In anticipation of a quick victory, Russia’s flagship news show “Vesti nedeli” gives the domestic audience two reasons of why Russia invaded Ukraine: to reshape the world and to eliminate the artificial Ukrainian nation. 1/
The Kremlin's chief propagandist Dmitry Kiselev says that Russia's primary goal is the imposition of a new world order (“novaia konstruktsiia mira”). The message “Bor'ba za mir” is intentionally ambivalent. It means both “a struggle for peace” and “a struggle for the world.” 2/
The second goal is, naturally, to abolish Ukraine as such. The existence of Ukraine creates an artificial division *within* the Russian nation based on political grounds, like in East and West Germany or in North and South Korea. 3/
What Russia seeks, he says, is “the recognition of the war as a civil one and the unification of the single nation in the end.” This is already a war *within* Russia. Odesa, he claims, is already Russia. Its residents are already "our Odesans." 4/
Emboldened by the "Ukraine fatigue" in the West and the expected end of arms supplies to Ukraine, Russian propaganda is as outspoken as never before. 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's talk about "peace." Russia invaded Ukraine in the name of "peace." In the early phase of the war, "For peace" was its main slogan.
Few seem to remember that the *previous guy* who sent tanks to redraw the borders of Eastern Europe used exactly the same rhetoric.🧵
One may recall that while the preparations for the invasion of Poland were underway, the Nazis were busy planning a "Rally for Peace" in Nuremberg. "For Germany," as Hitler said in his famous Wilhelmshaven speech in April 1939, "does not dream of attacking other nations." 2/
"We do not dream of waging war on other nations, subject, of course, to their leaving us in peace also. The German Reich is, however, in no case prepared permanently to tolerate intimidation, or even a policy of encirclement."
Familiar, isn't it? What else did he say? 3/
Russia's Federal Archival Agency has published a collection of documents "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians" to substantiate Putin's wild allegations made in his 2021 article of the same name.
A 🧵you don't want to read:
This is an extraordinary book, even by Russia's academic standards. Naturally, it opens with Putin's article, which many believe – and rightfully so – to have served as a rationale for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 2/
As if it's not enough, the article is followed by the transcript of Putin's infamous "Address concerning the events in Ukraine" that he gave on February 21, 2022. 3/
Dmitry Medvedev has authored a "scholarly" article on the history of Poland's relations with Russia, calling it an "enemy" and threatening it with war.
It's a long (and boring) read, and we have every reason to suspect he isn't the real author. Who wrote it? I know the answer.🧵
Let's look at the footnotes. Medvedev claims to have consulted an issue of the Pravda newspaper from November 25, 1989. He quotes the Polish Prime-minister Tadeusz Mazowiecki here: 2/
A quick search on Google shows that the same quote from the same source was used in another article published in 2020. 3/
“Global support for the war is shrinking,” @TIME says. Indeed, now that “Ukraine fatigue” is everywhere, Russia feels emboldened to carry on with solving the Ukrainian question for good. But what happens if a peace treaty is signed? An op-ed in RIA Novosti explains it all. 🧵
Last June, the RIA Novosti author Viktoriia Nikiforova published an important text, which nearly everyone missed. In it, she argued that peace was in Russia's best interests. The reason? Empire building takes time. 2/
For one thing, Russia has already made significant "territorial gains," which can't be undone. "What is left of Ukraine" will accept whatever deal, she says. 3/
Russia unleashed horror upon the Kharkiv region. Yesterday, it fired an Iskander missile at the village of Hroza, murdering half the villagers (52 people) in a blink of an eye. Today, it launched two missiles at downtown Kharkiv. There's one thing everyone should be aware of: 🧵
Kharkiv was the 5th region of Ukraine that Russia planned to annex one year ago through a sham referendum. It never happened: during the swift Ukrainian counter-offensive last September, almost the entire region was liberated in a matter of days. 2/
It came as a shock to many in Russia, especially after the loud and self-confident assurances that "Russia was there forever." Even bigger shock to them was the flood of videos showing crowds of happy villagers and urban residents greeting the Ukrainian troops with tears. 3/
Since March 2022, German academic relationships with Russian institutions have been suspended. Now the boycott begins to crack. A public German university renews collaboration with a state university in Russia, notorious for its support for the invasion. Read on.🧵
Media outlets in Russia's Karelia are spreading the news that run counter to everything the EU has said and done in response to the Russian invasion. Offenburg University in Germany has offered Petrozavodsk State University to restore their official partnership. 2/
This partnership includes a student exchange program. In September, an unspecified number of students from Petrozavodsk will go to Offenburg for the winter semester 2023/24, where they will receive a monthly scholarship of 700 EUR. 3/