Read on Twitter
Domestic violence isn't a 'gendered issue', and I'm amazed at how much data there is to show this.
Paper after paper, survey after survey; each is slid across the table, to show equal rates of abuse, and each is rejected like a petulant child splitting out their vegetables. Why?
Paper after paper, survey after survey; each is slid across the table, to show equal rates of abuse, and each is rejected like a petulant child splitting out their vegetables. Why?
Straus, Dutton, Gelles, Desmarais, Fiebert… the world’s leading researchers line up to show us the reality of domestic violence, and we wave them away because some sassy mug, garish t shirt, or savage tweet, claims differently.
So can we ignore the 1,700 studies of the PASK?
So can we ignore the 1,700 studies of the PASK?
The data is shocking, but nothing new – we've just ignored it for decades.
So the truth of the domestic violence industry becomes clear. The mission isn't really to protect DV victims, it is to protect a divisive and outdated ideology, and to save face, at the cost of lives.
So the truth of the domestic violence industry becomes clear. The mission isn't really to protect DV victims, it is to protect a divisive and outdated ideology, and to save face, at the cost of lives.
Dozens, hundreds, thousands of studies, each showing gender symmetry, have been ignored, erased or denied for decades; so as to protect the egos, and livelihood of the misinformed, and the malicious.
So how much more evidence do you need?
How much higher must the mountain grow?
So how much more evidence do you need?
How much higher must the mountain grow?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
