Maria Popova Profile picture
Dec 17 7 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Bulgaria is appropriately considered the most pro-Ru European country. Polls show 40% think the Ru-Ukr war isn't Ru's fault and this is usually chalked up to traditional pro-Ru sentiment due to Ru's role in Bg independence from the Ottoman empire and shared Orthodoxy, but...🧵
the last few days suggest that this pro-Ru sentiment might be more superficial and a knee-jerk expression of a stereotype than a deeply held/felt position. The dismantlement of the Soviet Army monument slowly taking place in the middle of Sofia illustrates this point...
OTOH, pro-Ru politicians are vocally dramatic about the dismantlement, almost as much as the Ru embassy. The president, the Socialists, and the far right Revival have called it "barbarian" and anthropomorphize the sculptures, descrying their "beheading" and "dismemberment". But..
instead of organizing protests, the pro-Ru parties are trying to disrupt the dismantlement process by going to court. Why? Because it looks like they don't have the capacity to trigger a major protest. An attempt a few days ago produced a small crowd only...
even though the removal of a monument from a park is a straightforward focal point and Bulgarians are enthusiastic protestors, having maintained months-long anti-govt protests both in 2020-21 and in 2013-2014. It just seems they're not as angry as some politicians appear to be.
To emphasize-- the pro-Ru segment is a minority; a sizable 30-40%, but a minority. Such a minority could easily sustain a major protest if it cares deeply abt an issue. My hypothesis in this 🧵is that even this minority isn't committed to a pro-Ru position strongly enough. END
PS. FWIW, the dismantlement process has been a drawn out affair. The opposition had ample opportunity to stage a protest and if a major/sustained protest had taken place, it's likely the govt would've backed off and left the monument in place.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maria Popova

Maria Popova Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PopovaProf

Apr 26
Confirms point, which should be clear to everyone by now: implementing Minsk meant "using Donbas to restructure all of Ukraine in Donbas' image", i.e. make all of Ukr a Ru proxy. When the shocked Pu finally realized that Ze wouldn't give in, he decided to invade...
Imo, the Medvedchuk TV ban point is a bit muddled in the piece. Maybe the Medvedchuk ban was the last straw, indeed, but the question is why. The piece isn't clear abt why, but the ban's importance could be construed in at least 3 ways...
1) ban meant that the rights of Ru-speakers in Ukr to have media that talks to them were violated; clearly, Pu doesn't care either about media freedom or about any constituency, so that's unlikely to have been the trigger for him...
Read 7 tweets
Mar 16
Important piece

"..allowing pro-Russia politicians to keep their mandates for the time being is a hugely positive signal for Ukrainian democracy. It proves that rule of law, due process, and freedom of speech matter in Ukraine..."
"for the time being" is key. Given the additional shift in the electorate away from pro-Ru positions due to the war, the next Ukr free/fair election's unlikely to return any politicians who hold ideologically pro-Ru positions...
Whether these MPs survive politically depends on their ability to reinvent themselves and prove they're no longer conduits of Ru influence, but represent a Ukr constituency. Some may be able to, others not.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 14
Some interesting anecdotes, which add to the argument that Ru's anti-Western turn has little to do with NATO and everything to do with anger at *domestic developments* in places Ru felt entitled to control (Chechnya and Ukraine). Pu became paranoid US was helping them leave...
but hard for the US to prevent this. US isn't responsible either for Chechnya's separatism or for Ukr's mobilization against manipulated elections. Both were due to Chechen/Ukr agency and the US role was minimal. If the US had deferred to Ru even more than it already did...
result wouldn't be a pro-Western, peaceful Ru as some like to imagine. It would've been Ru's successful reimperialization over the wishes/struggle of its neighbours. Apart from abetting the domination of the region, this policy would've still led to confrontation sooner or later
Read 4 tweets
Sep 16, 2022
Mearsheimer just said that the US was bent on integrating Ukraine 🇺🇦 into the West and pursued it through NATO/EU expansion and Ukr democracy promotion. Who knew that Ukraine was more important to the US than to Russia. #APSA2022
According to JM, controlling Ukraine is existential to Russia so much so that they will escalate to nukes rather than lose. But Russia doesn’t want to conquer Ukraine. So why is it existential to control them? No explanation from Mearsheimer.
@OxanaShevel has destroyed every argument JM made it with evidence and with poise!
Read 7 tweets
Sep 8, 2022
A 🧵for political scientists working on politics and society in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. @CambridgeUP is launching a new Elements Series on the region. The editors-- @LBustikova, @PetraGuasti, Gergana Yankova-Dimova, and I—are inviting pitches. 1/

Please, share widely!
What is a Cambridge Element? It's a short book (20-30K words) with quick turnaround. Individual Elements are original, succinct, authoritative, and peer-reviewed. They are organized into a focused series that provides coverage of key topics in the field. 2/
We will work with you closely through the review process and will promote your book when it’s out. Your book will be part of a thematically coherent series, which will increase its readership. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Jul 2, 2022
Bulgarian govt alleges that numerous pundits, journalists, pollsters, and public figures received regular payments from the Russian embassy (~2K euro per month) to present Russian narratives in the media as independent analysis...
Pro-Ru opinion makers retort that US foundations in Bulgaria give grants too. One big difference is that US funding is transparent, whereas the alleged Russian funding is under cover and deceptive. This is not just because the US is a democracy w rule of law and Ru isn't...
It's also because US funding (mostly/ideally) seeks to enhance US soft power by promoting a set of values; it doesn't prioritize loyalty to the US. Ru funding, by contrast, pushes Ru interests exclusively. Ru offers no soft power. The supreme value is loyalty to Russia.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(