For nearly 25 years we have been kicking can down the road, trying to contain Putin's imperialism with dialogue and diplomacy while he continues to ignore borders and flatten cities. 🧵👇
In 2014, Russia's first attack against Ukraine was paused by the Minsk agreements, but the underlying issues were left for another day. Russia became tomorrow's problem. 🧵
Tomorrow always comes. The problem of Russia's imperialism didn't disappear in 2014, and to most eastern flankers it was clear that the next phase of the invasion would be costlier and deadlier. And so it was. 🧵
When Russia attacked again, the war suddenly became today’s problem. Again we think we can solve it by making it tomorrow’s problem. 🧵
But the premise has not changed. Russia’s imperialist revanchist ambitions will remain. The next phase would be directed not just against Ukraine, Georgia or Moldova but possibly against NATO. The price, human and economic, will only go up. 🧵
We could wait for what I have called the “Pearl Harbor effect”, a moment in history when the problems of tomorrow finally become the problems of today, but at an enormously inflated price. Or we could treat this as today’s problem and start solving it today. 🧵
We are on the verge of repeating historic mistakes. I am convinced that if we won’t defeat Russia now, that means our chosen path is to suffer unimaginable and unnecessary losses before we eventually decide it’s time to step up and win. /🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia is imperialist and has always been imperialist. This is what today’s Russians have inherited from their past. In Lithuania, we know all about the history of Russian “culture and humanity” from bitter experience. Some examples… 🧵1/10
Not long ago the Kremlin was sending tanks to crush Lithuanian independence. This was standard treatment for any country trying to break free from Soviet occupation. This is Russian imperialism. 🧵2/10
Putin declared that the fall of the Soviet Union was the biggest geopolitical mistake of the 20th century. He is trying to “fix” this by occupying parts of Georgia and Ukraine. This is Russian imperialism. 🧵3/10
Every two years Russia holds a military exercise called ZAPAD, and usually it involves planning an invasion of NATO with threats of nuclear attacks. 🧵1/8
#QuoVadisEuropa
In 2009 Russia and Belarus excercised for an attack on a NATO country which looked like a Baltic country, threatening a nuclear attack on Warsaw if Poland would try to stop the advance. 2/8
So if you would ask me the question “are you afraid of this?” I would say I couldn’t live if I was afraid, the people in my country wouldn’t be able to live if they were afraid. 3/8
For years the West said economic cooperation would persuade dictators to support rules based international order. But all we did was feed their economies while letting them break all the rules. China is betting that we will repeat this mistake. It's time to try something else👇🧵
We bought energy, we transferred technology, we invested in totalitarian regimes. We enabled them to grow. Not for the practical benefits, but due to the messianic delusion that the spread of western influence is inevitable and can only bring change for good.
Our entanglement made us strategically blind. We ignored the threats made not only to countries bordering Russia but also to western society itself. Armies were neglected, borders left undefended, our capacity to rise up and repel invaders diminished.
China is not trying to help Russia, or anybody else. China only helps China. Xi is trying to create an alternative to Pax Americana, realigning as many countries as possible under a new order: Pax Sinica. This what this means: 🧵
China’s model is based on domination, not negotiation. Subscribers to Pax Sinica receive China’s aid without burdensome human rights requirements, but eventually fall into traps that ensure the house always wins. Pax Cynica, no less.
Beijing has decided that now is the time to project its power globally. The so-called peace proposal for Ukraine, mediation between Saudi Arabia and Iran is just the beginning. We cannot now expect to change China’s course by persuasion.
We all want peace in Ukraine, but a lasting peace cannot be based on myths. Here are the myths that must be discarded before we can talk about achieving sustainable peace: 🧵
Myth 1: Ukraine is unable to win back all territory including Crimea.
Reality: Ukrainians have shown repeatedly that they can restore territorial integrity, given the necessary weapons and training. Our support can be decisive. The ball is in our court. Ukraine can win.
Myth 2: Russia is unbeatable.
Reality: Ukraine’s allies have only committed a tiny fraction of their resources. Manufacture can be ramped up. The combined Nordic-Baltic GDP alone is bigger than Russia’s. Russia could and should be defeated.
The thing that holds us back is fear. We are afraid of what will happen if Russia actually loses this war. 🧵
There is no win-win scenario in Ukraine. For the foundations of international law to survive, Ukrainians must regain and retain 100% of their territory and sovereignty.
If we fully and finally accept that Russia has to lose in order for us to avoid future wars, then I believe all the other questions about support for Ukraine will be much easier to answer.