Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
@ExposingNV
Dec 22, 2023 • 17 tweets • 6 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
🧵🧵
1. Well, the courts are now CLOSED for 2023!
2024 is looking to be a big year in the courts for the Freedom Movement. We're expecting a few judgments/decisions and a number of cases to progress. Here is a list of freedom movement & other cases of interest:
2. Anti-lockdown activist mentioned the other day that one of her priorities for 2024 is court cases - "both offensive & defensive" !!

On the defensive side, she's being prosecuted by Consumer Affairs Victoria for alleged unlawful fundraising.
Image
Image
3. Monica is pleading not guilty to the charges. Her next court date is 22nd January (a mention).
4. On the "offensive side", Monica is suing Victoria Police for alleged unlawful arrest over this incident:
5. After numerous failures to comply w/ court deadlines including vacating the original trial date, it appears Monica *may* be applying to discontinue the proceedings.

A hearing is listed for 23 Jan to hear the application.
6. Still on the "offensive side", Monica has announced she's planning on suing Brett Sutton for the 21 days she spent in custody.

Considering she ELECTED to spend the time in custody, this will certainly be an interesting case...
7. The NSW Law Society is seeking disciplinary orders against anti-mandate lawyer Nathan Buckley.

Nathan tried to stop the case progressing but was unsuccessful. The parties return to NCAT in February for a case management hearing. Image
8. Despite the Voice referendum not succeeding, suspended doctor Billy Bay is still trying to challenge its validity!

In 2023 the High Court dismissed his challenge to the Voice as an "abuse of process". He's now trying to appeal that decision... Image
9. The other suspended doctor, Mark Hobart, recently lost his appeal against the Medical Board's decision to suspend his registration. He's now filed an application for special leave to appeal in the High Court.

Like Billy, he loves a High Court challenge! Image
10. Clive Palmer reckons he's going to sue the former chair of ASIC
Image
Image
11. Lawyers behind 2 failed COVID vax challenges took Pfizer & Moderna to court, arguing their vaccines constituted GMOs.

Pfizer & Moderna applied to have the case summarily dismissed on grounds it had no prospects of success.

We're currently awaiting judgment... Image
12. 500+ ppl are part of a COVID vax injury class action against the Cth Govt. They say the decision to approve the vaccine constitutes negligence & malfeasance.

The Govt intends to apply for the case to be dismissed on grounds it's hopeless w/ no prospects of success.
Image
Image
13. Former sports presenter Warren Tredrea is suing Channel 9, claiming the network unfairly dismissed him b/c he refused to get the COVID vaccine.

After a lengthy hearing, the court has reserved its decision. Currently awaiting judgment. Image
14. Then there's suspended lawyer Serene Teffaha's class action against the Victorian Legal Services Board and the Commonwealth Bank...

#WillNeverHappen Image
15. And disendorsed OneNation candidate Rebecca Lloyd's class action against ASIC over their Director ID laws!

16. Outside the freedom movement, there are a few interesting cases too.

Moira Deeming is suing John Pesutto for defamation for allegedly calling her a Nazi sympathiser

You can read her Statement of Claim here:
Image
17. And of course, there's Bruce Lehrmann's defamation lawsuit against the Channel 10 and Lisa Wilkinson.

Judgment expected early 20204

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️

Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExposingNV

Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Sep 7
🧵

1. Bike Boy’s private criminal prosecution of Daniel Andrews will go nowhere

Allow me to explain… Image
2. For your continued education, the Victorian legislation that delegates the plenary power of the Crown (the Victorian Governer General to be exact) to the Victorian Director of Public prosecutions is the Public Prosecutions Act 1994 (Vic)
3. Section 22(1) (a) of the Act gives the DPP, and ONLY the DPP, the absolute authority to institute (initially charge), prepare and conduct indictable offences Image
Read 9 tweets
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Aug 15
🧵

1. Bec Freedom, who’s one of the organisers behind the 31 August “anti immigration” rally claims she’s not a racist & that any recordings of her making statements to the contrary have been taken out of context

Let’s see if Bec’s claims stack up!
2. Here’s Bec sharing the tweet of a neo-Nazi, promoting her rally on 31 August Image
Image
3. I asked Bec why she was re-tweeting the post of a neo Nazi and she replied with this: Image
Read 8 tweets
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Jul 1
1. A Pauline Hanson fan’s hope for a High Court showdown has ended before it even began!

The self represented litigant tried (& failed) to get the High Court to declare 18C invalid & overturn Pauline Hanson’s Federal Court loss

🧵
2. Heidi Ward filed a writ naming the Cth, Federal Court & Senator Mehreen Faruqi as defendants. She wanted to overturn decision in Faruqi v Hanson, declare s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act invalid & have Faruqi ruled ineligible to sit in Parliament Image
3. Because her proposed writ was so obviously lacking in legal basis, she needed the High Court’s permission just to file it!

(This only happens when an application on its face is lacking in merit!) Image
Read 9 tweets
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Dec 20, 2024
🧵1. Earlier this year, conservative US commentator Candace Owens was denied a visa to Australia on grounds she has “capacity to incite discord”

She’s now challenging that decision in the High Court of Australia!

In this thread I explain what her case is all about! Image
2. This case is very different to Djokovic’s legal challenge over the Minister for Home Affairs’ decision to deny him a visa. In that case, Djokovic essentially challenged the WAY the Minister made his decision to deny him a visa
3. HERE, Candace is challenging the LEGISLATION that gives the Minister the power to deny her a visa!
Read 16 tweets
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Dec 13, 2024
🧵
1. The no longer suspended doctor Bay vs AHPRA & the Medical Board.

In this thread, I summarise the court’s decision: why Bai is no longer suspended, why his Constitutional argument failed, and what the possible future brings for Dr Bay Image
2. This case was an application for “judicial review” by Dr Bay. He applied to the QLD Supreme Court for a review of the following 2 decisions of the Medical Board: the decision to suspend him & the decision to investigate his conduct
3. What is judicial review? It’s the power of a Court to review decisions of government agencies or public bodies. The role of the Court is to determine if the decision was properly made – the focus is on the law & how the decision was made, not the MERITS of the decision
Read 29 tweets
Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture
Dec 11, 2024
🧵
1. What happens when lawyers behind a failed lawsuit against Pfizer & Moderna accuse the presiding judge of bias because the judge happened to have a science degree & a cousin who once supported medical research?

A judicial smackdown of course! Image
2. Background to this drama:

Controversial doctor Julian Fidge decided to sue Pfizer & Moderna, claiming their COVID vaccines were genetically modified organisms & illegally unlicensed under the Gene Technology Act
3. Justice Rofe of the Federal Court dismissed the case summarily, on the basis that Fidge lacked “standing” to bring the proceedings. Fidge used the same lawyers who’d once represented the Australian Vaccination-risks Network (cont)
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(