Vlad Vexler Profile picture
Dec 18 7 tweets 1 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Putin's war messaging to Russians, and the West's illusions about stopping the war.

Very quick thread. 1/7
At the turn of the year, Putin's message to Russians is:

(1) We are in a forever war with the West, with Russia's survival at stake

(2) There is no war, get on with your lives please

2/7
The first part of Putin's message is 'alternate reality propaganda'; presenting a false picture of reality and claiming it's true.

The second part is post-truth propaganda; saturating the informational environment so as to cast doubt on whether anything is true.

3/7
In my interpretation, Putin's avoidance of a ubiquitous 'forever war' message is a technique to help him move toward a 'forever war'.

The contradictoriness of his messaging should not be taken by us as indicating a lack of conviction.
4/7
The illusion in the West is that Putin will stop under the right circumstances. We just need to wait until those materialise.

In reality, for Putin, any stopping point will be a stopping point on the way to a bigger conflict with the West.

5/7
Russia experts frequently point out that Putin won't stop, and that ignoring this will set us up for a big security crisis ahead.

Yet the form this suggestion takes, implying that the problem is a lack of understanding and a lack of willpower, is itself problematic.

6/7
The main obstacle to Western support for Ukraine is domestic democratic incapacity.

One of the challenges of our age is that tying action to a clear vision of a global order might be more than democracies whose institutions are in crisis can do.

7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vlad Vexler

Vlad Vexler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VladVexler

Oct 13
Dear chronic illness community, I want to talk to you about dance!

I know I know. You are thinking, many chronically ill people are too sick to take a shower or read a book. They can no more dance than go to the moon!

Let me explain.

1/18

#pwME #chronicillness
Yes, chronically ill people usually can't dance.

Moreover, systemic exercise intolerance is a central feature of a condition like myalgic encephalomyelitis. Deterioration from exertion often takes a long time to recover from, and sometimes, can do permanent damage.

2/18
Moreover, many chronically ill people are bedridden and regularly suffer violent symptoms. They live on a quite different planet, where they try to survive by keeping this planet in their gaze. On their planet, there is no dance.

3/18
Read 18 tweets
Oct 3
Understanding #LongCovid needn’t be complex. Quick thread.

Think of it not as ‘struggling to recover from Covid’ but as a syndromic illness triggered by Covid. By implication, a mild Covid infection can trigger life-altering Long Covid in some of the population.

1/10
At this point we can lean on 30 years of scientific literature on ME, formerly called CFS. It teaches us 77 things which apply to #LongCovid. Here are four of them.

2/10
First, like ME, #LongCovid is a serious illness. One study showed ME to be the most disabling of the common diseases we know - inc. cancer, MS, diabetes and so on. This is shocking but true. We are unfortunately seeing a similar picture in people with Long Covid. 3/10 Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 30
It's 1 year since the death of Gorbachev. In his own historical context, he was an example of ethical adequacy in high power.

His project was always doomed - he tried to reform a system that was unreformable. But he was tested by vast historical forces and came through.

1/8 Image
Gorbachev had blood on his hands, but he let the USSR break up without massive violence; he gave his citizens more freedom; he worked with Western leaders to end the Cold War. And he didn't try to exchange departure for security.

2/8 Image
It is a miracle that Gorbachev remained a humanly and ethically compelling man. Remember how much moral ambiguity and dirty hands it takes to rise to the top of the Soviet politburo! Any of Gorbachev's predecessor's would have resorted to massive violence.

3/8 Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 25
Navalny - or rather his Twitter profile - has produced a thread calling Girkin a "political prisoner".

Here are my quick thoughts on why his account has said this, and what we should make of it.

First, what did "Navalny" actually say?

1/7
He said that Girkin has been legitimately sentenced by a Dutch court, but is illegitimately arrested in Russia, making him "a political prisoner".

Acknowledging the Dutch verdict, Navalny adds that an investigation should be conducted in Russia too. Why is he saying this?

2/7
Sure, Girkin has been arrested for political speech. But this intervention is bound to seem strange to Western eyes, even if one looks beyond theatrics on Twitter.

So, what is going on?

3/7
Read 7 tweets
Jul 13
My thoughts on Western commitment to Ukraine, in light of the NATO summit, and the future of Putin's escalation against the West.

A short thread. 0/6
1/ Putin's sense that he can keep Ukraine out of NATO by keeping the war going is reinforced.

Even if Putin loses Crimea (and survives), he won't stop firing on 🇺🇦territory. His conception of regime security equals war & a wide escalation against the West later in the decade.
2/ The West is committed to Ukraine's independence, but not to a Ukrainian victory; Ukraine's full territorial integrity.

The West's support is impressive but hesitant: the tardiness and insufficiency of weapons provided is a product of a lack of strategic clarity.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 8
In my capacity as a moral philosopher -

The Q isn't whether it is just or morally unambiguous for the US to send cluster munitians to Ukraine. The Q is whether it is military necessary - and whether that necessity outweighs all other political considerations.

A thread. 1/12
First, let's look at what the question is not.

The Q is not whether Ukraine should use cluster munitions - it is whether the USA should give Ukraine cluster munitions (Ukraine has already used some).

2/12
The Q is not whether Ukraine would get an immediate military benefit from US cluster munitions - the consensus is that it would.

The Q is not whether there are strong reasons for the USA NOT to give Ukraine cluster munitions - any reasonably arguer must agree there are.

3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(