On this Christmas, a look at collapsing fertility and the fall of the Roman Empire, how early Christians had higher numbers of surviving children, and how the sect of Christianity grew to inherit the Roman world.
And parallels to the world of today!🧵, please share!
Of all the explanations for the fall of the Roman Empire, low fertility may be the most compelling reason.
We know Rome's population collapsed. But this wasn't a sudden thing due to sacking but was continuous over a number of centuries as this chart by @daveg shows. (2/12)
And our best evidence is that low fertility is the cause. Fertility among elite women was less than two births per woman, while replacement fertility (due to high child mortality) was likely above six. (3/12)
There is evidence that ancient Romans practiced birth control extensively.
Notably, surviving writings of Soranus of Ephesus document a range of ways that women could prevent or terminate pregnancy.
Infanticide was common. (4/12)
The problem of low birthrates was widely noted at the time, A.M. Devine writes, and the repeated passing of laws aimed at raising low Roman birthrates provides strong support that this was a major and long-running crisis. (5/12)
As the Roman world faced continuous decline, there was a growing group that had very different views around children. In the young Christian movement, children were prized and elevated. Infanticide was rejected. (6/12)
Writing in The Week, P. E. Gobry (@pegobry_en) explains the dramatic cultural differences between the new religion and the old in attitudes toward children and family.
Historian Rodney Stark argues that this conferred a huge demographic advantage to the young faith. (7/12)
Christianity was not the cause of Rome's decline. Rome was collapsing due to problems with low birthrates that had been ongoing for centuries.
Christians were a remnant of higher fertility and higher child survival in a world of where children weren't sufficiently valued. (8/12)
Economist @GuthmannR explains the civilizational life cycle where advancement leads to control of fertility and ultimately population collapse, a pattern that that has eerie parallels with the world of today. (9/12)
As @BirthGauge carefully documents, fertility rates have dramatically collapsed throughout the developed world.
Meanwhile, as with Ancient Rome, Christians and other faith groups are bucking the trend of fertility collapse. Charts by @lymanstoneky and @ryanburge show this. (10/12)
Professor @epkaufm's 2010 book, "Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?" looks prescient. Thinkers from @robinhanson to @SimoneHCollins share this thesis.
If broader civilization declines due to fertility collapse, leaving a religious remnant, it won't be the first time! (11/12)
Will our trajectory be like that of Ancient Rome, or will we find a way to reverse falling fertility broadly across society? (12/12)
Follow and repost this account @MoreBirths for ideas on raising fertility rates. The pinned thread and highlights tab are recommended!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A new map shows the last time each country in Europe reached replacement fertility.
Most western European countries, including the UK, France, Germany and Italy haven't had replacement fertility in more than 50 years.
This is the main reason for Europe's stagnation. 🧵.
This map shows the sobering fact that once a country falls below replacement, it almost never bounces back.
Eastern Europe did not fall below replacement until the 1980s but has had exceptionally low fertility over the past 25 years. 2/4
The Americas have had healthy fertility until much more recently. The United States had replacement fertility as recently as 2007 and low birthrates are a recent problem in most of the hemisphere.
That is a big part of why the Americas have outperformed Europe economically. 3/4
A recent study found that giving men a pay raise led them to have more children, while giving women a pay raise led them to have fewer children. 🧵.
For women, the effect of a pay raise was significantly reduced future fertility. A pay increase at 25 was associated with a large decrease in fertility at age 30, regardless of the skill level.
For men, a pay increase was associated with persistently higher fertility. 2/4
Why? The authors argue that "the substitution effect between children and labor supply is dominating for women while the income effect is dominating for men."
Since childcare falls more on women, the competition between work and family is greater for women than for men. 3/4
A newly published paper found pronatal policies only worked when supported by culture.
"Maternity benefits increased fertility only among women who grew up in religious families" in the Baltics.
This could explain why many pronatal policies have not boosted fertility more. 🧵.
In 1982, there was a big expansion in child benefits in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania including maternity leave wage benefits, a cash payment for birth and 18 months of job protection.
Five East European countries with comparable economic systems did not get the benefits. 2/5
The study found, "among women who grew up in religious households, fertility went up by a statistically significant 5.7 percentage points representing a 46.3% increase."
Meanwhile, there was "no change in fertility among women who did not grow up in religious households." 3/5
A new study finds that work-from-home raises fertility more than any conventional family policy.
"Estimated lifetime fertility is greater by 0.32 children per woman when both partners WFH one or more days per week as compared to the case where neither does." 🧵.
In this chart, a large effect is clearly seen, with fertility higher when either partner has some work-from-home and highest when both do.
The authors say this is not due to selection because fertility rose among those that unexpectedly got WFH, compared to those that didn't.
Raising the work-from-home share of either partner by seven percent raised the one-year fertility by a similar amount, which means that families that have WFH have considerably higher fertility on average.
On this Christmas, we can reflect how Christianity was able to grow out of the ashes of collapsing Rome.
Scott Alexander reviews Rodney Stark's The Rise of Christianity and describes how the new faith won out by valuing women and children.
Important 🧵!
Much like our world today, Pagan Rome faced terrible birthrates.
Sex-selective infanticide was the norm. Women were not valued and many men just wanted to stay single.
It got so bad that Roman General Macedonicus proposed forcing people to marry! 2/7
When schemes to make marriage mandatory failed, Augustus tried taxing the unmarried and childless.
Alexander writes, "Formal and informal social pressure eventually convinced most Roman men to take wives, but no amount of love or money could make them have children." 3/7