And here is the new joint intervention declaration by the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Denmark and Canada in the #Genocide case before the International Court of Justice.
Just to be clear…. 1/5 icj-cij.org/sites/default/…
This was submitted last month in the ICJ Genocide case against *Myanmar*. The factual context is different from Gaza but the Declarants advance interesting arguments re genocidal intent, treatment of children & forced displacement. 2/5
Methods of physical destruction ‘include “subjecting a group of people to a subsistence diet, systematic expulsion from homes and the induction of essential medical services below minimum requirement”’ with ‘lower threshold’ for determining harm 'when the victim is a child’. 3/5
“The Declarants further submit that a violent military operation triggering the forced displacement of members of a targeted group may similarly contribute to evidence of a specific intent to destroy the protected group” 4/5
Whatever your views on the chances of success, you can’t help wondering whether UK, Germany, Canada et al will reiterate these points of law if they decide to intervene in South Africa v Israel…?
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The IDF statement on the Jabalia refugee camp airstrikes confirms attribution and excludes most forms of mistakes. The resulting IHL analysis has important implications for US/US policy on supporting Israeli operations. Short 🧵 idf.il/144297/
Israel could not have known the exact no. of civilians that would be killed, but given location, intel & choice of munitions, a high level of CIVCAS must have been expected. The eventual toll of 100s of casualties would have been a reasonable expectation.
This was no accident. The civilian killing at Jabalia was deliberate, albeit incidental to an attack on a military target. But was it lawful?
@JaninaDill @shashj