On this Christmas, a look at collapsing fertility and the fall of the Roman Empire, how early Christians had higher numbers of surviving children, and how the sect of Christianity grew to inherit the Roman world.
And parallels to the world of today!🧵, please share!
Of all the explanations for the fall of the Roman Empire, low fertility may be the most compelling reason.
We know Rome's population collapsed. But this wasn't a sudden thing due to sacking but was continuous over a number of centuries as this chart by @daveg shows. (2/12)
And our best evidence is that low fertility is the cause. Fertility among elite women was less than two births per woman, while replacement fertility (due to high child mortality) was likely above six. (3/12)
There is evidence that ancient Romans practiced birth control extensively.
Notably, surviving writings of Soranus of Ephesus document a range of ways that women could prevent or terminate pregnancy.
Infanticide was common. (4/12)
The problem of low birthrates was widely noted at the time, A.M. Devine writes, and the repeated passing of laws aimed at raising low Roman birthrates provides strong support that this was a major and long-running crisis. (5/12)
As the Roman world faced continuous decline, there was a growing group that had very different views around children. In the young Christian movement, children were prized and elevated. Infanticide was rejected. (6/12)
Writing in The Week, P. E. Gobry (@pegobry_en) explains the dramatic cultural differences between the new religion and the old in attitudes toward children and family.
Historian Rodney Stark argues that this conferred a huge demographic advantage to the young faith. (7/12)
Christianity was not the cause of Rome's decline. Rome was collapsing due to problems with low birthrates that had been ongoing for centuries.
Christians were a remnant of higher fertility and higher child survival in a world of where children weren't sufficiently valued. (8/12)
Economist @GuthmannR explains the civilizational life cycle where advancement leads to control of fertility and ultimately population collapse, a pattern that that has eerie parallels with the world of today. (9/12)
As @BirthGauge carefully documents, fertility rates have dramatically collapsed throughout the developed world.
Meanwhile, as with Ancient Rome, Christians and other faith groups are bucking the trend of fertility collapse. Charts by @lymanstoneky and @ryanburge show this. (10/12)
Professor @epkaufm's 2010 book, "Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?" looks prescient. Thinkers from @robinhanson to @SimoneHCollins share this thesis.
If broader civilization declines due to fertility collapse, leaving a religious remnant, it won't be the first time! (11/12)
Will our trajectory be like that of Ancient Rome, or will we find a way to reverse falling fertility broadly across society? (12/12)
Follow and repost this account @MoreBirths for ideas on raising fertility rates. The pinned thread and highlights tab are recommended!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Great question: If Poland is Catholic, why is 🇵🇱 fertility so low (~1.2)?
Several reasons: (1) "Workism" above all else, (2) Too many 🇵🇱 young adults live at home, (3) Religiosity is lower among the young, and (4) Rigid social norms.
🧵, especially share if your following is 🇵🇱
First, Poland's religion is "workism" even more than Catholicism. Poles work more hours than almost anyone in Europe.
Workism is a term coined by @DKThomp to describe where work becomes the highest value in a society. (2/8)
The problem of capitalism as the highest ideal is not speculation. In every former Soviet state, fertility collapsed with the embrace of free markets, and Poland is no exception. (3/8)
How low can fertility go?
South Korea's newest stats show an impossibly low fertility of 0.7 births per woman, 1/3 of replacement. This is a national collapse, and at this point nothing matters more for the future of 🇰🇷 than reviving birthrates. Please share these solutions.🧵
South Korea's crisis is more acute because of the potential for military conflict with the North. Senior citizen volunteers want to help, but expectations for them are low. (2/6)
The fertility map released yesterday by @nonebusinesshey, shows fertility rates in Seoul at a mere 0.54 births per woman. Urbanization is a major cause of low Korean fertility, but intense gender wars are another cause. (3/6)
Articles like this one in Vox today represent the worst kind of gaslighting: "Everything to raise birthrates has been tried, and nothing works."
This is utterly untrue. Consider, no US president has mentioned the low birthrate crisis even once, and the US leads global culture. 🧵
If the first step toward solving a problem is acknowledging the problem, has the United States even taken that first step?
What US political leader or pop star has even broached the topic? It is hard to think of any! (2/8)
In terms of US policy, both the military and the environment consume a large share of both budgets and the mental energy of leaders.
The low birthrate crisis and pronatalism? These are barely an afterthought, even as most of the developed world faces demographic collapse. (3/8)
Two new analyses suggest a common idea: soaring parenting expectations may be a major cause of low birthrates.
@Aria_Babu finds overly rigid demands on mothers are linked to lower fertility.
@lymanstoneky finds spending on children's clothing is way up, even with fewer kids.
🧵!
In the first of these, @Aria_Babu finds in her piece "Beliefs that kill birth rates" that ironically countries with the socially conservative belief that mothers need to stay at home with their children have lower birthrates overall. 2/8
These findings seem counterintuitive, but they can be extended to China, Japan and Korea, where expectations on parents are among the highest in the world while fertility rates are the world's lowest. 3/8
An astonishing paper this week finds that population explains *virtually all* of the difference in GDP growth in advanced economies over the last 30 years!
"From 1998 to 2019, Japan has grown slightly faster than the U.S. in terms of per working-age adult."
🧵, please share!
Most people are familiar with how the American economy has soared relative to its developed-world peers over the last generation. (2/7)
But if you control for *working age population* a remarkable thing happens: It turns out that most of the developed-world economies have performed similarly since 1990. (3/7)
Those of us who grew up certain of the triumph of capitalism now see its biggest weakness: As incomes rise, fertility rates fall relentlessly. This simple fact threatens the whole enterprise. Do modern economies carry the seeds of their own destruction? A 🧵- pls share/follow.
@philippilk writes, "Capitalism’s imperative of work, consumption is at odds with its structural needs, as it discourages family formation and thus stymies the economy’s ability to grow. This is the core contradiction of capitalism—more profound than anything Marx imagined."(2/9)
Now I want nothing to do with Marxism. Still, the pattern is unmistakable: Birthrates plummet in modern economies *as they become successful*!
For example, fertility in the former Soviet bloc countries plunged while they found new economic freedom and growth—in all cases! (3/9)