3. An organic, deep-seated proclivity for a contrary ideological position: proclivity for unmAda. Then you will have MDS or TDS off the
bat when the said politician comes to power. That this is something organic and deep-rooted comes from its physiognomic expression. You can make out a navyonmatta correctly with high probability by just looking at them or seeing a snippet of their behavior.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given that the American Ivies are in the news these days, many think that they have recently declined. It is true that there was a big downward plummet following the kR^iShNamukha riots organized by piNDaka’s backers to overthrow the nAri~NgapuruSha. However, those who are
discerning and have interacted with Ivies for long know that even in the late 1990s-early 2000s. All of them had great science and math faculties; however, these were not in a position to fight the storm being brewed up in the fake knowledge disciplines. The said sci/math faculty
could be categorized into 3 large groups in this regard: 1. Apolitical. Despite their high IQ, they had the vaguest grasp of history and politics. Hence, they simply could not discern the origin and intent of movements in the fake disciplines. 2. Due to a certain ethno-religious
A rendering of the manifestation of supreme shakti navAtmikA of the pashchimAMnAya. The Agama explains the emergence of the navAtmikA form thus in the teaching of umA to shiva:
shashA~NkArdha-kalA j~neyA ambikA madhyachandrikA |
ekA eva parAshaktis tridhA sA cha prajAyate ||
The goddess ambikA manifest in the midst of the half-moon triplicated herself (technically the central triangle of the yantra). This triad of goddess are the shakti-s vAmA, jyeShThA and raudrI, corresponding to the first 3 deities of the vAmadeva-brahma-mantra
ebhyo yukta-viyuktebhyaH saMjAtA nava-varga-jA |
navadhA cha tridhA sA tu nava-vargAkShamAlikA ||
These 3 combine and disjoin i.e., 3 x 3 to birthing her 9 fold form. She of 9 & 3 fold forms is the 9 fold rosary of Sanskrit letters. This latter reckconing while differing among
The mUlavAtUla-marUnmatta-yuddha has shades of "Gujarat" in it. Soon after the marUnmatta-s burnt down H in lATa, their propaganda machinery aided & abetted by the mlechCha-s made it all about them forgetting who were the cause. This was reproduced in the current conflict & some
of piNDaka's backers, the same ones who are ranged against the H, are now threatening to withdraw their support to him if he goes with the mUla-s.Some of the latter who were in the anti-H ranks (including some whom the H were foolishly simping for) are now getting a real taste of
their marUnmattAdi friends. On one hand, this kolAhala among piNDaka's backers is good for the H but on the other it also give a preview of how the marU-navyonmatta alliance will act against them when the time of the nirNaya comes. As we have said before none of the trayonmAda-s
I mostly concur. Over the years I have realized that genetic determinism is a much bigger factor that abrahamo-occidentally conditioned minds like to admit. I see two vectors that might have an angle of up to 30 degs between them: 1. intrinsic religiosity & 2. sense of group ID
The best situation for a group is when there is a greater alignment between these vectors & they have a large magnitude. IMO, H tend to have relatively low alignment and moderate magnitude of the group ID vector. Thus, it is common (especially in South India) where there has been
shielding due to vijayanagara & marahaTTa-s encounter folks who have moderately strong religiosity vector but weak group ID vector which are not strongly aligned either or vice versa with the group ID coming from the Dravidian languages. I suspect in fission-fusion ape societies
Comparing the J and the H responses in the final phase of their movements for independence, the armed struggle played a critical role in both cases. Savarkar was correct in urging the H youth “to gain practice” for the impending war by participating in WW2. In the case of the J a
related idea went back to Trumpeldor, who gained experience serving the Russians. Later, many J gained experience in Polish units during WW2. This really gave their armed struggle considerable muscle and allowed them to form the ISR military as soon as the English left. After WW2
they carried out numerous attacks, killing English and their Arab or J collaborators and even took the fight to England. This was sort of like the naval revolt among the H happening at the same time. While previously the Brits would have engaged in their usual genocidal actions
It is unclear if the marUnmatta-s had any strategy in their current ghazwat. It was heavy on tactical effervescence -- something also previously seen with their coreligionist from the occupied pA~nchanada& sindhu -- but not clear if it aimed to achieve anything strategically
It that sense it was just like the 9/11 attack -- mass civilian deaths for shock value that will draw the attention of the world. While such a shock value is deeply engrained in the principle of the jihad since its founder, these attacks seem slightly different from say the
Kenyan mall ghazwat or 26/11. In the former, there seems to have been a strategic objective directed at Kenya. I also see 26/11 as a deliberate attempt by the marUnmatta-s to paralyze a H economic center and take the sheen of "Indian growth". Along with the shock value the