Just Human Profile picture
Dec 29, 2023 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Mini Thread

FOUR Actual and/or Potential questions before SCOTUS re: Trump, Smith, and the 14th Amendment... should they choose to accept them:
1)

By the American Center for Law & Justice and CO Republican Central Cmte

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/2…
Image
2)

Whatever the decision is from the USCA for DC, it's going to be appealed to SCOTUS.

By Trump if he loses. By Smith if he loses.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
3)

By former Attorney General Ed Meese and Law Professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/2…
Image
4)

And now this move by the Secretary of State for Maine is surely going to be appealed and the question(s) will be something like what the American Center for Law & Justice and CO Republican Central Cmte are asking in thier petition, but with the SoS in place of he State. (ie- does the SoS have the authority...)

maine.gov/sos/news/2023/…Image
Imagine the delectable, scrupulous, and devastating prose that Scalia would pen in answer to these questions, and others that have fallen before the Court since his death (murder)...

(sigh)

Those Evil bastards. Hell awaits them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Aug 4
From DNI Gabbard's press release on the referral:

"the facts reveal this new assessment was based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured i.e. the Steele Dossier or deemed as not credible. This was politicized intelligence..."

dni.gov/index.php/news…Image
From the Durham Report discussion of the 371 conspiracy statute: Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 4
🧵Update on DOJ's efforts to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material:

-DOJ has a filing due today answering 5 questions from Judge Berman (Epstein) and 3 questions from Judge Englemeyer (Maxwell).

-Letters from victims are beginning to hit the docket.

-One of Maxwell's attorneys has withdrawn from the case.
In Epstein, Judge Berman asked DOJ to

-Verify dates of the grand jury presentation(s)
-Provide all exhibits shown to grand jurors
-State whether DOJ seeks to unseal the exhibits as well as the transcripts (in an earlier filing they said they did)
-ID which exhibits are not public record
-Provide the court with analysis on how the Nolle Prosequi that ended this case when Epstein died may impact this current effort to unseal these materials.Image
Nolle prosequi means "not to wish to prosecute."

When Epstein died, the case needed to be dismissed, as it couldn't go forward without a defendant. Image
Read 50 tweets
Aug 1
From the Durham Report beginning on page 107

"the FBI had no intelligence about Trump or others associated with the Trump campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign" Image
"Moreover, significant intelligence information that first became available for the FBI to review in 2018 showed that the Russians had access to sensitive U.S. government information years earlier that would have allowed them to identify Steele's subsources." Image
"Indeed, an experienced FBI analyst assessed that as a result of their access to the information, Steele's subsources could have been compromised by the Russians at a point in time prior to the date of the first Steele dossier report." Image
Read 15 tweets
Aug 1
Picture this: Russian hackers are reading emails exchanged between members of think tanks, Hillary Clinton’s campaign staff, and Democratic leadership.
These hackers must translate the emails into Russian, analyze them, and produce reports for the SVR/Moscow.
When drafting their analytical memoranda, they attach only the key emails that support their findings, avoiding the inclusion of dozens of emails or detailed explanations of who sent what to whom or each person’s role.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 31
The Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened based on this single paragraph, which was itself based on a conversation overheard at a bar between Papadopoulos and an Australian diplomat.Image
Image
The conversations happened on May 6 and May 10, 2016.

Over two months later, ON THE EXACT SAME DAY THAT HILLARY CLINTON APPROVED THE PLAN, July 26, Australia gives the notes on this conversation to U.S. State Dept officials in the U.K. and then hand it off to the FBI official at the London Embassy.Image
That was enough to spark an FBI investigation, which led to a FISA warrant on @GeorgePapa19 and then FISAs on other people (Page, @GenFlynn ) associated with the Trump campaign, and the full-fledged Crossfire Hurricane investigation had "oil poured into the fire" from the Steele Dossier, Alfa Bank, Yotophone...
Read 29 tweets
Jul 30
🧵Late last night, DOJ filed responses in both the Epstein and Maxwell cases, addressing each judge’s questions regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials.

DOJ also submitted the following ex parte and under seal:

-An index of the grand jury materials
-A complete set of unredacted grand jury transcripts
-A complete set of redacted grand jury transcripts
-A description of other grand jury materials (exhibits, etc.)Image
DOJ's effort to unseal the Epstein grand jury material in SDFL was recently denied due to the 11th Circuit's binding opinion in Pitch v. United States, which restricted the judge in that case from unsealing them.

DOJ knew this going in and conceded it in their filing. They made the filing, knowing it would be denied, for purposes of appeal later.

I have a thread breaking that down here: x.com/realjusthuman/…Image
In the 2nd Circuit, where SDNY is, that court has held that “there are certain ‘special circumstances’ in which release of grand jury records is appropriate..."

Even if the exemptions listed in the federal rule governing grand jury matters are not met.
law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/r…Image
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(