Basically, a bearish FVG is CLOSED above and becomes support
A bullish FVG is CLOSED below and becomes resistance
This also counts as a market structure shift as well
Correct term: iFVG/inversion
The first thing you should understand is:
When should an iFVG actually occur? Well that’s basically asking when a bullish FVG should fail, or bearish FVG fail?
A bullish FVG should FAIL if we hit buyside and retrace, and a bearish FVG should fail if we hit sellside and retrace
So in this example, I would expect a iFVG to occur since we just ran high of day, meaning there is no need to bounce off this FVG if there’s no more liquidity above to take:
Then I wait for it to fail (get closed below) then I short
So how do I use them properly for entries?
First things first, I make sure it’s a really obvious one.
It can’t be a million FVGs together, such as 3 in a row. Here are some bad examples of fair value gaps I would not be interested in using as inversions:
So you can clearly see in those examples, way too many iFVGs to use there
These examples show clear iFVGs that stick right out
In all these examples we have purged some sort of liquidity or low, making them a good one
They are also all singular FVGs
How do you enter and where does the stop go? This can be changed a bit from what I do…
I personally enter on the candle close after it closes through the FVG
I typically do not wait for retrace because I miss a lot of moves
The only time I do not market buy/short on an iFVG
is when the iFVG has really bad RR. Let’s say we close way below the FVG and the RR is now horrible, well then I will wait for retrace
So in this example, we close above the iFVG, however the RR was almost negative to the high, so I wait for the retracement for better RR
In the above example, the RR was so bad if I were to market buy, so I would wait for retracement instead
In THIS example, no matter if you enter on the the close or not, RR is similar, so if you do not want to miss the move, get in on the close
It really all comes down to this: would you rather take a 2R trade and know you are getting filled, or try to wait for a 3R and no guarntee you get filled
Knowing both have a high win rate, the 2R is good enough for me, so I do not care about retracement
If it is a 2R versus a 1R, then obviously I’ll wait for the 2R if the 2R has the retracement, but it does not matter, all depends on your risk.
STOP LOSS:
You can either have the stop loss above or below the old high
or
What I do is this:
My stop loss is if we close back the other way above/below the FVG
So if we activate an inversion and close above it, I’ll buy, and get out if we close back below
If you do the first option risk is easier to calculate, but for second option, you have to guesstimate the risk, so maybe size down a little if you do second option, but I think second option is better and that’s my personal preference
You do not want to see an iFVG disrespected
The other reason I prefer second option is because most times we close back below/above an iFVG, we end up hitting the low/high anyways, and I feel like long term it’s worth putting risk before that knowing it will probably hit anyways if we disrespect iFVG
This is exactly what I am talking about
-We go hit the old high anyways after the iFVG fails, so why let yourself put on more risk than you need to if you know we will run the high most of the time anyways if the iFVG fails
So, that’s how I enter and exit
Ideally, my favorite targets for liquidity and what I look for is:
-Equal highs above (good liquidity pool
-Singular inversion entry
-Swept the low (liquidity
If we swept the lows, why would we expect the bearish FVGs to reject? We wouldn’t, so I use them as inversions.
I have a more advanced lesson on my YouTube in this playlist here on iFVGs I long due to us not hitting internal liquidity, but this is a basic thread, so if you want to see my internal liquidity rule, watch this playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=…
That’s it for now!
Remember, don’t take the ones that are bad RR, just tape read them as they will likely still work
This was a very basic thread, and next week I am putting out a bigger course on them combining them with MMXM
And it will go in depth much more and be more
complete than this thread… but of course you could just watch my YouTube for free / use this thread for free
This paid course is for people who want to put more work in, but anyways stay tuned
I also have a discord here if you have any questions:
I also have a private room where I live stream everyday and teach live time which I will not promote a link as I am sure you are smart enough to find it😂
A thread of 5 inversion plays I liked last week and why I liked them
Going to try to do these for every week if I have time🧵:
Play 1:
Monday
I liked this because…
-There was an SMT at the top with ES (meaning one index hit the higher and the did not)
-We were also inside of a giant volume imbalance on the daily
-Second target was optional depending if you hold for the full MMXM
Play 2:
Tuesday
-Even though there was a tiny FVG above this one, the one I had marked looked obvious to go up if it was violated BECAUSE of the LRLR we didn’t fully break
Another thing I REALLY do prefer is getting a new swing low or swing high for the framework to work.
Sometimes we form a FVG or orderblock up to data highs RIGHT after they come out and half the time that PD array fails if we don’t get any new swing points created with them
In this picture you can see the last swing low was the data candle but none in between so I would not be interested in longing the orderblock. Only an inversion off the OB with a new swing low created.
That OB (or FVG in some cases) long is hit or miss without new swing low
Also, in the last example, we really don’t see any bearish FVGs trading AWAY from the swing high. When we see that, that is best.
This example is perfect. We have a SINGULAR FVG trading away from the data lows we didn’t purge. So I know that’s my short as soon as it breaks.
This would definitely be my “one setup for life” as it barely ever fails for me personally, but patience is required
Let’s begin👇
Before I get started, I just want to say that I’ve never seen a thread or video about this, and I only know a few others besides me who love using this setup
This can probably be combined with a few different models, but I use it with inversions.
THIS is the model.
It’s a bit complicated but I’m going to show you each aspect of it in detail. You should use this for when you are done with the thread.
Let’s start with a basic example of the best possible inverse you can take no matter if you know the bias or not:
This is the inverse where we have NOT hit internal liquidity and we KNOW the market has to go to the next internal liquidity (high in this case) even if bias iswrong
This thread will go over my inverse strategy I use to have a very high win rate
I recently passed an evaluation account and got a 100% win rate on it (that is now sitting at +1k on funded)
Read below👇
I am going to make this a VERY short thread so you can easily find the model and use it when you see it
I use this strategy on ES, and NQ futures as well as forex pairs such as EURUSD, and GBPUSD and gold
The first thing I look for is a low or high being swept, so in this example a low, and if a SINGULAR bearish fair value gap sweeps a low, I then look to see if that fair value gap gets closed above