Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

Dec 24, 2023 • 13 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

The scam level of Natural Asset Companies is extremely difficult to get your head around, and the SEC is deciding on this demonic creation—supported by WEF, facilitating UN agendas, enriching the oligarchs, pushed by Biden—on Jan 2, when people haven't been paying attention. 🧵

Natural Asset Companies allow for the privatization, commodification, and total control of natural assets, including forests, water, minerals, and so on, and are geared to operationalize their value in new ways, notably "sustainable management," i.e., death cult evil.

They also allow for the ability under the heading of "sustainable management" to manufacture a fake water crisis that, in practice, is totally real and a pathway to requiring full digital ID to access water "sustainably," just like the WEF threatened recently. They're the path.

They also have the capacity to make activities like farming extremely expensive, which can squeeze out most farmers, forcing them to sell their farms for pennies on the dollar to these huge "stakeholder" entities (Bill Gates?) who have the capacity to "manage" it correctly.

Whole rafts of the Leftist agenda fly into action off Natural Asset Companies.

For example, normally, creating something like 15-minute cities and enforcing degrowth would be very costly: you have to buy up all the rural land/mines with "your own" money, like $100s of trillions.

Further, coercing people to move into cities can be expensive too and might get violent. These are just a few major stumbling blocks for the Masters of the Universe without a far more powerful scam even than ESG control (corporate cartel allied with the state).

What they can do instead is set up system (NACs) where they buy up farmland from desperate sellers and natural resources with other people's money (pension funds, university endowments) and then sue anyone who tries to use those resources as violations of your new "property."

Worst, they can use this new system (NACs) to claim this whole scam is all "capitalism." As for money, they can leverage NAC management to leverage farmers, miners, people, etc., into desperation selling by making it prohibitively expensive to use your land.

Because of collusion ("public-private" model), if private fortunes (like Gates) and leveraged pension and retirement money (that is, the ESG management structure for passive investment capital) isn't enough, the IMF and Fed will be there to assist. The NAC legals make it work.

The Biden Administration created the legals here in the US on the back of structures built at the NYSE with the Rockefeller Foundation driving it, and they are trying to slip it under the radar. Public comments got extended under protest but only to January 2, right after Xmas.

This is a scale of evil possibly unprecedented in world history, with all its foundations in Marx's ramblings (Communism was always a new feudalism with the Social Gnostics—Soviets, stakeholders, whatever—on top, save the Lords and Ladies financing them).

Learn more about Natural Asset Companies here:
wsj.com/articles/biden…

https://twitter.com/Comfynumb15/status/1738775099778469957

Leave comments for the SEC here:

https://twitter.com/Comfynumb15/status/1738775099778469957

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ConceptualJames

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

May 8

Do you think this right-wing influencer is Woke Right?

This is a thread of new polls revisiting the same questions and same personalities from last August, so scroll down and RT the top post.

1) Tucker Carlson

2) Ben Shapiro

3) Candace Owens

Read 35 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Dec 7, 2025

From my Woke Encyclopedia, an explanation of the "friend-enemy distinction" of Carl Schmitt, which is the Woke political logic. Link at the end!🧵

(1/13) The friend-enemy distinction refers to the cornerstone object of the political and judicial philosophy of a German theorist named Carl Schmitt, who wrote a number of works of right-wing political philosophy and thought before becoming such an enthusiastic Nazi in 1933, just after Adolf Hitler took power, that he earned the informal title “the Crown Jurist of the Third Reich.”

Though most of his significant political thinking was done both before and after he was a Nazi, during the years when he was a part of Hitler’s National Socialist movement and Party, he contributed strongly to the legal theory that justified the Nazi “total state,” including writing the 1933 piece that gets rendered in English as “The Legal Basis for the Total State,” which is significantly based upon the friend-enemy distinction.

Friend-enemy distinction:

(2/13) Schmitt’s thought is primarily of interest on the Woke Right, where he is a favored thinker and model political mind. He is vigorously forwarded for a handful of his political concepts, perhaps most visibly his “friend-enemy distinction” as the essential criterion of what makes politics political. This idea is first presented and developed in full detail in his 1927/32 book The Concept of the Political.

Friend-enemy distinction:

(3/13) For Schmitt, what makes the politics political is the distinction between (public) friend and (public) enemy, where enemies are defined as those who are interested in destroying one’s way of life and friends are defined as those who are willing to band together in its defense.

Schmitt specifically compares the essential nature of this distinction in politics to the distinction between good and evil in morality, beautiful and ugly in aesthetics, and profitable versus non-profitable in economics.

That is, politics is only political to the degree that it recognizes the possibility of factions that exist in mutual enmity underwritten by the potentially existential threat of violence. Of course, that means that Schmitt believes the essential criterion of politics is war, which he reveals also in part by making his point by completing the identity contained in von Clausewitz’s famous remark that “war is politics by other means.”

Read 13 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Nov 7, 2025

All radical movements find themselves in a pinch: they can only really advance when people don't know their true intentions, but they can only really advance by going public with what they're doing. It's an intrinsic dilemma that only rare figures in rare circumstances can win.

Mamdani is a good example of a rare figure (extremely good at presenting himself disingenuously while looking real) in rare circumstances (terrible primary opponent, then running against a terrible combination of Cuomo/Sliwa, then still not winning by huge margins).

The primary reason NYC got Mamdani isn't something to do with the electorate, the climate, or anything else. Mamdani, with tons of weird money, ran a very strong campaign (rare figure) in very weird circumstances, most of which were candidate-specific, not conditional.

Read 9 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Sep 25, 2025

The United Nations is a lot weirder than you think. A short thread of podcasts about it.
newdiscourses.com/2024/04/occult…

Like, it's really weird.
newdiscourses.com/2024/06/the-gl…

It's also evil.
newdiscourses.com/2023/07/exposi…

Read 10 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Jul 3, 2025

Fun fact: If you had a time machine and could go back in time to this day in 2019 but couldn't take any physical evidence with you, you could not convince almost anyone to take the Woke Left threat seriously and would get mocked and yelled at for trying, even by friends.

Your left-leaning friends (if you have any) would make fun of you for not getting it. Your right-leaning friends would laugh at you for making a mountain out of a molehill. No one really understood there was a serious problem with the Woke Left until after summer 2020.

The reason I know this is because I was there and doing this full time already by that point in my life.

Read 5 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Jun 26, 2025

Introducing to you two of the "intellectual" Woke Right's favorite contemporary thinkers: Patrick Deneen (left) and R.R. Reno. Here, they demonstrate their inability to see what is plainly in front of them—a Marxist insurgency through Leftist elitist capture—because of their preference for theories of cultural rot and decay.

These kinds of theories about why we are where we are aren't just dangerous misdiagnosed; they're also self-flattering humblebrags, saying in effect, "things got bad because everyone went to shit except people like us who are better than that." Typical Woke virtue signaling except in "modest" conservative form.