Thread by @zei_squirrel

they got one of their Pulitzer prize winners to launder the mass rape atrocity propaganda in the New York Times, which shows you just how desperate they are to keep the genocide going by keeping liberals on board, and, if you read the piece carefully, that they have zero evidence

the NYT piece is classic propaganda by a liberal Oxbridge educated scumbag who has written countless such pieces for decades, which is how he got his Pulitzer. Frontload it with graphic descriptions to blunt the mind of the reader, and then admit you literally have nothing

the only tangible "evidence" he mentions that hasn't already been debunked as the deranged lunatic rantings of Zionist freaks is a clip of a woman with her dress not covering her. That's it. That's what he begins his piece with with evocative paragraphs, and there's nothing else

in fact, after giving that graphic description filled with innuendo and the assumption that she must have clearly been raped, he immediately launches into explaining why it's actually totally normal for no forensic evidence of it actually existing. They were clumsy, shocked, etc.

he actually cites the deranged fucking lunatic who came up with the baby in oven and beheaded babies hoax as a credible witness. This NYT Pulitzer prize winner cites him in his piece saying "I should have taken photos" while legitimizing his fantasies. That is fucking insane

this NYT piece is the most Hitlerian Nazi propaganda article I have ever read in my life, and its principal author, Jeffrey Gettleman, along with Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella, are the most depraved genocidal scumbags walking on the planet right now

btw that clip he begins his article with to terrorize and browbeat the good liberal pussyhat wearing reader to accept all the deranged fantasies he unfurls later in the piece with zero evidence, is included in the snuff film the regime is touring around. It's not evidence:

so all he has is a clip that is not evidence of anything, two alleged witness accounts which are from clearly deranged Zionist lunatics, one of whom is anonymous, the other a military official in the regime, whose unhinged claims are not corroborated by anything. That's it

the whole purpose of the piece is not to prove anything. It's for Jeffrey Gettleman to explain why they don't have to prove anything. You just have to believe them, and if you don't, you're a terrible monster. Why? Because a Pulitzer prize winning NYT scumbag cunt said so

now I have a case much stronger than anything in that NYT piece. It's a woman who testified in court and maintains to this day that she was violently raped by 4 young black men. Direct eyewitness. But just one problem: Ron DeSantis exonerated them in 2021 against her objections

Norma Padgett went to the police and court, gave direct eyewitness testimony that she was violently gang-raped by 4 black men, to this very day she says she was. They were convicted. But now Ron DeSantis, the judicial system and every media outlet acknowledges they were innocent

but Jeffrey Gettleman has employed an evidentiary standard for Palestinians that is far below that of the Norma Padgett case. So if that's sufficient evidence, then surely he must believe that the Groveland Four were justly convicted. In other words, Gettleman is an open Nazi

Gettleman believes a society that is systematically racist and genocidal against the people it occupies - Palestinians - requires a paper-thin evidentiary standard to believe whatever atrocity propaganda is disseminated about them. Just say they did it, and that's enough for him

there were Gettlemans who said that all the white women who accused black boys and men of raping them had to be believed. I mean, they're direct eyewitnesses. Why would they lie? Others saw it too! Jews mass raped Aryan women in Nazi Germany. They said it, they had witnesses!

don't ask for a high evidentiary standard because these are groups being targeted by a systematically racist, genocidal regime, from a society that is rife with such racism against them. Don't even ask for an evidentiary standard you would expect in any US court. Just believe it

oh btw, we obviously don't lower the evidentiary standard to that level when it comes to our own. So obviously Gettleman doesn't believe Joe Biden is a rapist, despite the evidentiary he upheld in that NYT piece being far exceeded: direct testimonies from his many victims

no, you see, when all these women come out to say that Biden sexually assaulted and raped them, we can't just believe it. Oh some deranged lunatic IDF Zionist said he saw gangs of Palestinians raping a pristine Jewish girl? Obviously true. If you don't believe it you're a monster

Jeffrey Gettleman, that genocidal Nazi scumbag who has written a piece that will prolong the ongoing massacre of Palestinians, will now be an object of focus of mine. I had never heard of this cunt before, but I will now devote my time to exposing just what he scumbag liar he is

another problem for genocidal Nazi Gettleman: By his own evidentiary standard that he employed to launder Israeli atrocity propaganda, there is actual clear evidence of mass systemic rape of Palestinians, including children. Where is the NYT piece on that?

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1731796063265177646

you see when there is actual corroborated evidence of Israeli genocidal crimes, including the mass beheading of babies that we can all see footage of, the mass executions of women and children and babies, the NYT is suddenly incapable of seeing it

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1740532993293492524

btw Gettleman is such a fucking idiot he just reprints one of the deranged "witnesses" repeating the line about "they cut off breasts and played around with them", without realizing this is the most common trope in atrocity propaganda, against native Americans, Africans, etc.

to be clear zero corroborating evidence of this is presented, though it should be easy to find. Instead Gettleman makes excuses for why there is no evidence, and you just have to take this deranged lunatic's word for it. The NYT is just publishing classic atrocity propaganda now:

the reason I said this piece is the most Hitlerian one I've ever read is because as Norman explains, Gettleman employs Hitler's strategy of laundering his claims by lying so outrageously, so massively, that people go: Surely there must be some truth to it

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1712502235995820278

and to be clear, the NYT is not new to laundering genocidal atrocity propaganda about those who dare resist the US-NATO-Israeli empire. Just look at their constant pieces smearing the Viet Cong, the Hamas of that era, as mass rapist baby beheaders:

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1716223745365328127

and just as Gettleman openly and without any shame says in the piece that he got much of his propaganda straight from the Israeli regime and is just regurgitating it, the NYT has always been a central hub for the CIA and Mossad to launder their propaganda:

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1719700058583482770

a classic case of atrocity propaganda focused on the claimed sexual depravity of "savages" which the NYT is now reproducing word for word, the "Black Shame". Claims of mass rape full of "witnesses" gathered by good pacifist E. D. Morel. It was all fake. Gettleman is today's Morel

October 7 was the most filmed military operation in history, not just from the Hamas side, but also Israeli with CCTV and cell phones. But there is not a single case, not one, of these supposed "mass rapes" happening all over the place being captured on video or photo

Gettleman and the NYT's job is to make you stop asking the obvious question: Why? And come to the obvious conclusion: Because it's all deranged atrocity propaganda, the latest phase after the 40 beheaded babies in ovens hoax collapsed, to keep the genocide of Gaza going

remember the deranged Israeli regime military trainer, one of the two key "witnesses" cited in the NYT propaganda piece by Gettleman? He changed his story multiple times, contradicted himself, and provably lied. This is their main non-anonymous "witness":

https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1740641517847335009

here is the other anonymous "witness" also provably lying, which again Gettleman and the NYT reprinted without even bothering with the most minimal journalistic scrutiny, not even bothering to check if the claims are coherent and match available evidence:

https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1740647278455525377