🧵 THREAD: Surprise, Surprise - Soros Bucks Are Behind Colorado Ruling to Remove Trump from the Ballot
Let's take a closer look at the Trump team's statement:
“Unsurprisingly, the all-Democrat appointed Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, supporting a Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme to interfere in an election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden by removing President Trump’s name from the ballot and eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice. Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November. The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight, and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision. We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.”
Continue reading in the thread below ⬇️
#2 - The Trump campaign referenced two Soros-funded left-wing groups behind this ruling: the so-called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, as well as another group called Free Speech for People.
#3 - However, the funding of those nonprofits is quite jarring:
“[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Free Speech for People] are backed by the Democrat-affiliated ActBlue organization, which enabled fundraising for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. Inevitably, both also turn out to have received money from Open Society Foundations, the jewel in the crown of George Soros’ multi-billion Open Society Foundations organization.”
#4 -“And they’re now using a law originally intended to exclude Confederate rebels from holding office to instead bar Americans from being able to vote for President Trump,” remarked @FactsMatterRB.
#5 - Balmakov’s Earlier Statements Summarize the Insanity of the Situation Succinctly:
“You know that weird, weird feeling when election day finally arrives, you go to your local polling place, only to find that the guy you wanted to vote for has been entirely removed from the ballot?
“And he was removed from that ballot by four local judges from the opposition political party.
“And so, you say, okay, well, that’s weird. Let me just write his name in. However, those same judges, they instructed the local election officials [not to] count any write-in votes for that particular candidate.
“Now, if all this sounds to you like an election somewhere in Russia, in Brazil, or maybe Venezuela, well, you [would] be wrong. This is an election taking place over in Colorado.”
@FactsMatterRB #6 - The entire Facts Matter episode with Roman Balmakov is available via the video below:
I never imagined that I would be reporting on the news every day. It's been a wild ride. Thank you for your support.
Please help me continue to upend the narrative by hitting the bell 🔔 on my profile page (@VigilantFox) for real-time updates on what the media isn't telling you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come to [him], and they’d bring [him] video tapes of their [formerly healthy] children. And they’re all about the age of [Scarborough’s] son or younger. Something happened in 1989!”
Twenty years later, it’s hard to ignore that the mainstream media never airs segments like this anymore.
Did the evidence change... or something else? 🧵
Most people have absolutely no idea how much public-relations machinery shapes what they believe about health.
PR campaigns don’t just change opinions, they change language in the process.
And when language changes, memories and ideas seem to disappear—including things we used to openly acknowledge, like vaccine-induced brain inflammation and neurological injury.
Today, those concepts barely exist in public vocabulary, but just decades ago they were recognized everywhere.
The shift happens slowly. That’s how the tactic is so successful. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.
For example, take a look at this 1983 debate that took place on the largest talk show in America. A conversation like this would never, ever happen on TV today.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.
ACIP just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation.
For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.
Here are the three voting members who still insist every child needs a hepatitis B shot at birth. Remember their names. 🧵
Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.
Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak.
Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”
Video: @Holden_Culotta
The decision to end the universal hepatitis B vaccination recommendation is a huge deal because the three-shot series is required for public school attendance in nearly every state, and most states base their mandates directly on ACIP recommendations.
Today’s decision instantly places the decades-old school requirement on unstable ground.
The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public school in virtually every state.
Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed on babies their first day of life?
Doctors don’t have a valid answer. If you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.
Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby, as long as the mother is negative. However, the US still recommends that every child be injected on the first day of life.
Make it make sense.
Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.
But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level?
Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you. 🧵
The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time.
At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.
Moreover, if you look at the 20–24 (light blue) and 15–19 (orange) age groups, you’ll notice that the rates of acute hepatitis B were falling long before the vaccination could ever be given credit, because the vaccine would not have an impact on 20–24-year-olds until around 2011–2012, or until 2006–2007 for 15–19-year-olds, Dr. Nevison noted.
Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China?
It sounds far too dark, but it’s true.
Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time.
But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner.
China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story.
And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America?
This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵
Most people think organ donation is a simple act of generosity. Check the box. Save a life. End of story.
But behind the scenes, a series of federal investigations has exposed something far more disturbing. And there’s no generosity in sight.
The system meant to protect those barely clinging to life is failing—and in some cases, it’s a catastrophic failure.
Take Jenny’s story for example. Jenny was declared brain dead when she wasn’t at all. Terrifyingly, she was stuck inside her body, fully aware of everything that was happening—and being said—around her.
Including a doctor telling med students that her husband was “unreasonable” for not signing her organs—and her life—away.
Thankfully he didn’t or Jenny wouldn’t be here today to share her story.
What is brain death? There is no standard.
The ethical line between life and death is not where you think it is.
Modern medicine has slowly reshaped how we think—and feel—about death.
Tools like CPR, ventilators, and organ transplantation have created the belief that death is negotiable—something to be delayed, managed, or “conquered.”
That belief built enormous trust. And with that trust came enormous profit.
Organ transplants can cost a staggering $446,000–$1.9 million each. In the US, healthcare now consumes 17.6% of the economy.
Where scarcity meets profit, exploitation always follows.
How many times have you heard someone say: “I got the flu shot, and I still got the flu anyway”?
Bill Maher says he once got the flu shot and “immediately” came down with the flu.
Lara Trump’s mother had an even worse experience. As a nurse, she got the flu shot every year—and “every time [she’d] ever gotten it, [she’d] get the flu immediately after it.”
Now, she doesn’t get it anymore.
Why do so many people get sick after the flu shot?
This thread explores why that happens—and what really happens inside the body right after a vaccine. 🧵
For decades, vaccines have been marketed as “safe and effective.”
No questions. Nothing else to consider. Safe and effective. Full stop.
But a mountain of buried medical research and endless reports from the vaccine-injured show a very different pattern—one that has repeated for more than a century.
In disease after disease, across multiple countries and multiple eras, vaccines have a weird habit of triggering or worsening the very illnesses they are supposed to be preventing.
Strange.
This occurrence isn’t fringe. It’s documented, replicated, and historically well known.
But millions of people—doctors, teachers, parents, friends—pretend it isn’t.
And even when they do offer a protective effect for some disease, they can leave your immune system weakened and vulnerable to other infections that can end up killing you. Just look at what happened in Guinea-Bissau.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vacci…