One of my tailors, Fred Nieddu, made all of the menswear for The Crown, including everything from the suits to sportswear. The clothes were surprisingly accurate in some ways but also deviated in others. Let's talk about those subtle details. 🧵
Like many young men, King Charles was influenced by the fashion of his day and only found his style later in life. In the 1960s, he wore single-breasted suits and sport coats with razor-thin lapels. Narrow lapels during this time were considered very "modern" (think: Mad Men).
Again, influenced by the fashion of his day, Charles switched to a wider lapel in the 1970s but still stuck with a single-breasted closure. Note how, in the '60s, his lapel ended about 1/3rd way from collar to shoulder seam. Below, it's closer to 1/2 (a more classic width)
In the 1980s, he started hitting his stride, switching from single- to double-breasted, a style he has stuck with to this day. His double-breasted coats are always paired with a tiny four-in-hand knot and semi-spread collar (generally considered very tasteful).
In 2012, GQ named Charles "Best Dressed." Just a few years earlier, another pub named him "Worst Dressed." "Presumably, it sells publications," he said at London Collections, a tradeshow. "Meanwhile, I have gone on, like a stopped clock. My time comes around every 25 years."
The thing to understand about Charles' style is that he gets most of his non-military clothes made for him by Anderson & Sheppard and the independent cutters associated with that style, such as Tom Mahon (now at Redmayne) and Steven Hitchcock (who made the coat below).
These tailors specialize in something known as the drape cut.
In the early 20th century, Dutch-English tailor Frederick Scholte noticed that when you cinch up the belt on a guard's coat, it puffs up the chest and makes the wearer look very masculine.
Scholte liked this effect and incorporated it into his tailoring. His coats featured a slightly extended shoulder and a fuller, rounder chest. The chest piece—a wirey horsehair cloth—was cut on the bias and inserted into the chest to give it some roundness.
Without delving into technical details that will bore most people, these coats were cut very "straight" (as opposed to "crooked"). Combined with a fuller chest and a dart that didn't quite make it to the armhole, this created excess material that "draped" along the armhole.
This effect is why this style is known as the drape cut. Scholte would go on to train Peter Gustaf Anderson, co-founder of Anderson & Sheppard, one of the most famous Savile Row firms. A&S would go on to dress stars like Noël Coward, Gary Cooper, and Fred Astaire.
The drape cut is one of Savile Row's most distinguishing cuts. It is defined by its soft, sloping shoulder and fuller, rounder chest. Historically, it was also made with a slightly curved lapel. The draping along the armhole is easier to spot on thin worsteds than heavy tweeds
You can really see the difference when you place a clean chest (pic 1) next to a drape cut (pic 2). Notice how the first suit has a chest that sits close to the body. The second is rounder and fuller. The advantage of the second is that it can confer a V-shaped silhouette.
The curve on a lapel is known as a belly. In tailoring, a lapel can be made:
1. With a little belly 2. A lot of belly 3. Straight (no belly) 4. So straight that it looks almost convex (popular in Florence, Italy). Notice how the curve forms a half-moon with bottom of the coat
Ok, so we've established the drape cut. Along with his penchant for double-breasted jackets, this is what defines Charles' style. Except for his military clothes, Charels mostly wears a soft shoulder, fuller and rounder chest, and slightly curved lapel.
Fred, the cutter who made all the menswear in The Crown, doesn't specialize in the drape cut. However, he's more flexible than most tailors, which is why he's often hired to work on film and TV projects.
The Crown stays true to many of the larger points of Charles' style. They put the younger Charles in single-breasted jackets and the older Charles in double-breasted jackets. The shoulder line is reasonably soft and sloping. The fabrics also reflect Charles' taste.
Fred also does a resonably good job of imitating Charles A&S drape cut. But here's where we get to an important point in tailoring:
A tailor is not a photocopy machine. They will never be able to copy something exactly. Every tailor has their own way of making things.
This is not just true of Fred, but even of modern A&S. When you look back at those old A&S coats, many were made by cutters and tailors who have either since retired or passed away. It's more important to think about the hands that lay on a garment, not the label.
When choosing a custom tailor, it's best to look at their house style and stay close to it. This will result in less risk and disappointment. Every tailor has their own way of making things, and it's like their thumbprint on a garment.
Fred did his version of the drape cut, but his version doesn't have the same roundness as the originals. Notice the roundness on Charles' chest. West's version is nice—soft shoulder, DB closure—but is not as round. This has to do with the pattern & making.
The lapels were also often not as bellied. Even when cutting for private clients, Fred typically does a very straight lapel. The combination of the jacket's lapel and collar results in a much more angular look. The difference is evident when you compare these pics.
I spoke to Fred last year about this project, and he said that he and the costume department both agreed that they wanted to capture the general ideas of Charles' style, but weren't looking to make exact replicas. Which I think is reasonable.
He also noted that you can't replicate the same exact look on different bodies. Charles is 5'10"; Josh O'Connor is 6'1". Edward VIII was 5'7"; Alex Jennings is 6'1". That's a 5" difference! Replicating the same drape cut will look more off on him than doing something slimmer.
Ultimately, I think they did a great job. I'm told that even the ski suits were bespoke. The point of this thread is to help point out some of the subtle details in tailoring, which hopefully go beyond The Crown and allow you to notice things like details and silhouettes IRL
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't totally disagree, but I think guys are more likely to get this wrong than get it right, largely because getting a black dress shirt right requires a lot of attention to fit, silhouette, and material. 🧵
the prob with a black dress shirt is that it can easily make you look like a kid going to prom or the host at a restaurant.
this fit is bad because the shirt is made from a smooth, dressy poplin, the tie is ugly, and the tie and pocket square are made from the same material.
12 years ago, Michael Anton—author of the "Flight 93 Election" essay and a senior national security official in the Trump administration—wrote on StyleForum that black shirts have "always been considered both in bad taste and the mark of the lower, and even criminal, classes."
First, there are some immutable things about tailoring regarding fit. These are technical things—not having to do with style or silhouette, but just whether the clothes actually fit you.
The jacket's collar should always stay seated on your neck, even when you move. In the first photo, the distance between the jacket's collar and Kimmel's neck is known as a collar gap. This is bad. Aim for the second photo. It should stay like this even as you shift around.
The first and most obvious is that the edge of the lapel has been finished with machine-made pick stitch. The term pick stitch refers to the little dimples you see about 1/8" from the edge of the lapel.
Why is there stitching in this area? Let's start with the basics of how clothes are made.
Since the edge of cut fabric frays, a tailor has to sew the seam a little away from the edge. Once sewn, the fabric is folded over. Doing so conceals the seam between the two layers.
my hot take on "quiet luxury" is that it relies on the idea of what comes with inherited wealth: spacious, uncluttered homes, minimal responsibilities, and enough free time to pursue your hobbies. aesthetically, the clothes are often indistinguishable from lower-end lines
I should note my comment is only about menswear. In womenswear, these lines offer interesting silhouettes. But in menswear, I struggle to understand the appeal of a machine-made, ready-to-wear overcoat for $5k and cashmere crewneck for $2k when better things can be had for less
Examples
1. Laydon suit jacket ($3.3k). I assume this is machine-made. If someone owns it, flip the lapel over and see if there are dimples. If there are not, then it was machine-padded. You can get a fully handmade, bespoke sport coat for $2.5k. The biggest difference will be in the fit. A bespoke sport coat will be made for your body, whereas a ready-made one will be made for an imaginary person who may not be built like you.
2. Johnson cotton-nylon mac ($4.9k). You can get something from a British heritage company such as Grenfell, Cordings, or Mackintosh for about $2k. Or you could get a fully handmade bespoke overcoat made from a more expensive material for $4k.
3. Benji cashmere sweater ($2k). Some designers, such as Lemaire, do men's knits with very interesting silhouettes. But the whole point of quiet luxury is that no one knows you're wearing some expensive thing. So... ok? You can get the best cashmere knits in the world in this same silhouette from William Lockie for about $500. Quality will be top-notch and no one will know it's not "quiet luxury."
4. Melvin shirt ($1.7k). Again, I just don't get it. Why buy a machine-made, ready-to-wear shirt for $1.7k made in a pattern for an imaginary body that may not be like yours? Anna Matuozzo in Naples will make you a fully bespoke shirt with a gratuitous level of handwork (handmade buttonholes, handrolled hem, and hand-executed top stitching) for like $1k. 100 Hands in India does some of the best bespoke, handmade shirts I've seen, and they cost like $500.
A lot of people confuse fast fashion with cheap clothing. It's true that fast fashion is cheap, but not all cheap clothing is fast fashion. The two terms are not synonymous. Fast fashion is a very distinctive thing. 🧵
Let's start at the beginning. Before the mid-19th century, most clothing was made by women in the home or by a tailor. Ready-made clothing was largely limited to cheap workwear, such as what would have been worn by slaves, miners, and sailors.
In 1849, Brooks Brothers invented the first ready-made suit. Soon after, they also produced ready-made uniforms for both sides of the American Civil War. In the early days of ready-made manufacturing, clothing quality was quite poor, esp when compared to tailor-made clothes
Most sweaters you see on the market are very smooth, such as plain cashmere, Merino, and cotton knits. I think these can be fine under a tailored jacket, such as a sport coat, but they feel like a missed opportunity when worn on their own.
Instead, I think most sweaters look better with some texture. This can be a rougher yarn, such as Shetland (pic 1 and 2). Or it can be a ribbed Shaker knit or cabled Aran (pics 3 and 4).
Grab a Shetland knit and compare it to a smooth Merino. The difference is very obvious.