Read very carefully.
The reversal of human phylogeny: Homo left Africa as erectus, came back as sapiens sapiens
And evolution most likely happened in an area around Sindhu/Saraswati rivers!
This morning my brother Joseph T Noony @JoeAgneya felt I had no basis for Out of India Hypothesis.
I promised to provide details. It is a hectic week at work, but still, I am making an effort. Please pardon spell/grammar errors.
There are two hypotheses. Out of Africa Hypothesis (OOAH) and Out of Eurasia Hypothesis (OOEH) for describing where the current human beings came from.
OOAH has been the dominant hypothesis despite significant paleontological concerns. I mentioned earlier today that about 50 odd skulls of Homo Erectus have been recovered from Java in Indonesia. These now have been dated to 100,000 years before present.
To prove who came first, we can use the same phylogenetic tree as I discussed in busting the claims that “Chili” was brought to India by church.
In this specific instance mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) studies are done to understand how the migration happened. As you know DNA undergoes mutation. However, mtDNA is inherited exclusively from the mother, making it a useful tool for tracing maternal lineages and understanding maternal ancestry without the complications of recombination that occur in nuclear DNA.
For decades, the "Out of Africa" hypothesis has been the cornerstone of human evolutionary theory, positing that modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) originated in Africa before dispersing to other parts of the world. However, the new findings from Lund University suggest a more complex evolutionary journey that involves significant interbreeding and genetic interchange between Homo sapiens and their hominin relatives.
This study’s conclusions are provided below verbatim.
“The present study showed that Eurasia was not the receiver but the donor in Hss evolution. The findings that Homo left Africa as erectus and returned as sapiens sapiens constitute a change in the understanding of Hs evolution to one that conforms to the extensive Eurasian record of Hs paleontology and archaeology.”
Furthermore, even though they term that Hss evolution happened in Eurasia, the map they share about migration path all point to Sindhu/Saraswati riverbed.
I am not a JNU fake PhD. I am a scientist/engineer and know how to analyze complex evidence. So, this paper is kind of upsetting to many who built their career on OOAH.
Science says otherwise!
And Science here is Genomics, Paleontology, and Archeology.
The link to paper is provided below in a separate reply to aid in wider dissemination.
Now as I sign off, a disclaimer.
I said Sindhu Saraswati River. It is likely that these rivers flowed in the same location for more than 100,000 years. That is still an open question. But area certainly is from current Akhand Bharat including Arabian Peninsula.
Thank you for your time. I will answer any questions you have tomorrow around same time.
The reversal of human phylogeny: Homo left Africa as erectus, came back as sapiens sapiens
And evolution most likely happened in an area around Sindhu/Saraswati rivers!
This morning my brother Joseph T Noony @JoeAgneya felt I had no basis for Out of India Hypothesis.
I promised to provide details. It is a hectic week at work, but still, I am making an effort. Please pardon spell/grammar errors.
There are two hypotheses. Out of Africa Hypothesis (OOAH) and Out of Eurasia Hypothesis (OOEH) for describing where the current human beings came from.
OOAH has been the dominant hypothesis despite significant paleontological concerns. I mentioned earlier today that about 50 odd skulls of Homo Erectus have been recovered from Java in Indonesia. These now have been dated to 100,000 years before present.
To prove who came first, we can use the same phylogenetic tree as I discussed in busting the claims that “Chili” was brought to India by church.
In this specific instance mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) studies are done to understand how the migration happened. As you know DNA undergoes mutation. However, mtDNA is inherited exclusively from the mother, making it a useful tool for tracing maternal lineages and understanding maternal ancestry without the complications of recombination that occur in nuclear DNA.
For decades, the "Out of Africa" hypothesis has been the cornerstone of human evolutionary theory, positing that modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) originated in Africa before dispersing to other parts of the world. However, the new findings from Lund University suggest a more complex evolutionary journey that involves significant interbreeding and genetic interchange between Homo sapiens and their hominin relatives.
This study’s conclusions are provided below verbatim.
“The present study showed that Eurasia was not the receiver but the donor in Hss evolution. The findings that Homo left Africa as erectus and returned as sapiens sapiens constitute a change in the understanding of Hs evolution to one that conforms to the extensive Eurasian record of Hs paleontology and archaeology.”
Furthermore, even though they term that Hss evolution happened in Eurasia, the map they share about migration path all point to Sindhu/Saraswati riverbed.
I am not a JNU fake PhD. I am a scientist/engineer and know how to analyze complex evidence. So, this paper is kind of upsetting to many who built their career on OOAH.
Science says otherwise!
And Science here is Genomics, Paleontology, and Archeology.
The link to paper is provided below in a separate reply to aid in wider dissemination.
Now as I sign off, a disclaimer.
I said Sindhu Saraswati River. It is likely that these rivers flowed in the same location for more than 100,000 years. That is still an open question. But area certainly is from current Akhand Bharat including Arabian Peninsula.
Thank you for your time. I will answer any questions you have tomorrow around same time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
