Dietmar Pichler Profile picture
Dec 27 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Some of the damage done by Russian, and even already Soviet propaganda seems unfortunately irreversible. No, I am not only talking about Russia itself; I am speaking about the discourse in the West.

Reasons and signs for this assessment🧵
There are a number of people who defended the Soviet Union back then and now stand up for Russia. The enemy remains NATO, the United States, "the West"; Russia can do whatever it wants, they will defend the Kremlin's actions.
Instead of admitting that they were already wrong with the Soviet Union back then, many now even defend modern Russia – this also applies to Western communists, even though Russia is not communist anymore
This shows how far the decades-long anti-western campaign initiated by Moscow has influenced our societies. For instance, the myth that the Soviet Union disappeared 'peacefully' and we were not 'grateful' enough—what about the bloodbath in Vilnius 1991?
As an Austrian, I am truly grateful that the Allies left our country in 1955, and we were able to enjoy freedom despite our responsibility for World War 2.

What about the countries that remained occupied & subjugated by Moscow? We ignored that issue; some even praised it.
Let's move to 2014. Russia told us that 'Russian language is banned in Ukraine,' 'Genocide in Donbas,' 'no Russian military involved,' 'Ukrainians shot down MH17,' & 'US paid Maidan with 5 Billion.' All these lies are still widespread. People refuse to admit that they were wrong
We are talking about politicians, some journalists, 'experts,' 'influencers,' and many more. It takes a lot of guts to admit a mistake, to acknowledge that you are a victim of propaganda. So, people use everything to avoid that painful process of realization.
Instead of countering the various propaganda narratives, many influential people decided to choose self-censorship and avoid the topic entirely. Russian trolls did their part in supporting that development. Debunking—we did not see a lot of it; rather false balance/bothsidesism
The alternate reality created by Russian propaganda is spreading around the world and we are still not aware of the impact.

It is much easier to build resilience against this alternate reality than to help people escape from it

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dietmar Pichler

Dietmar Pichler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DietmarPichler1

Dec 27
If one is uninformed about the goals of Russian propagandists & officials in Ukraine, unaware of or indifferent to the suffering in 🇷🇺occupied territories, and ignorant of several broken agreements, then, and only then, does it make 'sense' to call for 'negotiations' with 🇷🇺🧵
The goals of the Russian invasion remain unchanged, and they consistently communicate this. Some people simply refuse to listen. In addition to Luhansk, Donetsk, and, of course, Crimea, they also claim Zaporizhia and Kherson Oblast—some even add 'also Odesa and Kharkiv, at least.
They also constantly speak about capturing Kyiv, of course. When Kremlin officials talk about 'Denazification,' they are not referring to actual Nazis; instead, they mean subjugating Ukraine, erasing Ukrainian culture, and installing a puppet regime.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 21
7 signs that Russia is winning the information war (unfortunately):

1) We still fail to see how essential the fight against disinfo and propaganda by authoritarian regimes is to protect our democracy & security🧵
2)

The never-ending call for negotiations.

There are still people speaking about "negotiations" as if Russian leaders showed any signs of compromise in their path of cultural genocide, deportations, annexations, and subjugation of Ukraine
3)

2014?

One could think that we did our homework after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but no, Russian narratives about Maidan, Crimea, and Donbas are still widespread, and we failed to educate people. It's easy for Russian propaganda to create confusion about the past...
Read 8 tweets
Dec 12
Im Dezember 2013 bin ich in Kyiv gewesen, die ganze Stadt voller Europaflaggen. Im März 2014 kam ich zurück, die Leute wollten den Maidan nicht räumen, obwohl Yanukovich weg war: "wir wollen sichergehen, dass unser Weg nach Europa führt".
Tausende sind steither dafür gestorben🧵
Als ich nach Wien zurückgekommen war, schockierte mich die Ignoranz von Politik und Gesellschaft. Nicht nur war kaum Solidarität mit der Ukraine vorhanden, man glaubte sogar die russischen Narrative. Nicht einmal in der "pro EU" Szene interessierte man sich wirklich dafür.
Die notwendigen Reformen sind unbestritten, nicht nur im Sinne der EU, sondern auch im Sinne der Ukraine. Aber jetzt, ein Land, welches für den Wunsch sich nach Europa zu orientieren so viel durchmachen musste, weil der autokratische Nachbar das verhindern will zu blockieren...no
Read 6 tweets
Dec 11
7 examples of "clear Stance" vs. "nonsense takes for the Kremlin's benefit" 🧵

"We condemn the Russian invasion and demand the withdrawal of all Russian troops from Ukraine"

vs.

"We condemn the invasion, BUT...."
"All war crimes need to be documented, published, and punished"

vs.

"War is bad; every war is bad, and bad things happen in war..."
"Russia's aggression against Ukraine began in 2014 (Crimea, Donbas, hybrid warfare)."

vs.

"Every war has a history; the West, NATO, and Ukraine are also to blame..."
Read 8 tweets
Dec 5
"Russian borders end nowhere" poster on the border with Estonia, threats against Latvia, Finland, ideas about a new Austria-Hungary under "Russian protection"...

Why do those who consistently believe in Russian claims remain so silent about these threats?🧵
This is actually nothing new: We heard it before the full-scale invasion and afterwards. Russia does not accept the territorial integrity and independence of its neighbors and beyond.
So-called analysts, Duma politicians, and propagandists are free to spread their imperialistic dreams on state propaganda TV. Did we listen to it? Did we react? No, we did not. We decided to ignore it.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 19
The problem with "bothsidesism" or Russian propaganda "between the lines" is that it can sound so "reasonable" or "ethical" that it quite often spreads into less radical communities and can even become mainstream

I wanna highlight some notorious phrases that are very common⬇️🧵
"It takes two to make a war."

Yes, of course, but what do we learn from this statement? Does it imply that the attacker and defender are equally responsible? Or does it suggest that the defender should submit to the attacker, even if it means additional death, torture, rape...
When this phrase is used, none of the consequences for civilians that are accompanied by surrendering are mentioned. It falsely implies that the suffering will end when there are no shots fired on the battlefield. Occupation or the risk of further aggression is overlooked.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(