🧵 THREAD: Surprise, Surprise - Soros Bucks Are Behind Colorado Ruling to Remove Trump from the Ballot
Let's take a closer look at the Trump team's statement:
“Unsurprisingly, the all-Democrat appointed Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, supporting a Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme to interfere in an election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden by removing President Trump’s name from the ballot and eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice. Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November. The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight, and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision. We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.”
Continue reading in the thread below ⬇️
#2 - The Trump campaign referenced two Soros-funded left-wing groups behind this ruling: the so-called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, as well as another group called Free Speech for People.
#3 - However, the funding of those nonprofits is quite jarring:
“[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Free Speech for People] are backed by the Democrat-affiliated ActBlue organization, which enabled fundraising for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. Inevitably, both also turn out to have received money from Open Society Foundations, the jewel in the crown of George Soros’ multi-billion Open Society Foundations organization.”
#4 -“And they’re now using a law originally intended to exclude Confederate rebels from holding office to instead bar Americans from being able to vote for President Trump,” remarked @FactsMatterRB.
#5 - Balmakov’s Earlier Statements Summarize the Insanity of the Situation Succinctly:
“You know that weird, weird feeling when election day finally arrives, you go to your local polling place, only to find that the guy you wanted to vote for has been entirely removed from the ballot?
“And he was removed from that ballot by four local judges from the opposition political party.
“And so, you say, okay, well, that’s weird. Let me just write his name in. However, those same judges, they instructed the local election officials [not to] count any write-in votes for that particular candidate.
“Now, if all this sounds to you like an election somewhere in Russia, in Brazil, or maybe Venezuela, well, you [would] be wrong. This is an election taking place over in Colorado.”
@FactsMatterRB #6 - The entire Facts Matter episode with Roman Balmakov is available via the video below:
I never imagined that I would be reporting on the news every day. It's been a wild ride. Thank you for your support.
Please help me continue to upend the narrative by hitting the bell 🔔 on my profile page (@VigilantFox) for real-time updates on what the media isn't telling you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.
“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”
Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.
So, what happened?
Screens.
Dr. Jared Horvath explained:
“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”
“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”
“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”
But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.
They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty. 🧵
This isn’t a glitch.
Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.
So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.
Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.
This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.
Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.
We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”
Something unprecedented and highly concerning is happening to children’s brains.
Toddlers aren’t just watching screens—they’re being neurologically conditioned by them.
Rapid cuts, flashing colors, constant novelty.
And none of it is by accident. It is all by design.
What looks like “kid’s content” is often dopamine engineering aimed at maximizing engagement, not healthy development, no matter the damage it does.
A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering.
Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate?
But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
Have you ever heard the Declaration of Independence read out loud?
You should. It’s the greatest break-up letter ever written.
At just 33 years old, Thomas Jefferson, with cold moral clarity, told the British government to pound sand:
“Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], it is the Right of the People to alter or to ABOLISH it.”
The power of that line isn’t just what it says. It’s how it’s said.
Jefferson wasn’t writing from a place of outrage. He was transmitting conviction — moral clarity delivered from a steady frame of mind.
It’s said Jefferson revised the Declaration of Independence with the help of Franklin and Adams dozens of times before it was finalized.
And that deliberate, cutting language paired with emotional steadiness is precisely why the words still land nearly 250 years later. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below. 👇
“WOW!” Joe Rogan’s brain nearly exploded when Dr. Matthew Walker explained what just a one-hour difference in sleep can do.
When we spring forward for daylight savings time, “we see a subsequent 24% INCREASE in heart attacks.”
But this is the part that blew Rogan’s mind:
“In the fall, in the autumn, when we gain an hour of sleep, there’s a 21% decrease in heart attacks. So it’s bidirectional.”
“Wow!” Rogan said, stunned.
“That’s how fragile and vulnerable your body is to even just the smallest perturbation of sleep,” Dr. Walker explained.
And if losing or gaining just one hour can swing heart attack risk that dramatically, imagine what years of bad sleep are doing to your body. 🧵
Sleep deprivation isn’t just making people tired—it’s locking trauma into the nervous system and fueling chronic disease.
When sleep breaks down, emotional injuries don’t heal.
If you don’t get real restorative sleep, your brain can’t process emotional injury, your immune system can’t reset, and your body stays stuck in perpetual stress mode.
That’s not just fatigue—that’s biological harm.
Sleep isn’t a luxury. It’s a physiological necessity for emotional and nervous system healing—and when it’s disrupted, trauma doesn’t fade, it lives in the body.
So why is no one talking about the connection between trauma, sleep, and long-term health?
Trauma isn’t just something that happened to us “in the past.” It can shape our lives every single day.
Trauma is a biological injury that can lodge in the nervous system, quietly reshaping behavior, health, and perception for decades.
It affects us in the past and present and will continue to affect us in the future if not released.
Even small childhood experiences—if left unresolved—can ripple outward into lifelong patterns most people never connect back to the original cause.
Trauma isn’t just the big, obviously traumatic things.
REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history.
The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison.
It gets worse.
The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed.
The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them.
And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do.
If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow?
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Meanwhile in the UK, students are being monitored for thought crimes through a government-funded video game at schools.
Kids as young as 11 could be flagged as potential terrorists simply for questioning mass migration.
The game, Pathways, puts students in control of a white character navigating so-called moral dilemmas. If they express the "wrong" opinion, share the “wrong” video, or attend a protest defending British values, their extremism meter climbs.
The penalty? Counseling for ideological thoughts or a referral to PREVENT—Britain’s official counterterrorism program.
Even researching immigration statistics is treated as suspicious. If a student dares to “look into it more,” the game warns: you’re being radicalized.
Looking up the truth is now a red flag.
This isn’t education. It’s psychological conditioning—pressuring children to stay silent, conform, and report their peers for independent thought.
Peter Navarro told Fauci to his face that he had “blood on his hands” for keeping hydroxychloroquine from the American people.
Navarro walked into the Situation Room with a huge stack of papers, saying hydroxychloroquine worked. The one person who helped Fauci escape Navarro was Vice President Mike Pence, who told him to “take this outside.”
This is a story that comes from Dr. Fauci himself.
He says he never wanted to contradict President Trump’s COVID messaging, but felt compelled to do so out of a responsibility to “tell the truth.”
For people like Fauci, “telling the truth” doesn’t mean transparency. It follows a very different logic, and once you see it, everything about COVID suddenly makes sense. 🧵
Something dangerous has happened to science.
It didn’t happen overnight, and it didn’t happen by accident.
Science, once a method for discovering truth through open debate and constant challenge, has been replaced by something else entirely: scientism.
And unlike science, scientism does not tolerate dissent.
Anthony Fauci not only promoted scientism, he took it to an extreme. In the interview below, he actually argued that he is “the science.”
And if you don’t agree? You’re anti-science. And dangerous.
Scientism is not skepticism, rigor, or evidence-based reasoning.
Scientism is not science.
It is the elevation of credentialed authority over inquiry itself.
Instead of asking whether claims are correct, scientism asks who is allowed to speak.
And once that shift occurs, truth is no longer discovered—it is declared.