7 signs that Russia is winning the information war (unfortunately):
1) We still fail to see how essential the fight against disinfo and propaganda by authoritarian regimes is to protect our democracy & security🧵
2)
The never-ending call for negotiations.
There are still people speaking about "negotiations" as if Russian leaders showed any signs of compromise in their path of cultural genocide, deportations, annexations, and subjugation of Ukraine
3)
2014?
One could think that we did our homework after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but no, Russian narratives about Maidan, Crimea, and Donbas are still widespread, and we failed to educate people. It's easy for Russian propaganda to create confusion about the past...
4) We do not listen
We still do not monitor the genocidal and imperialistic rhetoric of Russian domestic propaganda on a daily basis; many people are still not even aware of what propagandists and politicians say there.
5)
"Useful idiots" are welcome
We still welcome people who have no clue about Eastern Europe but are apologists for the Kremlin's actions to comment about the situation. Additionally, we failed to debunk them; often, they can spread their narratives without any resistance
6.1 )
No awareness for the terror of the occupation regime
Many people think that if the weapons were to remain silent, the suffering would end. They are not aware of the terror under Russian occupation – deportations, rape, re-education, torture, and killings.
6.2)
This makes it easier to advocate for an "immediate ceasefire", "end of weapons delivery" to "end the suffering." Of course, this does not help the people in the occupied areas who would be trapped under Russian occupation.
7)
Demonization of Ukraine succeeded
It is not only about 'bothsidesism'; in many cases, people seem to completely blame Ukraine and/or the West for the war. The lack of education about Ukraine collides with the huge amount of Russian narratives, which we find everywhere
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Im Dezember 2013 bin ich in Kyiv gewesen, die ganze Stadt voller Europaflaggen. Im März 2014 kam ich zurück, die Leute wollten den Maidan nicht räumen, obwohl Yanukovich weg war: "wir wollen sichergehen, dass unser Weg nach Europa führt".
Tausende sind steither dafür gestorben🧵
Als ich nach Wien zurückgekommen war, schockierte mich die Ignoranz von Politik und Gesellschaft. Nicht nur war kaum Solidarität mit der Ukraine vorhanden, man glaubte sogar die russischen Narrative. Nicht einmal in der "pro EU" Szene interessierte man sich wirklich dafür.
Die notwendigen Reformen sind unbestritten, nicht nur im Sinne der EU, sondern auch im Sinne der Ukraine. Aber jetzt, ein Land, welches für den Wunsch sich nach Europa zu orientieren so viel durchmachen musste, weil der autokratische Nachbar das verhindern will zu blockieren...no
"Russian borders end nowhere" poster on the border with Estonia, threats against Latvia, Finland, ideas about a new Austria-Hungary under "Russian protection"...
Why do those who consistently believe in Russian claims remain so silent about these threats?🧵
This is actually nothing new: We heard it before the full-scale invasion and afterwards. Russia does not accept the territorial integrity and independence of its neighbors and beyond.
So-called analysts, Duma politicians, and propagandists are free to spread their imperialistic dreams on state propaganda TV. Did we listen to it? Did we react? No, we did not. We decided to ignore it.
The problem with "bothsidesism" or Russian propaganda "between the lines" is that it can sound so "reasonable" or "ethical" that it quite often spreads into less radical communities and can even become mainstream
I wanna highlight some notorious phrases that are very common⬇️🧵
"It takes two to make a war."
Yes, of course, but what do we learn from this statement? Does it imply that the attacker and defender are equally responsible? Or does it suggest that the defender should submit to the attacker, even if it means additional death, torture, rape...
When this phrase is used, none of the consequences for civilians that are accompanied by surrendering are mentioned. It falsely implies that the suffering will end when there are no shots fired on the battlefield. Occupation or the risk of further aggression is overlooked.
Democracy is under attrack and the most efficiant weapons against our societies are disinformation & propaganda
The greatest trick autocrats and extremists pulled was to make us believe that democracy is not worth defending, let's check how they do it🧵
Welcome to the dictators' and extremists' playbook. What strategies to follow to confuse Western audiences and make them follow your agenda? Don't worry; it's easier than you may think.
Let's take a look at the basics, shall we?
"First lesson of the autocrats' playbook: Show that democratic societies are basically 'in decay' and present a completely whitewashed version of their regime, putting as much blame on the 'collective West' as possible.
The Kremlin does it, but so do other autocratic regimes.
Propaganda works better when delivered 'between the lines,' not subtly, and not as easily detectable as the 'in your face' kind of radical rhetoric.
Let's go on a trip to the land of whataboutism, bothsidesism, and 'we should not forget what happened before'⬇️
If I had a dime for every time I heard after February 2022, 'What about the invasion of Iraq?'...
In some cases, whataboutism is not even connected to events that actually happened but blatant disinfo, such as 'What about the genocide of Russians in Donbas by Ukraine?'"
Then we have "apples with oranges" whataboutism. "What about the Cuba crisis? Would we have allowed the Soviets to place their rockets there?" Well, I don't remember that it was planned to station nuclear rockets in Ukraine, and btw, there are none in the Baltic countries, etc.