Here's a small thread on a curious sermon by St. Bonaventure, describing 12 MIRACLES that took place on 25 December 0.
Jesus's birthday.
There will be much caterwauling denial anger ridicule scoffing tears weeping and gnashing of teeth when we reach #7.
#1 'a fulgent star appeared in the sky in parts of the East'
The Star of Bethlehem.
#2 'a golden circle that appeared near the sun'
#3 'the temple of peace in Rome fell to the ground'.
#4 'in Rome a large gush of oil sprung up from the ground and flowed into the Tiber'
#5 'the vinae Engaddi, from which perfume is made, sprouted, flourished, extended its branches and produced its scented liquid'
#6 '30,000 criminals were killed by the Emperor'
#7. Sit down first.
'all the sodomites in the whole world died, both male and female, according to Jerome (3) commenting on the Psalm: The light was born for the just, which shows that He who was born came to reform nature and to promote chastity.'
#8 'brute animals spoke in Judea, among them, two oxen'
#9 'all the idols of Egypt were destroyed when the Virgin gave birth'
#10 'when the Infant was laying in the Manger, the ox and donkey knelt before Him, as if they had reason, and adored Him'
#11 'the whole world was in peace'
#12 'in the East three suns appeared in the sky'
People do not like #7, and even dispute it. But it's genuine. Here's the whole thing in Latin.
And in translation.
Given that the words are, to put it lightly, deeply unpalatable to Prideful ears, there has even been scholarly dispute over whether the original Latin was genuine.
But scholars have concluded the text is authentic.
Part of the confusion may be due to a continuing typo, with some ascribing the quotation to Sermon XXI (21) and not XXII (22).
Anyway, St. Bonaventure does not tell us how Jerome came to believe that all who enjoyed sodomy died on Christmas Day.
Jerome is supposed to comment on Isiah 19, which foretells Christ's birth, and to Psalm 96, which Jerome calls "an enthronement hymn" in 'The New Jerome Biblical Commentary'. But I see no other allusions.
Not enough of a Jerome scholar to dig deeper on that.
Also called the Carter Catastrophe, some researchers believed they discovered, through purely probabilistic reasoning, a formula which shows man has only ~700 years left.
Vdeo at end.
Poundstone calculated we have a 50-50 chance of surviving 760 years.
His argument:
1. Your birth is not special, so you had a 50% chance of being born in the middle of man's reign.
2. There were to date about n = 100 Billion of us.
3. There will be N total men.
4. From that it's easy to calculate a 50% chance that N ≤ 2 * n.
5. Since n = 100 B, N ≤ 200 B in total. Or 100 B yet to be born.
6. If 150 million are born each year, as stats show, then 100 billion / 150 million per year = 50% chance of 666 years left.
It seems a battle most impossible to convince a good chunk of the population that AI is nothing more than a model.
A model written in code, which of course the coders know because they are writing it, code that carries out explicit instructions, and only explicit instructions. Code that runs on machines that operate in fixed and directed ways.
Yet many insist AI’s output is more than its code, and somehow becomes something more than its code, the output the result of some emergent malign or beneficent or at any rate chaotic entity, an entity with greater insight than any mere man.
We continue our quest to disabuse ourselves of the notions that “IQ” is intelligence and that one-number of summaries of intelligence are adequate. All I hope for, likely in vain, is for us to say intelligence instead of IQ when we mean intelligence.
IQ is a score on tests that measures, however crudely or accurately, some but not all aspects of intelligence. Scores on a test are not intelligence: intelligence goes toward producing scores. Single-number scores cannot capture all there is to intelligence.
“IQ”, I repeat, is not intelligence. The Deadly Sin of Reification has struck every person who speaks of somebody “having” a low or high IQ. Unless, which is rare, they mean the score on some test the person has actually taken.
Everybody knows that bad black behavior of all kind is being ignored, excused or outright celebrated.
One example will suffice. (All links at thread end.)
After the lifelong thug and criminal lowlife George Floyd met his expected end—poisoning himself with drugs and engaging in all manner of misbehavior—our rulers and “elites” fell to their knees, even in Congress itself, to show their adoration of black criminality.
It’s so bad now that parents of white kids murdered by blacks rush out to forgive or excuse the killers, lest anybody dare to think they would condemn bad black behavior.
In the 1970s the fear was mass starvation. There were soon, they said, to be too many people, which would lead to disastrous pressure on the food supply, and we’d run out.
Some said this was to be because of Global Cooling, which was the environmental theory in vogue then. Others, like the continuously venerated and awarded Paul Ehrlich, said it was because of mankind’s predilection to breed.
Not to bore us with a glut of data, but here is wheat production in the good ol’ United States from 1961 to 2023. Up, up, and away.
Science can be saved by returning to its classical roots Irreducible by Federico Faggin Reviewed
Physicist and microchip inventor Federico Faggin is an open unabashed enthusiastic panpsychist. Any number of such people are found in the sandal-shod organic trail-mix crowd, the sort who willingly live in Ithaca, NY.
Faggin displays no shades of this in his Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, And Human Nature. His take is rooted in physics, by route of a profound spiritual experience. It was in thinking how to reconcile this experience with physics that he came to his theory.